We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Theorem 1 of the paper [1] is stated in an unnecessarily weak form. What is actually proved is much stronger.
[1]Bombieri, E. and van der Poorten, A. J., ‘Some quantitiative results related to Roth's Theorem’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. (Ser. A) 45 (1988), 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar