No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Henry Adams’s Protean Views of the American Empire, 1890–1905
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2022
Abstract
In the history of the Gilded Age and its geopolitics, Henry Adams has a reputation for being an imperialist. While not universally subscribed to by historians, this characterization has waxed sufficiently as to eclipse Adams’s more complex, even contradictory, record on the American Empire. The evidence I will marshal will not prove that Adams was actually an anti-imperialist, but it will reveal the protean nature of Adams’s views of the American Empire. To get a grip on this relatively unexamined aspect of Adams’s thought, I will analyze his correspondence during the last decade of the nineteenth century in which he criticized the extension of American power across the Pacific, particularly in regard to its political economy, religion, and civilization. With the onset of the American Filipino War, Adams raged at the news of American atrocities. This paper shows that Adams’s outrage was part of an incipient civilizational ideology, one that neither materialized into an attachment to the anti-imperialist cause nor accepted the vaunted superiority of the West. Even though Adams possessed no principle to guide his thinking on the empire, his pessimistic evaluation of the extension of American power is enough to reconsider his reputation as an imperialist.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era (SHGAPE)
References
Notes
1 Hofstadter, Richard, The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965), 163 Google Scholar.
2 Graff, Henry, ed., American Imperialism and the Philippine Insurrection: Testimony Taken from Hearings on Affairs in the Philippine Islands Before the Senate Committee on the Philippines (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1969), viiiGoogle Scholar.
3 Rowe, John Carlos, “Henry Adams’s Education in the Age of Imperialism” in New Essays on the Education of Henry Adams, ed. John Carlos Rowe, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Orr, John C., “I measured her as they did with pigs” in Henry Adams and the Need to Know , eds. William Merrill Decker, and Harbert, Earl N. (Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society, 2005), 276.Google Scholar
5 See Manheim, Daniel L., “The Voice of Arii Taimai: Henry Adams and the Challenge of Empire,” Biography 22 (Spring 1999): 209–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the consistent use of Adams as an anti-imperialist, see Healy, David, US Expansionism: The Imperialist Urge in the 1890s (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1970), passimGoogle Scholar.
6 Ninkovich, Frank, “The New Empire” in The Imperial Moment, ed. Kimberly Kagan, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010), 146 Google Scholar. Intellectuals’ support of empire included historians. See Marotta, Gary, “The Academic Mind and the Rise of US Imperialism: Historians and Economists as Publicists for Ideas of Colonial Expansion,” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 42 (April 1983): 217–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 For an opposing view, see Rowe, “Henry Adams’s Education in the Age of Imperialism,” 87–114.
8 Welch, Richard, Response to Imperialism: The United States and the Philippine-American War, 1899–1902 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1979), 43 Google Scholar.
9 Pervasive among Protestants, providentialism also distorted how some Catholics thought about war. See Wetzel, Benjamin, “A Church Divided: Roman Catholicism, Americanization, and the Spanish-American War,” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 14 (July 2015): 348–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Beveridge, Albert, The Meaning of the Times and Other Speeches (Washington, DC: Press of Judd and Detweiler, 1908), 56–57 Google Scholar. See also Anderson, Gerald H., “Providence and Politics behind Protestant Missionary Beginnings in the Philippines” in Studies in Philippine Church History, ed. Anderson, Gerald H. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1969), 279–300 Google Scholar.
11 Adams, Henry, The Education of Henry Adams (New York: The Modern Library, 1996), 34 Google Scholar.
12 Chalfant, Edward, Better in Darkness: A Biography of Henry Adams: His Second Life, 1862-1891 (Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1994), 69 Google Scholar; Representing Adams as adhering to a “philosophy of quasi-idealism” is Ernest Samuels, The Young Henry Adams (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1967), 17.
13 Much of the Protestant missionary activity in the Pacific originated in New England. See Dodge, Ernest S., New England and the South Seas (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965)Google Scholar.
14 Hutchison, William R., Errand to the World: American Protestant Thought and Foreign Missions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), 91 Google Scholar.
15 Hutchison, William R., “A Moral Equivalent for Imperialism: Americans and the Promotion of ‘Christian Civilization,’ 1880-1920” in Missionary Ideologies in the Imperialist Era: 1880–1920 , eds. Christensen, Torben and Hutchison, William R. (Denmark: Aros, 1982), 171 Google Scholar.
