Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:55:34.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BMO and singular integrals over local fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

James E. Daly
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80933, USA
Douglas S. Kurtz
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper is concerned with the behavior of certain principal-value, singular integral operators on L and BMO defined over a local field. It is shown that unless the definition of these operators is changed appropriately, they may not be defined for some function in these spaces. Direct, constructive proofs of the existence and boundedness of the altered operators under certain smoothness conditions on the kernel are given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1993

References

[1]Coifman, R. and Weiss, G., ‘Extensions of Hardy spaces and their use in analysis’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1977), 569645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Daly, J. and Phillips, K., ‘On singular integrals, multipliers, H 1, and Fourier series-a local field phenomenon’, Math. Ann. 265 (1983), 181219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Garcia-Cuerva, J. and Rubio de Francia, J. L., Weighted norm inequalities and related topics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985).Google Scholar
[4]Kurtz, D. S., ‘Littlewood-Paley operators on BMO’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 99 (1987), 657666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Kurtz, D. S., ‘Singular integrals on BMO’, Proc. Centre Math. Anal. Austral. Nat. Univ. 16 (1987), 169172.Google Scholar
[6]Taibleson, M., Fourier Analysis on Local Fields, Math. Notes (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1975).Google Scholar
[7]Wang, S., ‘Some properties of the Littlewood-Paley g-function’, Contemp. Math. 42 (1985), 191202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar