Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:01:07.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ways to Commit Autoinfanticide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

JOHN W. CARROLL
JOHN W. CARROLL*
Affiliation:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITYcarroll@ncsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Is it possible for Suzy to travel back in time and kill her infant self? Vihvelin (1996) and Vranas (2009) hold that autoinfanticide is logically/metaphysically possible but physically impossible. Horacek (2005) believes that autoinfanticide has a nonzero chance of occurring and so is physically possible, but believes that autoinfanticide is metaphysically impossible. To sort out these issues, I describe six ways to commit autoinfanticide; for all six, there is a case to be made for their physical and metaphysical possibility.

Keywords

time travelpossibilitychanceparadox
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , Spring 2016 , pp. 180 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arntzenius, Frank, and Maudlin, Tim. (2013) ‘Time Travel and Modern Physics’. In Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/time-travel-phys/.Google Scholar
Bigelow, John, Collins, John, and Pargetter, Robert. (1993) ‘The Big Bad Bug: What Are the Humean's Chances?’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44, 443–62.Google Scholar
Carroll, John W. (2010) ‘Context, Conditionals, Fatalism, Freedom, and Time Travel’. In Keim-Campbell, Joseph, O'Rourke, Michael, and Silverstein, Harry S. (eds.), Topics in Contemporary Philosophy, Volume 6: Time and Identity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 79–93.Google Scholar
Carroll, John W. (2011) ‘Self Visitation, Traveler Time and Compatible Properties’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 41, 359–70.Google Scholar
Deutsch, David. (1991) ‘Quantum Mechanics Near Closed Timelike Lines’. Physical Review D, 44, 3197–217.Google Scholar
Deutsch, David. (1997) Fabric of Reality. New York: Allen Lane/The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, David, and Lockwood, Michael. (1994) ‘The Quantum Physics of Time Travel’. Scientific American, 270, 68–74.Google Scholar
Eagle, Antony. (2010) ‘Deterministic Chance’. Noûs, 45, 269–99.Google Scholar
Eagle, Antony. (2014) ‘Chance versus Randomness’. In Zalta, Edward (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/chance-randomness/.Google Scholar
Ehring, Douglas. (1987) ‘Personal Identity and Time Travel’. Philosophical Studies, 52, 427–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddu, G. C. (2003) ‘Time Travel and Changing the Past: (or How to Kill Yourself and Live to Tell the Tale)’. Ratio, 16, 16–32.Google Scholar
Gorovitz, Samuel. (1964) ‘Leaving the Past Alone’. Philosophical Review, 73, 360–71.Google Scholar
Handfield, Toby, and Wilson, Alastair. (2014) ‘Chance and Context’. In Wilson, Alastair (ed.), Chance and Temporal Asymmetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 19–44.Google Scholar
Horacek, David. (2005) ‘Time Travel in Indeterministic Worlds’. Monist, 88, 423–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwich, Paul. (1987) Asymmetries in Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiourti, Ira. (2008) ‘Killing Baby Suzy’. Philosophical Studies, 139, 343–52.Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, Robin. (2005) ‘The Cheshire Cat Problem and Other Spatial Obstacles to Backwards Time Travel’. Monist, 88, 336–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. (1976a) ‘The Paradoxes of Time Travel’. American Philosophical Quarterly, 13, 145–52.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1976b) ‘Survival and Identity’. In Rorty, Amelie (ed.), The Identities of Persons (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press), 17–40.Google Scholar
Malament, David B. (1984) ‘“Time Travel” in the Gödel Universe’. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 91–100.Google Scholar
Meiland, Jack W. (1974) ‘A Two-dimensional Passage Model of Time for Time Travel’. Philosophical Studies, 26, 153–73.Google Scholar
Miller, Kristie. (2006) ‘Travelling in Time: How to Wholly Exist in Two Places at the Same Time’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 36, 309–44.Google Scholar
Moyer, Mark. (2008) ‘A Survival Guide to Fission’. Philosophical Studies, 141, 299–322.Google Scholar
Reiner, Rob (director). (1987) The Princess Bride. Los Angeles: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. (2007) ‘Deterministic Chance?’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 58, 113–40.Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore. (2001) Four Dimensionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore. (2002) ‘Time travel, Coincidences and Counterfactuals’. Philosophical Studies, 110, 115–38.Google Scholar
Smeenk, Chris, and Wüthrich, Christian. (2011) ‘Time Travel and Time Machines’. In Callender, Craig (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 577–630.Google Scholar
Thorne, Kip. (2009) ‘Is Time Travel Allowed?’ Plus Magazine. Available at: http://plus.maths.org/content/time-travel-allowed.Google Scholar
Unger, Peter. (1990) Identity, Consciousness, and Value. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter. (2010) ‘Changing the Past’. In Zimmerman, Dean (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 5 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 3–28.Google Scholar
Vihvelin, Kadri. (1996) ‘What Time Travelers Cannot Do’. Philosophical Studies, 81, 315–30.Google Scholar
Vranas, Peter B. M. (2009) ‘Can I Kill My Younger Self? Time Travel and the Retrosuicide Paradox’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 90, 520–34.Google Scholar
Wright, John. (2006) ‘Personal Identity, Fission and Time Travel’. Philosophia, 34, 129–42.Google Scholar