16 See, for example, volume 21 of Papers of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABC 19.1, reel 818, passim). At the time of my research in February 2020, the papers were housed in Harvard’s Lamont Library due to the renovation of Houghton Library.
17 ABC 19.1, reel 819, n.p. See also Bartlett, Samuel Colcord, Historical Sketch of the Hawaiian Mission (Boston: American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, 1869), 14ffGoogle Scholar.
18 MacKenzie, Kenneth M., The Robe and the Sword: The Methodist Church and the Rise of American Imperialism (Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press, 1961), 8Google Scholar.
19 At no point does Adams provide a neat definition of civilization, but it appears to refer to the sort of industrialization, commercialization, militarization, and overseas religious expansion seen in the Gilded Age.
20 See Charles Milnes Gaskell, Henry Adams, July 4, 1890 in The Letters of Henry Adams, 1886–1892 , vol. 3. eds. Levenson, J. C., Samuels, Ernest, Vandersee, Charles, and Winner, Viola Hopkins (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982), 248 Google Scholar. While Adams continued to mourn the suicide of his wife, these factors combined to impel him to seek the outside world. Further insight on the meaning of Adams’s travels can be found in Stowe, William W., “Henry Adams, Traveler,” The New England Quarterly 64 (June 1991): 179–205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Pierre Lagayette, “Henry Adams: Travel as Episteme” in Henry Adams and the Need to Know, 222–35.
21 Henry Adams to John Hay, Oct. 16, 1890 in Letters, Levenson et al., 3:302.
22 Henry Adams to John Hay, Feb. 8, 1891 in Letters, Levenson et al., 3:412.
23 Henry Adams to Clarence King, Apr. 22, 1891 in Letters, Levenson et al., 3:468.
24 Brown, David S., The Last American Aristocrat: The Brilliant Life and Improbable Education of Henry Adams (New York: Scribner, 2020), 256 Google Scholar; O’Toole, Patricia, The Five of Hearts: An Intimate Portrait of Henry Adams and His Friends, 1880–1918 (New York: Clarkson Potter, 1990), 247 Google Scholar.
25 Recently, scholars have pivoted away from “Cultural Imperialism” as an analytical category that signifies the total control of native civilizations by Western powers. See Porter, Andrew, “‘Cultural Imperialism’ and Protestant Missionary Enterprise, 1780–1914,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 25:3 (1997): 367–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Dunch, Ryan, “Beyond Cultural Imperialism: Cultural Theory, Christian Missions, and Global Modernity,” History and Theory 41 (October 2002): 301–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
26 This is strikingly true of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM). According to a recent study, the ABCFM stood in judgment of the Hawaiian society and was “convinced that profound social change was imperative.” Linnekin, Jocelyn, “New Political Orders” in Cambridge History of the Pacific Islanders , eds. Denoon, Donald, Firth, Stewart, Linnekin, Jocelyn, Meleisea, Malama, and Nero, Karen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 194 Google Scholar.
27 Henry Adams to Anna Cabot Mills Lodge, Oct. 21, 1890 in Letters, Levenson et al., 3:306. Both Adams and John La Farge recognized the hybrid nature of Samoan religion: technically, it was neither purely Samoan nor Anglo-Saxon, but a mixture of the two. For a discussion of syncretism, see La Farge, John, Reminiscences of the South Seas (New York: Doubleday, Page and Co., 1912), 129–30Google Scholar.
28 Henry Adams to John Hay, Mar. 2, 1891 in Letters, Levenson et al., 3:431–32.
29 Gunson, Niel, Messengers of Grace: Evangelical Missionaries in the South Seas, 1797–1860 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978)Google Scholar, 190. For a discussion of Hawaiian dance and music, see Buck, Elizabeth, Paradise Remade: The Politics of Culture and History in Hawaii (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1993), 112ffGoogle Scholar.
30 Gunson, Messengers of Grace, 189.
31 Preston, Andrew, Sword of the Spirit, Shield of Faith: Religion in American War and Diplomacy (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2012), 192 Google Scholar.
32 La Farge, Mabel, ed., Letters to a Niece: And Prayer to the Virgin of Chartres (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1920), 96 Google Scholar.
33 Peréz, Louis, The War of 1898: The United States and Cuba in History and Historiography (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998), 7Google Scholar.
34 Quoted in Samuels, Ernest, Henry Adams: The Major Phase (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1964), 161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
35 Independence of Cuba, United States Congress. Committee on Foreign Relations (Washington, DC, 1896), 2, Massachusetts Historical Society.
36 See Cirillo, Vincent J., “Fever and Reform: The Typhoid Epidemic in the Spanish-American War,” Journal of the History of Medicine and the Allied Sciences 55 (October 2000): 363–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
37 Henry Adams to John Hay, May 26, 1898 in The Letters of Henry Adams, 1892–1899, vol. 4, eds. J.C. Levenson, Ernest Samuels, Charles Vandersee, and Viola Hopkins Winner (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1988), 594.
38 Quoted in Healy, US Expansionism, 33.
39 Henry Adams to Worthington Chauncey Ford, Nov. 26, 1898 in Letters, Levenson et al., 4:624.
40 Henry Adams to Elizabeth Cameron, Jan. 15, 1899 in Letters, Levenson et al., 4:661.
41 Storey, Moorfield and Codman, Julian, Secretary Root’s Record: ‘Marked Severities’ in Philippine Warfare: An Analysis of the Law and Facts Bearing on the Action and Utterances of President Roosevelt and Secretary Root (Boston: George H. Ellis Co., 1902), 25 Google Scholar.
42 Quoted in De Bevoise, , Agents of Apocalypse: Epidemic Disease in the Colonial Philippines (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), 64 Google Scholar. Such testimony is corroborated by Birtle, Andrew J., “The US Army’s Pacification of Marinduque, Philippines Islands, April 1900–April 1901,” Journal of Military History 61 (April 1997): 255–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
43 Quoted in Linn, Brian McAllister, Guardians of Empire: The US Army and the Pacific, 1902–1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997), 14 Google Scholar. Scholars continue to disagree as to how representative Smith’s campaign in Samar might have been. One way of answering the question is by looking at the number of officers and enlisted men convicted of offenses against natives. Secretary of War Elihu Root produced a list of 349 American soldiers for the period 1898–1902. “The list included eleven convictions for murder or manslaughter, five attempted murders, ten rapes, twenty-two attempted sexual assaults of various types, four arsons, 102 assaults, 163 robberies or larcenies, twenty-six disturbances not involving physical assaults or thefts, and six misuses of military authority for personal gain.” John S. Reed, “External Discipline During Counterinsurgency: A Philippine War Case Study, 1900–1901,” Journal of American East-Asian Relations 4 (Spring 1995): 43 Google Scholar. Also, see the Henry Lodge Committee report: “Charges of Cruelty, etc., to the Natives of the Philippines,” 57th Cong., 1 sess. (1902), S Doc. 205, pt. 1; and “Trials of Courts-Martial in the Philippine Islands in Consequence of Certain Instructions,” 57th Cong., 2 sess. (1903), S Doc. 213.
44 May, Glenn Anthony, “Was the Philippine-American War a ‘Total War’?” in Anticipating Total War: The German and American Experiences, 1871–1914 , eds. Manfred F. Boemeke, , Chickering, Roger, and Forster, Stig (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 446 Google Scholar.
45 Quoted in Beisner, Robert L., Twelve Against Empire: The Anti-Imperialists, 1898–1900 (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1968), 44 Google Scholar.
46 Quoted in Welch, Richard J. Jr. “American Atrocities in the Philippines: The Indictment and the Response,” Pacific Historical Review 43 (May 1974): 234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
47 Quoted in Beisner, Twelve Against Empire, 78. For a recent study of Godkin, see Beaupre, Myles, “‘What Are the Philippines Going to Do to Us?’ E. L. Godkin on Democracy, Empire and Anti-Imperialism,” Journal of American Studies 46 (August 2012): 711–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
48 See Welch, “American Atrocities in the Philippines,” 233–53.
49 Twain’s criticism of all missionary work is explored by Alexander, Nathan G., “Unclasping the Eagle’s Talons: Mark Twain, American Freethought, and the Responses to Imperialism,” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 17 (July 2018): 524–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
50 Twain, Mark, “To the Person Sitting in Darkness,” North American Review 172 (1901): 164–65Google Scholar.
51 Twain’s reservations were typical of freethinkers in the Gilded Age. See Alexander, Nathan G., Race in a Godless World: Atheism, Race, and Civilization, 1850–1914 (New York: New York University Press, 2019), 84–114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
52 See Gianakos, Perry E., ed., George Ade’s “Stories of ‘Benevolent Assimilation’” (Quezon City, Philippines: New Day Publishers, 1985)Google Scholar.
53 Preston, Sword of the Spirit, 181–82; Clymer, Kenton J., Protestant Missionaries in the Philippines, 1898–1916: An Inquiry into the American Colonial Mentality (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1986), 174 Google Scholar; See The Moral and Religious Aspects of the So-called Imperial Policy: Discussed by Representative Clergymen of Many Denominations (Washington, DC: Anti-Imperialist League, 1899).
54 Donald, E. W. and Trueblood, B. F., eds., Ministers’ Meeting of Protest Against the Atrocities in the Philippines (Boston: Tremont Temple, 1902), 10 Google Scholar.
55 Henry Adams to Elizabeth Cameron, Nov. 29, 1898 in Letters, Levenson et al., 4:627.
56 Henry Adams to Elizabeth Cameron, Feb. 5, 1898 in Letters, Levenson et al., 4:680.
57 Henry Adams to Elizabeth Cameron, Dec. 4, 1898 in Letters, Levenson et al., 4:630.
58 That platform regarded the occupation of the Philippines as the denial of American liberty. See Cullinane, Michael Patrick, Liberty and American Anti-Imperialism, 1898–1909 (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Many anti-imperialists also worried that once begun, territorial expansion would propel the nation into other adventures and damage its republican ideals. See Tompkins, E. Berkeley, Anti-Imperialism in the United States: The Great Debate, 1890–1920 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970), passimCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
59 Henry Adams to Elizabeth Cameron, Jan. 22, 1898 in Letters, Levenson et al., 4:670.
60 Brooks Adams, Henry Adams, Nov, . 3, 1901 in The Letters of Henry Adams, 1899–1905 , vol. 5, eds. Levenson, J. C., Samuels, Ernest, Vandersee, Charles, and Winner, Viola Hopkins (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1988), 305 Google Scholar.
61 Henry Adams to Elizabeth Cameron, Jan. 22, 1899 in Letters, Levenson et al., 4:670.
62 Henry Adams to Brooks Adams, Feb. 7, 1901 in Letters, Levenson et al., 5:194. A few days later, Adams reported to Elizabeth Cameron that he had become an “anti-imperialist.” See Henry Adams to Elizabeth Cameron, Feb. 11, 1901 in Letters, Levenson et al., 5:198.
63 McCormick, Thomas J., China Market: America’s Quest for Informal Empire, 1893–1901 (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1967), 107 Google Scholar. McCormick’s interpretation follows that of Walter LaFeber, The New Empire: An Interpretation of American Expansion, 1860–1898 (New York: Cornell University Press, 1963). A more recent elaboration of this school of thought can be found in Jacobson, Matthew Frye, Barbarian Virtues: The United States Encounters Foreign Peoples at Home and Abroad, 1876–1917 (New York: Hill & Wang, 2000),Google Scholar chapter one.
64 Schirmer, Daniel B., Republic or Empire: American Resistance to the Philippine War (Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Co., 1972), 45–63 Google Scholar. Disagreeing with Schirmer is Welch, Response to Imperialism, 84ff.
65 Henry Adams to Elizabeth Cameron, Jan. 22, 1899 in Letters, Levenson et al., 4:670.
66 See Brown, Last American Aristocrat, 340.
67 See John Hay to Henry Adams, May 27, 1898 in Letters of John Hay and Extracts from Diary, vol. 3, ed. Clara S. Hay (Washington, DC, 1908), 126, Rare Books & Special Collections, University of Notre Dame.
68 Contosta, David R., “Henry Adams and the American Century” in Henry Adams and His World, eds. Contosta, David R. and Muccigrosso, Robert (Philadelphia: Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 1993), 39 Google Scholar.
69 Quoted in O’Toole, Five of Hearts, 318 (italics added). The Open Door to China appears to have been the subject of ongoing friendly disputation between Hays and Adams: In the spring of 1899, the secretary of state wrote the historian: “You are wrong, as usual, about the open door. It is wider than ever for us.” John Hay to Henry Adams, May 18, 1899 in John Hay Papers, 1783–1999, reel no. 3, Library of Congress. Hay was genuinely frustrated with how the American press covered the Open Door: He complained to Adams that the policy was regarded as too imperial for some but not imperial enough for others. See John Hay to Henry Adams, Sept. 25, 1900 in John Hay Papers, reel no. 3, Library of Congress.
70 A different type of civilizational ideology can be found in Brooks Adams, The Law of Civilization and Decay: An Essay on History (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1896). Among secondary sources, see Hoganson, Kristin, Fighting for American Manhood: How Gender Politics Provoked the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998)Google Scholar; An excellent source on the perils of attributing to writers a theory they do not possess can be found in Skinner, Quentin, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas,” History and Theory 8:1 (1969): 3–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
71 Adams, Henry, Tahiti (New York: Scholar’s Facsimiles and Reprints, 1947), 137–38Google Scholar.
72 Stannard, David E., “Disease and Infertility: A New Look at the Demographic Collapse of Native Populations in the Wake of Western Contact,” Journal of American Studies 24 (December 1990): 336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
73 On this last, see MacLennan, Carol A., Sovereign Sugar: Industry and Environment in Hawaii (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2014).Google Scholar
74 Henry Adams to Elizabeth Cameron, Feb. 6, 1891 in Letters, Levenson et al., 3:406–-407.
75 Cater, Harold Dean, Henry Adams and His Friends: A Collection of His Unpublished Letters (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1947), liiGoogle Scholar.
76 Henry Adams to Elizabeth Cameron, July 16, 1905 in Letters, Levenson et al., 5:692.
77 Contosta, David, Henry Adams and the American Experiment (Boston: Little, Brown, & Co., 1980), 133 Google Scholar.
78 See Samuels, Henry Adams: Major Phase, 289ff.
79 I have benefited from Orr’s commentary in “I measured her as they did with pigs,” 274ff.
80 Henry Adams to Elizabeth Cameron, May 24, 1891 in Letters, Levenson et al., 3:478.
81 Prominent examples include Strong, Josiah, Our Country (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Roosevelt, Theodore, The Strenuous Life: Essays and Addresses (New York: The Century Co., 1899)Google Scholar; Beveridge, Albert, The Meaning of the Times and Other Speeches (Washington, DC: Press of Judd and Detweiler, 1908)Google Scholar.
82 Quoted in Vaughan, Christopher A., “The ‘Discovery’ of the Philippines by the US Press, 1898–1902,” The Historian 57 (Winter 1995): 309 Google Scholar.
83 John Whiteclay Chambers, “The American Debate on Modern War, 1871–1914” in Anticipating Total War, 252.
84 Quoted in Kinzer, Stephen, The True Flag: Theodore Roosevelt, Mark Twain, and the Birth of American Empire (New York: Henry Holt and Co., 2017), 82 Google Scholar.
85 See Jacobson, Barbarian Virtues, 50–51.
86 Adams, John Alden, “The Wealth of the Philippines,” Munsey’s Magazine 19 (1898): 673 Google Scholar.
87 Quoted in May, Glen Anthony, Social Engineering in the Philippines: The Aims, Execution, and Impact of American Colonial Policy, 1900–1913 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1980), 142 Google Scholar.
88 Jones, W. A., “Why We Should Withdraw from the Philippines” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Lake Mohonk Conference of Friends of the Indian and Other Dependent Peoples (New York: Lake Mohonk Conference, 1907), 91 Google Scholar.
89 Stressing the uneven nature of economic progress is Owen, Norman G., Prosperity Without Progress: Manila Hemp and Material Life in the Colonial Philippines (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. More pessimistic though no less convincing is Tucker, Rufus S., “A Balance Sheet of the Philippines,” Harvard Business Review 8 (October 1929): 10–23 Google Scholar.
90 See Henry Adams to John Hay, Sept. 15, 1890 in Letters, Levenson et al., 3:282–83.
91 Henry Adams to John Hay, Nov. 2, 1901 in Letters, Levenson et al., 5:304 (italics added).
92 Insight into Adams’s “antipathy to war” can be found in Carter, Stephen D., “The Precise Issue: Henry Adams, Global War, and the Role of Force in American History,” The New England Quarterly 88 (December 2015): 555–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
93 See Leuchtenburg, William E., “Progressivism and Imperialism: The Progressive Movement and American Foreign Policy, 1898–1916,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 39 (December 1952): 483–504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Revising Leuchtenburg is Bernstein, Barton J. and Leib, Franklin A., “Progressive Republican Senators and American Imperialism, 1898–1916,” Mid-America: An Historical Review 50:1 (1968): 163–205 Google Scholar.
94 Love, Eric T., Race Over Empire: Racism and US Imperialism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004), 12 Google Scholar.