Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T08:40:19.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NILPOTENT SUBSPACES AND NILPOTENT ORBITS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2018

DMITRI I. PANYUSHEV*
Affiliation:
IITP of the R.A.S., Bolshoi Karetnyi per. 19, 127051 Moscow, Russia email panyushev@iitp.ru
OKSANA S. YAKIMOVA
Affiliation:
Institut für Mathematik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 07737 Jena, Germany email oksana.yakimova@uni-jena.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let $G$ be a semisimple complex algebraic group with Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$. For a nilpotent $G$-orbit ${\mathcal{O}}\subset \mathfrak{g}$, let $d_{{\mathcal{O}}}$ denote the maximal dimension of a subspace $V\subset \mathfrak{g}$ that is contained in the closure of ${\mathcal{O}}$. In this note, we prove that $d_{{\mathcal{O}}}\leq {\textstyle \frac{1}{2}}\dim {\mathcal{O}}$ and this upper bound is attained if and only if ${\mathcal{O}}$ is a Richardson orbit. Furthermore, if $V$ is $B$-stable and $\dim V={\textstyle \frac{1}{2}}\dim {\mathcal{O}}$, then $V$ is the nilradical of a polarisation of ${\mathcal{O}}$. Every nilpotent orbit closure has a distinguished $B$-stable subspace constructed via an $\mathfrak{sl}_{2}$-triple, which is called the Dynkin ideal. We then characterise the nilpotent orbits ${\mathcal{O}}$ such that the Dynkin ideal (1) has the minimal dimension among all $B$-stable subspaces $\mathfrak{c}$ such that $\mathfrak{c}\cap {\mathcal{O}}$ is dense in $\mathfrak{c}$, or (2) is the only $B$-stable subspace $\mathfrak{c}$ such that $\mathfrak{c}\cap {\mathcal{O}}$ is dense in $\mathfrak{c}$.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2018 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 

Footnotes

The research of the first author was carried out at the IITP R.A.S. at the expense of the Russian Foundation for Sciences (project no. 14-50-00150). The second author is partially supported by the DFG priority programme SPP 1388 ‘Darstellungstheorie’ and by the Graduiertenkolleg GRK 1523 ‘Quanten- und Gravitationsfelder’.

References

Cellini, P. and Papi, P., ‘ad-nilpotent ideals of a Borel subalgebra’, J. Algebra 225 (2000), 130141.Google Scholar
Cellini, P. and Papi, P., ‘ad-nilpotent ideals of a Borel subalgebra II’, J. Algebra 258 (2002), 112121.Google Scholar
Collingwood, D. and McGovern, W., Nilpotent Orbits in Semisimple Lie Algebras, Mathematics Series (Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1993).Google Scholar
Elashvili, A. G., ‘The centralizers of nilpotent elements in semisimple Lie algebras’, Tr. Razmadze Mat. Inst. (Tbilisi) 46 (1975), 109132 (in Russian); MR0393148.Google Scholar
Fang, C., ‘Ad-nilpotent ideals of minimal dimension’, J. Algebra 403 (2014), 517543.Google Scholar
Gerstenhaber, M., ‘On nilalgebras and linear varieties of nilpotent matrices, IV’, Ann. of Math. (2) 75 (1962), 382418.Google Scholar
Joseph, A., ‘On the variety of a highest weight module’, J. Algebra 88 (1984), 238278.Google Scholar
Kawanaka, N., ‘Generalized Gelfand–Graev representations of exceptional simple groups over a finite field I’, Invent. Math. 84 (1986), 575616.Google Scholar
Kempken, G., ‘Induced conjugacy classes in classical Lie algebras’, Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hambg. 53 (1983), 5383.Google Scholar
Panyushev, D., ‘Complexity and nilpotent orbits’, Manuscripta Math. 83 (1994), 223237.Google Scholar
Panyushev, D. and Röhrle, G., ‘On spherical ideals of Borel subalgebras’, Arch. Math. 84 (2005), 225232.Google Scholar
Sommers, E., ‘Equivalence classes of ideals in the nilradical of a Borel subalgebra’, Nagoya Math. J. 183 (2006), 161185.Google Scholar
Spaltenstein, N., ‘On the fixed point set of a unipotent element on the variety of Borel subgroups’, Topology 16 (1977), 203204.Google Scholar
Spaltenstein, N., Classes Unipotentes et Sous-groupes de Borel, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 946 (Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 1982).Google Scholar
Steinberg, R., ‘On the desingularization of the unipotent variety’, Invent. Math. 36 (1976), 209224.Google Scholar
Vinberg, E. B., Gorbatsevich, V. V. and Onishchik, A. L., Gruppy i algebry Li 3, Sovremennye Problemy Matematiki. Fundamental’nye Napravleniya, 41 (VINITI, Moskva, 1990), (in Russian); English translation: V. V. Gorbatsevich, A. L. Onishchik and E. B. Vinberg, Lie Groups and Lie Algebras III (Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 41) (Springer, Berlin, 1994).Google Scholar