Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:53:17.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE MADMAN AND THE ECONOMIST(S): GEORGES BATAILLE AND FRANÇOIS PERROUX AS FRENCH CRITIQUES OF THE MARSHALL PLAN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2022

Raphaël Fèvre Open the ORCID record for Raphaël Fèvre [Opens in a new window]
Raphaël Fèvre*
Affiliation:
Raphaël Fèvre: Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS—GREDEG. Email: raphael.fevre@univ-cotedazur.fr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper deals with the initial reception of the Marshall Plan by Georges Bataille and François Perroux in light of the discussion they held in the journal Critique, during the second half of 1948. I argue that Bataille and Perroux took the Marshall Plan as an enigma that current economic and political theories were not able to explain fully. In response, both authors contributed a unique and sophisticated economic analysis to transcend what they perceived as the limited scope of economics. By focusing on this interdisciplinary dialogue, this paper is intended as a contribution to a history of economic thought, taking in the economic inquiry of non-economists and the ways in which they relate to professional economists.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 344 - 369
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the History of Economics Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I received valuable feedback and suggestions on previous versions of this paper during the twenty-third ESHET Annual Conference (Lille, May 2019) and the Charles Gide Workshop (Montreal, June 2019). Many thanks also to Nicolas Brisset, Cléo Chassonnery-Zaïgouche, Bianca Fontana, Stefanos Geroulanos, Duncan Kelly, Harro Maas, and Linsey McGoey for their rich and helpful comments. I am especially grateful to Michele Bee for insightful remarks and for always being so willing to discuss my research. I am also indebted to the two anonymous referees and to Pedro Duarte for their valuable suggestions.

References

REFERENCES

Fonds Critique / Jean Piel [JPL], Institut de la Mémoire et de l’Édition Contemporaine (IMEC), Caen, France.Google Scholar
Fonds François Perroux [PRX], Institut de la Mémoire et de l’Édition Contemporaine (IMEC), Caen, France.Google Scholar
Fonds Georges Bataille [NAF 28086], Département des Manuscrits de la Bibliothèque Nationale de France (BNF), Paris, France.Google Scholar
Alcouffe, Alain, and le Bris, David. 2020. “Technical Progress and Structural Change in Jean Fourastié’s Theory of Development.” History of Political Economy 52 (1): 101–33.Google Scholar
Amadae, Sonia M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arena, Richard. 2000. “Les Économistes Français En 1950.” Revue Économique 51 (5): 969–1007.Google Scholar
Arena, Richard, Dow, Sheila C., and Klaes, Matthias, eds. 2009. Open Economics: Economics in Relation to Other Disciplines. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, Richard, and Schmidt, Christian. 1999. “Keynes before and after the General Theory: The Theoretical Contents of French Economists’ Reactions, 1929–1949.” In Schefold, B. and Pasinetti, L., eds., The Impact of Keynes on Economics in the 20th Century. London: Edward Elgar, pp. 73–98.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1948. Le grand schisme. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Aron, Robert, and Dandieu, Arnaud. 1931. Le Cancer américain. Mayenne: Éditions Rieder.Google Scholar
Aron, Robert, and Dandieu, Arnaud. 1933. La révolution nécessaire. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Baby, Jean. 1948. “L’impérialisme Américain et La France.” Cahiers du Communisme 25 (1): 83–97.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Boianovsky, Mauro. 2016. “Secular Stagnation: The History of a Macroeconomic Heresy.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (6): 946–970.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. 1948a. “Réponse (Discussion sur l’aide Américaine).” Critique 4 (31): 1056.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. 1948b. “Vers La Fin de La Guerre?” Critique 4 (29): 931–938.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. 1949. “The Marshall Plan.” The Times Literary Supplement, no. 2450, p. 35.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. 1970–1988. Œuvres Complètes. Volumes I (Hollier, Denis, ed.), VII, XI, and XII (Ronse, Henri and Rey, Jean-Michel, eds.). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bee, Michele. 2021. “Économie de la transmission : Péguy après Walras.” Revue de l’OFCE 171 (1): 67–107.Google Scholar
Bossuat, Gérard. 1999. “Aux Origines Du Plan Marshall.” Histoire, Économie et Société 18 (2): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisset, Nicolas, and Fèvre, Raphaël. 2020a. “The ‘Community of Labour’ in Troubled Times (1926–1944): François Perroux’s Irrational Foundations of Economic Expertise.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27 (5): 735–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisset, Nicolas, and Fèvre, Raphaël. 2020b. “The Vichy Opportunity: Perroux’s Institutional and Intellectual Entrepreneurship.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 38 (B): 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisset, Nicolas, and Fèvre, Raphaël. 2021. “Peregrinations of a Corporatist Economist: François Perroux’s Travels in Fascist Europe.” History of Political Economy 53 (4): 745–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldari, Katia. 2018. “Alfred Marshall and François Perroux: The Neglected Liaison.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (11): 134–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chassagnon, Virgile. 2015. “Economic Power and the Institutions of Capitalism: Reappraising the Legacy of François Perroux.” Journal of Economic Issues 49 (1): 157–177.Google Scholar
Clark, Colin. 1942. The Economics of 1960. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin. 2006. “Du corporatisme au keynésianisme. Continuités pratiques et ruptures symboliques dans le sillage de François Perroux.” Revue française de science politique 56 (4): 555–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Antonin. 2012. De Vichy à la Communauté européenne. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin. 2018. “Why Call It a ‘European Community’? Ideological Continuities and Institutional Design of Nascent European Organisations.” Contemporary European History 27 (2): 326–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couzon, Isabelle. 2003. “‘Les espaces économiques’ de François Perroux (1950).” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 9: 81–102.Google Scholar
Cunha, Alexandre M. 2020. “Postwar Third-Way Perspectives: François Perroux on National Income and Planning.” History of Political Economy 52 (4): 653–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daladier, Édouard. 1948. “Vassalité ou Fédération.” Hommes et Mondes 6 (23): 169–176.Google Scholar
Dandurand, Guy. 1998. “‘La Part Maudite’, de Georges Bataille. Pour une lecture du paradoxe.” Littérature 111: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dard, Olivier. 1999. “Théoriciens et praticiens de l’économie : un changement de paradigme.” In Berstein, S. and Milza, P., eds., L’année 1947. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, pp. 75–114.Google Scholar
DeLong, Bradford J., and Eichengreen, Barry. 1993. “The Marshall Plan: History’s Most Successful Structural Adjustment Program.” In Dornbusch, R., Nolling, W., and Layard, R., eds, Postwar Economic Reconstruction and Lessons for the East Today. Cambridge, London: MIT Press, pp. 189–230.Google Scholar
De March, François. 2015. “La Part Maudite. Un ‘Non Savoir’ Économique ?” In Limousin, C. and Poirier, J., eds., “La Part Maudite” de Georges Bataille : La dépense et l’excès. Paris: Classiques Garnier, pp. 119–134.Google Scholar
Dockès, Pierre. 2015. “Les débats sur la stagnation séculaire dans les années 1937–1950.” Revue économique 66 (5): 967–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Nigel. 2016. The Social Life of Money. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Domarchi, Jean. 1943. La pensée économique de John-Maynard Keynes et son influence en Angleterre. Paris: Domat-Montchrestien.Google Scholar
Domarchi, Jean. 1948. “Discussion sur le Plan Marshall. Du ‘plein emploi’ au Plan Marshall.” Les Temps Modernes 29: 1345–1371.Google Scholar
Drake, David. 2002. Intellectuals and Politics in Post-War France. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufourt, Daniel. 2009. “L’avènement d’une épistémologie politique dans l’œuvre de François Perroux.” Économie et Société—Série M 33 (3): 419–447.Google Scholar
Erickson, Paul, Klein, Judy L., Daston, Lorraine, Lemov, Rebecca, Sturm, Thomas, and Gordin, Michael D.. 2013. How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourastié, Jean. 1948. “Les États-Unis pourront-ils tenir les engagements prévus par le Plan Marshall?” Esprit 144 (4): 562–574.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourquet, François. 1980. Les Comptes de la Puissance. Paris: Ed. Recherches.Google Scholar
Frachon, Benoit. 1948. “Une étape de la lutte des classes en France : Les grandes grèves de novembre-décembre 1947.” Cahiers du Communisme 25 (1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Fraisse, Paul. 1948. “Les Français face à leurs responsabilités.” Esprit 144 (4): 623–631.Google Scholar
Geroulanos, Stefanos. 2011. “Heterogeneities, Slave-Princes, and Marshall Plans: Schmitt’s Reception in Hegel’s France.” Modern Intellectual History 8 (3): 531–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giscard d’Estaing, Edmond. 1949. “Le Plan Marshall et les États-Unis.” Revue de Paris 56 (12): 137–145.Google Scholar
