Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:55:41.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subspaces associated with boundary points of the numerical range

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

S. Majumdar
Affiliation:
University of New EnglandArmidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia
Brailey Sims
Affiliation:
University of New EnglandArmidale, N.S.W. 2351AustraliaQueen's UniversityKingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Stampfli and Embry characterized points in the numerical range which are extreme in terms of the linearity of corresponding sets of vectors. Das and Craven generalized this to include the case of unattained boundary points. We give an alternative proof of this result using a technique of Berberian. This approach appears to be more conceptual in that it enables us to deduce the result from that of Stampfli and Embry. We also illustrate how the same technique may be used to generalize other results of Embry.

MSC classification

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1985

References

Berberian, S. K. (1962), ‘Approximate proper vectors’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 13, 111114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berberian, S. K. and Orland, G. H. (1967), ‘On the closure of the numerical range of an operator’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 18, 499503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, K. C. and Craven, B. D. (1983), ‘Linearity and weak convergence on the boundary of numerical range’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. (Series A), 35, 221226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embry, M. R. (1970), ‘The numerical range of an operator’, Pacific J. Math., 32, 647650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embry, M. R. (1975), ‘Orthogonality and the numerical range’, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 27, 405411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stampfli, J. G. (1966), ‘Extreme points of the numerical range of a hyponormal operator’, Michigan Math. J., 13, 87–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar