No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The least α for which E(α) is inadmissible
Part of:
Computability and recursion theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2009
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This paper attempts to classify the least ordinal α0 for which E(α0) (the E closure of α0 ∪ {α0}) is inadmissible. Among the result proved are (i)Lα0 = ZFC-; (ii)α0 is very large in comparison with the least ordinal satifying (i); (iii) (α0, α] marks precisely an ω-Gap, where α¯ = E(α0) ∩ ON; (iv) the Kr-sequence of α0 has length ω.
MSC classification
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1986
References
[1]Barwise, J., Gandy, R. and Moschovakis, Y., “The next admissible set”, J. Symbolic Logic 36 (1971), 108–120.Google Scholar
[2]Fenstad, J. E., “On axiomatizing recursion theory”, pp. 385–404, in Generalized Recursion Theory, Proceedings of the 1972 Oslo Symposium, eds. Fenstad, J. E. and Hinman, P. G., North-Holland, 1974.Google Scholar
[3]Normann, D., “Set recursion”, pp. 303–320, in Generalized Recursion Theory II, Proceedings of the 1977 Oslo Symposium, eds. Fenstad, J. E., Gandy, R. O. and Sacks, G. E., North-Holland, 1978.Google Scholar
[4]Gostanian, R., “The next admissible ordinal”, Ann. Math. Logic 17 (1979), 171–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Marek, W. and Srebrny, M., “Gaps in the constructible universe”, Ann. Math. Logic 6 (1974), 359–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Moldestad, J., Computations in higher types (Lecture Notes in Mathematics 574, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977).Google Scholar
[8]Jensen, R. B., “The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy”, Ann. Math. Logic 4 (1972), 229–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Sacks, G. E., “The K-section of a type n object”, Amer. J. Math. 99 (1977), 901–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Grilliot, T., “Inductive definitions and computability”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 158 (1971), 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access