Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:14:36.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EXPLICIT INTERPOLATION BOUNDS BETWEEN HARDY SPACE AND ${L}^{2} $

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2013

H.-Q. BUI
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand email Huy-Qui.Bui@canterbury.ac.nz
R. S. LAUGESEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Every bounded linear operator that maps ${H}^{1} $ to ${L}^{1} $ and ${L}^{2} $ to ${L}^{2} $ is bounded from ${L}^{p} $ to ${L}^{p} $ for each $p\in (1, 2)$, by a famous interpolation result of Fefferman and Stein. We prove ${L}^{p} $-norm bounds that grow like $O(1/ (p- 1))$ as $p\downarrow 1$. This growth rate is optimal, and improves significantly on the previously known exponential bound $O({2}^{1/ (p- 1)} )$. For $p\in (2, \infty )$, we prove explicit ${L}^{p} $ estimates on each bounded linear operator mapping ${L}^{\infty } $ to bounded mean oscillation ($\mathit{BMO}$) and ${L}^{2} $ to ${L}^{2} $. This $\mathit{BMO}$ interpolation result implies the ${H}^{1} $ result above, by duality. In addition, we obtain stronger results by working with dyadic ${H}^{1} $ and dyadic $\mathit{BMO}$. The proofs proceed by complex interpolation, after we develop an optimal dyadic ‘good lambda’ inequality for the dyadic $\sharp $-maximal operator.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright ©2013 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 

References

Bui, H.-Q. and Laugesen, R. S., ‘Wavelet frame bijectivity on Lebesgue and Hardy spaces’, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 19 (2013), 376409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coifman, R. R. and Weiss, G., ‘Extensions of Hardy spaces and their use in analysis’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (4) (1977), 569645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fefferman, C. and Stein, E. M., ‘${H}^{p} $ spaces of several variables’, Acta Math. 129 (3–4) (1972), 137193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnett, J. B. and Jones, P. W., ‘BMO from dyadic BMO’, Pacific J. Math. 99 (2) (1982), 351371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafakos, L., Modern Fourier Analysis, 2nd edn, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 250 (Springer, New York, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwaniec, T. and Martin, G., Geometric Function Theory and Nonlinear Analysis, Oxford Mathematical Monographs (The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichorides, S. K., ‘On the best values of the constants in the theorems of M. Riesz, Zygmund and Kolmogorov’. Collection of articles honoring the completion by Antoni Zygmund of 50 years of scientific activity, II. Studia Math. 44 (1972), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, E. M., with the assistance of Timothy S. Murphy. Harmonic Analysis: Real-variable Methods, Orthogonality, and Oscillatory Integrals, Princeton Mathematical Series, 43. Monographs in Harmonic Analysis, III (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar