Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:26:45.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EMBEDDINGS OF COMPLEX LINE SYSTEMS AND FINITE REFLECTION GROUPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

MURALEEDARAN KRISHNASAMY
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Australia
D. E. TAYLOR*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Australia (email: D.Taylor@maths.usyd.edu.au)
*
For correspondence; e-mail: D.Taylor@maths.usyd.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A star is a planar set of three lines through a common point in which the angle between each pair is 60.A set of lines through a point in which the angle between each pair of lines is 60 or 90 is star-closed if for every pair of its lines at 60 the set contains the third line of the star. In 1976 Cameron, Goethals, Seidel and Shult showed that the indecomposable star-closed sets in Euclidean space are the root systems of types An, Dn, E6, E7 and E8. This result was a key part of their determination of all graphs with least eigenvalue −2. Subsequently, Cvetković, Rowlinson and Simić determined all star-closed extensions of these line systems. We generalize this result on extensions of line systems to complex n-space equipped with a hermitian inner product. There is one further infinite family, and two exceptional types arising from Burkhardt and Mitchell’s complex reflection groups in dimensions five and six. The proof is a geometric version of Mitchell’s classification of complex reflection groups in dimensions greater than four.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Australian Mathematical Society

References

[1]Bourbaki, N., Groupes et algèbres de Lie, Chapitres 4, 5 et 6 (Hermann, Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
[2]Cameron, P. J., Goethals, J.-M., Seidel, J. J. and Shult, E. E., ‘Line graphs, root systems, and elliptic geometry’, J. Algebra 43(1) (1976), 305327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cohen, Arjeh M., ‘Finite complex reflection groups’, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 9(3) (1976), 379436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Conway, J. H., Curtis, R. T., Norton, S. P., Parker, R. A. and Wilson, R. A., Atlas of Finite Groups (Oxford University Press, Eynsham, 1985).Google Scholar
[5]Cvetković, Dragoš, Rowlinson, Peter and Simić, Slobodan, Spectral Generalizations of Line Graphs, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 314 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Delsarte, P., Goethals, J. M. and Seidel, J. J., ‘Bounds for systems of lines, and Jacobi polynomials’, Philips Res. Rep. 30 (1975), 91105.Google Scholar
[7]Kantor, William M., ‘Generation of linear groups’, in: The Geometric Vein: The Coxeter Festschrift (eds. Chandler Davis, Branko Grünbaum and F. A. Sherk) (Springer, New York, 1981),pp. 497509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Koornwinder, Tom H., ‘A note on the absolute bound for systems of lines’, Indag. Math (N.S.) 38 (1976), 152153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Mitchell, H. H., ‘Determination of all primitive collineation groups in more than four variables which contain homologies’, Amer. J, Math. 36 (1914), 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Shephard, G. C. and Todd, J. A., ‘Finite unitary reflection groups’, Canad. J. Math. 6 (1954), 274304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar