Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:16:00.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

APPROBATION AND THE DESIRE TO BETTER ONE'S CONDITION IN ADAM SMITH

When the desire to better one's condition does not better one's condition and society's condition ….

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

MARIA PIA PAGANELLI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 79 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cropsey, Joseph. 1957. Polity and Economy: With Further Thoughts on the Principles of Adam Smith. South Bend: St. Augustine's Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evensky, Jerry. 2005. Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel. 2004. On Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations: A Philosophical Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Forman-Barzilai, Fonna. 2006. “Smith on ‘connexion,’ culture and judgment.” In Schiesser, Eric and Montes, Leonidas, eds., New Voices on Adam Smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hanley, Ryan and Maria Pia, Paganelli. Forthcoming. “Adam Smith on Money, Mercantilism and the System of Natural Liberty.” In Carey, D., ed., Money and the Enlightenment. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Hueckel, Glenn. Forthcoming. “‘In the Heat of Writing’: Polemics and the ‘Error of Smith’ in the Matter of the Corn Bounty.” In Young, Jeffrey, ed., The Elgar Companion to Adam Smith. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Levy, David. 1995. “The Partial Spectator in the Wealth of Nations: A Robust Utilitarianism.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 2: 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, David. 1999. “Adam Smith's Katallatic Model of Gambling: Approbation from the Spectator.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 21: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montes, Leonidas. 2004. Adam Smith in Context: A Critical Reassessment of Some Central Components of His Thought. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otteson, James. 2002. Adam Smith's Marketplace of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paganelli, Maria Pia. 2006. “Vanity and the Daedalian Wings of Paper Money in Adam Smith.” In Schlieser, Eric and Montes, Leonidas, eds., New Voices on Adam Smith. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 271–289.Google Scholar
Paganelli, Maria Pia. 2008. “The Adam Smith Problem in Reverse: Self-Interest in Wealth of Nations and Theory of Moral Sentiments.” History of Political Economy 40 (2) (Summer): 365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters-Fransen, . 2000. “The Canon in the History of the Adam Smith Problem.” In Forget, Evelyn L. and Peart, Sandra, eds., Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Dennis. 2005 “Does ‘Bettering Our Condition’ Really Make Us Better off? Adam Smith on Progress and Happiness.” American Political Science Review 100 (3) (August): 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1968. “Adam Smith, Consumer Tastes, and Economic Growth.” The Journal of Political Economy 76 (3) (May–June): 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1990. “Adam Smith and the Stock of Moral Capital.” History of Political Economy 22 (1) (Spring): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Warren. 2007. “Some Preliminary Conclusion on the Use of the Concept of the Invisible Hand.” Working paper presented at the June 2007 HES conference.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1981.Google Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 1975. “The Transitional Gain Trap.” Bell Journal of Economics 6 (2) (Autumn): 671–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1927. “Adam Smith and Laissez Faire.” Journal of Political Economy. 35 (2) (April): 196–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Edwin. 1996. “Adam Smith on the Cultural Effects of Specialization: Splenetics versus Economics.” History of Political Economy 28 (1) (Spring): 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweynert, Joachim and Goldschmidt, Nils. 2006. “The Two Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe as Processes of Institutional Transplantation.” Journal of Economic Issues XL (4) (December): 895–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar