Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:53:04.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A characterization of uniserial rings via continuous and discrete modules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

S. K. Jain ,
S. R. Lopez-Permouth  and
S. Tariq Rizvi
S. K. Jain
Affiliation:
Ohio University Athens, Ohio 45701, U.S.A.
S. R. Lopez-Permouth
Affiliation:
Ohio University Athens, Ohio 45701, U.S.A.
S. Tariq Rizvi
Affiliation:
Ohio University Lima, Ohio 45804, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is well-known that quasi-Frobenius rings are characterized by the property that all propective right modules are injective, as well as by the property that all injective right modules are projective. Similarly, either the property that every quasi-injective or that every quasi-injective is quasi-projective characterizes uniserial rings. Oshiro has given similar characterizations for generalized uniserial rings. The purpose of this paper is to characterize rings for which continuous right modules are discrete. We show that these rings are precisely the uniserial rings. The property that every discrete module is continuous is also investigated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 197 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1991

References

[1]Byrd, K. A., ‘Some characterizations of uniserial rings’, Math.Ann. 186 (1970), 163–170.Google Scholar
[2]Faith, C. and Walker, E. A., ‘Direct sum representatives of injective modules’, J. Algebra 5 (1967), 203–221.Google Scholar
[3]Faith, C., ‘Rings with ascending chain condition on annihilators’, Nagoya Math. J. 27 (1966), 179–191.Google Scholar
[4]Faith, C., Algebra II. Ring Theory, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
[5]Fuller, K. R., ‘On direct representations of quasi-injectives and quasi-projectives’, Arch. Math. 20 (1969), 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Fuller, K. R.,‘On indecomposable injectives over artinian rings’, Pacific J. Math. 29 (1969), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Fuller, K. R. and Hill, D. A., ‘On quasi-projective modules via relative projectivity’, Arch. Math. 21 (1970), 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Goel, V. K. and Jain, S. K., ‘π-injective modules and rings whose cyclic modules are π-injective’, Comm. Algebra 6 (1978), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Harada, M., ‘Non-small modules and non-cosmall modules,’ Ring Theory, pp. 669–689, (proceedings of 1978 Antwerp conference, Marcel Dekker, 1979).Google Scholar
[10]HKoheler, A., ‘Quasi-projective and quasi-injective modules,’ Pacific J. Math. 36 (1971), 713–720.Google Scholar
[11]Levy, L. S., ‘Commutative rings whose homomorphic images are self-injective,’ Pacific J. Math. 18 (1966), 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Mohamed, S. and Mueller, B. J. and Singh, S., ‘Quasi-dual continuous modules,’ J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 39 (1985), 287–299.Google Scholar
[14]Mohamed, S. and Singh, S., ‘Generalizatios of decomposition theorems known over perfect rings,’ J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 24 (1977), 496–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Mohamed, S., and Mueller, B. J., Continuous and discrete modules, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Series No. 147, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Oshiro, K., ‘Lifting modules, extending modules and their applications to generalized uniserial rings,’ Hokkaido Math. J. 13 (1984), 339–346.Google Scholar