Goguel, François. 1948. “Le Plan Marshall devant les partis français.” Esprit 144 (4): 619–622.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Craufurd D. 2001. “The Value of Things in the Imaginative Life: Microeconomics in the Bloomsbury Group.” History of Economics Review 34 (1): 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Alvin Harvey. 1947. Economic Policy and Full Employment. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Higgins, Benjamin. 1946. “The Doctrine of Economic Maturity.” American Economic Review 36 (1): 133–141.Google Scholar
Jouvenel, Bertrand, de. 1948. “Le Plan Marshall et les États-Unis.” Revue de Paris 55 (2): 140–148.Google Scholar
Judt, Tony. 1992. Past Imperfect: French Intellectuals, 1944–1956. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, Stuart. 2016. “Expenditure.” In Hewson, Mark and Coelen, Marcus, eds., Georges Bataille: Key Concepts. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 75–87.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. [1936] 1973. The General Theory . In Johnson, E. and Moggridge, D., eds., The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Volume VII. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kojève, Alexandre. 1949. “Les origines, le but, la situation actuelle et les perspectives d’avenir de l’Organisation Européenne de Coopération Économique.” France-Illustration, September 24.Google Scholar
Lacorne, Denis. 2005. “Anti-Americanism and Americanophobia: A French Perspective.” In Lacorne, D. and Judt, T., eds., With Us or Against Us: Studies in Global Anti-Americanism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffitte, Jean. 1948. “La signification du Plan Marshall et la marshallisation de la France.” Cahiers du Communisme 25 (10): 1110–1126.Google Scholar
Lebret, Louis-Jean. 1948. “Comprendre le Plan Marshall.” Économie et Humanisme (mai–juin).Google Scholar
Lefèvre, Jennifer. 2003. “Men of Ideas, Men of Action: French Intellectuals’ Impact on Post-War Politics.” Journal of European Studies 33 (2): 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limousin, Christian. 2015. “Chronologie : Georges Bataille, La Part maudite et ses alentours jusqu’à nos jours.” In Limousin, C. and Poirier, J., eds., “La Part Maudite” de Georges Bataille: La dépense et l’excès. Paris: Classiques Garnier, pp. 43–75.Google Scholar
Loubet del Bayle, Jean-Louis. 1969. Les non-conformistes des années 30. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Lynch, Frances M. B. 1984. “Resolving the Paradox of the Monnet Plan: National and International Planning in French Reconstruction.” Economic History Review 37 (2): 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcel, Jean-Christophe. 2003. “Bataille and Mauss: A Dialogue of the Deaf?” Economy and Society 32 (1): 141–152.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert, and Perroux, François. 1969. François Perroux interroge Herbert Marcuse … qui répond. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. [1924] 2002. The Gift. London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGoey, Linsey. 2018. “Bataille and the Sociology of Abundance: Reassessing Gifts, Debt and Economic Excess.” Theory, Culture & Society 35 (4–5): 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mounier, Emmanuel. 1948. “Déclaration de Guerre.” Esprit 150 (11): 603–607.Google Scholar
Mouric, Joël. 2019. Raymond Aron et l’Europe. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Nord, Philip G. 2010. France’s New Deal. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patron, Sylvie. 2000. Critique, 1946–1996 : une encyclopédie de l’esprit moderne. Paris: Éditions de l’IMEC.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1940. Autarcie et expansion : empire ou empires ? Paris: Librairie de Médicis.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1947a. “Ésquisse d’une théorie de l’économie dominante.” Économie Appliquée. Archives de l’ISEA: 243–300.Google Scholar
Perroux, François, ed. 1947b. Le Revenu national : son calcul et sa signification. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1948a. “Discussion sur l’aide américaine.” Critique 4 (31): 1052–1055.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1948b. Le Plan Marshall ou l’Europe nécessaire au monde. Paris: Librairie de Médicis.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1949. Les comptes de la Nation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1950a. “Economic Space: Theory and Applications.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 64 (1): 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perroux, François. 1950b. “The Domination Effect and Modern Economic Theory.” Social Research 17 (2): 188–206.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1971. “La Part Maudite et le Silence.” L’Arc 44: 42–47.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1946a. “Du capitalisme au socialisme selon Schumpeter.” Critique 1 (3–4): 317–324.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1946b. “Les recettes économiques de Beveridge.” Critique 1 (2): 148–155.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1947. “Vers une économie mondiale fondée sur le don ?” Critique 2 (17): 343–352.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1948a. La fortune américaine et son destin. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1948b. “Les prophéties de Colin Clark à l’épreuve des faits.” Critique 3 (24): 457–465.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1950. “La politique américaine de soutien des prix agricoles.” Revue Économique 1 (4): 480–493.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1967. “Introduction. Bataille et le monde.” In Bataille, Georges, La part maudite ; précédé de La notion de dépense. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1986. La rencontre et la différence. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1995. “Bataille and the World from ‘The Notion of Expenditure’ to the Accursed Share.” In Boldt-Irons, L. A., ed., On Bataille: Critical Essays. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 95–106.Google Scholar
Rabier, Jacques-René. 1948. “Plan Monnet et Plan Marshall.” Esprit 144 (4): 575–597.Google Scholar
Richman, Michèle. 1990. “Bataille Moralist? Critique and the Postwar Writings.” Yale French Studies 78: 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 1989. “The Development of Keynesianism in France.” In Hall, P. A., ed., The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 171–194.Google Scholar
Rueff, Jacques. 1949. “L’état actuel du système des paiements internationaux.” Revue d’Economie Politique 59 (2): 145–165.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm, and Morgan, Mary S., eds. 1998. “From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism.” History of Political Economy (ann. suppl.). Durham, London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sabot, Philippe. 2012. “Bataille, entre Kojève et Queneau : Le désir et l’Histoire.” Le Portique. Revue de Philosophie et de Sciences Humaines 29: 1–13.Google Scholar
Sampaio, Guilherme. 2016. “The Translation, Diffusion, and Reception of John Maynard Keynes’s Writings in France (1920s–50s).” PhD thesis, European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
Sandretto, René. 2009. “François Perroux: A Precursor of the Current Analyses of Power.” Journal of World Economic Review 5 (1): 57–68.Google Scholar
Scot, Marie. 2016. “L’antiaméricanisme dans la vie intellectuelle française.” In Charle, C. and Jeanpierre, L., eds., La Vie Intellectuelle En France. De 1914 à nos jours. Paris: Seuil, pp. 381–386.Google Scholar
Soria, Georges. 1948. La France deviendra-t-elle une colonie américaine ? Paris: Éditions du Pavillon.Google Scholar
Steil, Benn. 2018. The Marshall Plan: Dawn of the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stoekl, Allan. 1997. “Bataille, Gift Giving, and the Cold War.” In Schrift, A. D., ed., The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. New York: Routledge, pp. 245–255.Google Scholar
Surya, Michel, ed. 1997. George Bataille. Choix de lettres : 1917–1962. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Surya, Michel. 2002. Georges Bataille: An Intellectual Biography. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Terborgh, George. 1945. The Bogey of Economic Maturity. Chicago: Machinery and Allied Products Institute.Google Scholar
Thérien, Jean-Philippe. 2002. “Debating Foreign Aid: Right versus Left.” Third World Quarterly 23 (3): 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillon, Charles. 1948. “Le Plan Marshall, abandon de l’indépendance française et de la défense nationale.” Cahiers du Communisme 25 (5): 476–494.Google Scholar
Uri, Pierre. 1948. “Discussion sur le Plan Marshall. Une Stratégie Économique.” Les Temps Modernes 34: 12–41.Google Scholar
Vaïsse, Maurice. 1992. “Le général de Gaulle et la défense de l’Europe, 1947–1958.” Matériaux pour l’histoire de notre temps 29 (1): 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Véran, André. 1948. “Visages américains du Plan Marshall.” Esprit 144 (4): 541–554.Google Scholar
Vernant, Jacques. 1949. “Une interprétation du Plan Marshall : François Perroux, Jean Piel, et Georges Bataille.” Politique Étrangère 14 (6): 575–580.Google Scholar
Winock, Michel. 1990. “The Cold War.” In Lacorne, D., Rupnik, J., and Toinet, M-F, eds., The Rise and Fall of Anti-Americanism: A Century of French Perception. London: Macmillan, pp. 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winock, Michel. 1996. “ Esprit”, des intellectuels dans la cité : 1930–1950. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Fonds Critique / Jean Piel [JPL], Institut de la Mémoire et de l’Édition Contemporaine (IMEC), Caen, France.Google Scholar
Fonds François Perroux [PRX], Institut de la Mémoire et de l’Édition Contemporaine (IMEC), Caen, France.Google Scholar
Fonds Georges Bataille [NAF 28086], Département des Manuscrits de la Bibliothèque Nationale de France (BNF), Paris, France.Google Scholar
Alcouffe, Alain, and le Bris, David. 2020. “Technical Progress and Structural Change in Jean Fourastié’s Theory of Development.” History of Political Economy 52 (1): 101–33.Google Scholar
Amadae, Sonia M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arena, Richard. 2000. “Les Économistes Français En 1950.” Revue Économique 51 (5): 969–1007.Google Scholar
Arena, Richard, Dow, Sheila C., and Klaes, Matthias, eds. 2009. Open Economics: Economics in Relation to Other Disciplines. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, Richard, and Schmidt, Christian. 1999. “Keynes before and after the General Theory: The Theoretical Contents of French Economists’ Reactions, 1929–1949.” In Schefold, B. and Pasinetti, L., eds., The Impact of Keynes on Economics in the 20th Century. London: Edward Elgar, pp. 73–98.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1948. Le grand schisme. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Aron, Robert, and Dandieu, Arnaud. 1931. Le Cancer américain. Mayenne: Éditions Rieder.Google Scholar
Aron, Robert, and Dandieu, Arnaud. 1933. La révolution nécessaire. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Baby, Jean. 1948. “L’impérialisme Américain et La France.” Cahiers du Communisme 25 (1): 83–97.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Boianovsky, Mauro. 2016. “Secular Stagnation: The History of a Macroeconomic Heresy.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (6): 946–970.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. 1948a. “Réponse (Discussion sur l’aide Américaine).” Critique 4 (31): 1056.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. 1948b. “Vers La Fin de La Guerre?” Critique 4 (29): 931–938.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. 1949. “The Marshall Plan.” The Times Literary Supplement, no. 2450, p. 35.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. 1970–1988. Œuvres Complètes. Volumes I (Hollier, Denis, ed.), VII, XI, and XII (Ronse, Henri and Rey, Jean-Michel, eds.). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bee, Michele. 2021. “Économie de la transmission : Péguy après Walras.” Revue de l’OFCE 171 (1): 67–107.Google Scholar
Bossuat, Gérard. 1999. “Aux Origines Du Plan Marshall.” Histoire, Économie et Société 18 (2): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisset, Nicolas, and Fèvre, Raphaël. 2020a. “The ‘Community of Labour’ in Troubled Times (1926–1944): François Perroux’s Irrational Foundations of Economic Expertise.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27 (5): 735–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisset, Nicolas, and Fèvre, Raphaël. 2020b. “The Vichy Opportunity: Perroux’s Institutional and Intellectual Entrepreneurship.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 38 (B): 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisset, Nicolas, and Fèvre, Raphaël. 2021. “Peregrinations of a Corporatist Economist: François Perroux’s Travels in Fascist Europe.” History of Political Economy 53 (4): 745–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldari, Katia. 2018. “Alfred Marshall and François Perroux: The Neglected Liaison.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (11): 134–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chassagnon, Virgile. 2015. “Economic Power and the Institutions of Capitalism: Reappraising the Legacy of François Perroux.” Journal of Economic Issues 49 (1): 157–177.Google Scholar
Clark, Colin. 1942. The Economics of 1960. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin. 2006. “Du corporatisme au keynésianisme. Continuités pratiques et ruptures symboliques dans le sillage de François Perroux.” Revue française de science politique 56 (4): 555–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Antonin. 2012. De Vichy à la Communauté européenne. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin. 2018. “Why Call It a ‘European Community’? Ideological Continuities and Institutional Design of Nascent European Organisations.” Contemporary European History 27 (2): 326–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couzon, Isabelle. 2003. “‘Les espaces économiques’ de François Perroux (1950).” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 9: 81–102.Google Scholar
Cunha, Alexandre M. 2020. “Postwar Third-Way Perspectives: François Perroux on National Income and Planning.” History of Political Economy 52 (4): 653–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daladier, Édouard. 1948. “Vassalité ou Fédération.” Hommes et Mondes 6 (23): 169–176.Google Scholar
Dandurand, Guy. 1998. “‘La Part Maudite’, de Georges Bataille. Pour une lecture du paradoxe.” Littérature 111: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dard, Olivier. 1999. “Théoriciens et praticiens de l’économie : un changement de paradigme.” In Berstein, S. and Milza, P., eds., L’année 1947. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, pp. 75–114.Google Scholar
DeLong, Bradford J., and Eichengreen, Barry. 1993. “The Marshall Plan: History’s Most Successful Structural Adjustment Program.” In Dornbusch, R., Nolling, W., and Layard, R., eds, Postwar Economic Reconstruction and Lessons for the East Today. Cambridge, London: MIT Press, pp. 189–230.Google Scholar
De March, François. 2015. “La Part Maudite. Un ‘Non Savoir’ Économique ?” In Limousin, C. and Poirier, J., eds., “La Part Maudite” de Georges Bataille : La dépense et l’excès. Paris: Classiques Garnier, pp. 119–134.Google Scholar
Dockès, Pierre. 2015. “Les débats sur la stagnation séculaire dans les années 1937–1950.” Revue économique 66 (5): 967–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Nigel. 2016. The Social Life of Money. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Domarchi, Jean. 1943. La pensée économique de John-Maynard Keynes et son influence en Angleterre. Paris: Domat-Montchrestien.Google Scholar
Domarchi, Jean. 1948. “Discussion sur le Plan Marshall. Du ‘plein emploi’ au Plan Marshall.” Les Temps Modernes 29: 1345–1371.Google Scholar
Drake, David. 2002. Intellectuals and Politics in Post-War France. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufourt, Daniel. 2009. “L’avènement d’une épistémologie politique dans l’œuvre de François Perroux.” Économie et Société—Série M 33 (3): 419–447.Google Scholar
Erickson, Paul, Klein, Judy L., Daston, Lorraine, Lemov, Rebecca, Sturm, Thomas, and Gordin, Michael D.. 2013. How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourastié, Jean. 1948. “Les États-Unis pourront-ils tenir les engagements prévus par le Plan Marshall?” Esprit 144 (4): 562–574.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourquet, François. 1980. Les Comptes de la Puissance. Paris: Ed. Recherches.Google Scholar
Frachon, Benoit. 1948. “Une étape de la lutte des classes en France : Les grandes grèves de novembre-décembre 1947.” Cahiers du Communisme 25 (1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Fraisse, Paul. 1948. “Les Français face à leurs responsabilités.” Esprit 144 (4): 623–631.Google Scholar
Geroulanos, Stefanos. 2011. “Heterogeneities, Slave-Princes, and Marshall Plans: Schmitt’s Reception in Hegel’s France.” Modern Intellectual History 8 (3): 531–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giscard d’Estaing, Edmond. 1949. “Le Plan Marshall et les États-Unis.” Revue de Paris 56 (12): 137–145.Google Scholar
Goguel, François. 1948. “Le Plan Marshall devant les partis français.” Esprit 144 (4): 619–622.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Craufurd D. 2001. “The Value of Things in the Imaginative Life: Microeconomics in the Bloomsbury Group.” History of Economics Review 34 (1): 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Alvin Harvey. 1947. Economic Policy and Full Employment. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Higgins, Benjamin. 1946. “The Doctrine of Economic Maturity.” American Economic Review 36 (1): 133–141.Google Scholar
Jouvenel, Bertrand, de. 1948. “Le Plan Marshall et les États-Unis.” Revue de Paris 55 (2): 140–148.Google Scholar
Judt, Tony. 1992. Past Imperfect: French Intellectuals, 1944–1956. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, Stuart. 2016. “Expenditure.” In Hewson, Mark and Coelen, Marcus, eds., Georges Bataille: Key Concepts. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 75–87.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. [1936] 1973. The General Theory . In Johnson, E. and Moggridge, D., eds., The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Volume VII. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kojève, Alexandre. 1949. “Les origines, le but, la situation actuelle et les perspectives d’avenir de l’Organisation Européenne de Coopération Économique.” France-Illustration, September 24.Google Scholar
Lacorne, Denis. 2005. “Anti-Americanism and Americanophobia: A French Perspective.” In Lacorne, D. and Judt, T., eds., With Us or Against Us: Studies in Global Anti-Americanism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffitte, Jean. 1948. “La signification du Plan Marshall et la marshallisation de la France.” Cahiers du Communisme 25 (10): 1110–1126.Google Scholar
Lebret, Louis-Jean. 1948. “Comprendre le Plan Marshall.” Économie et Humanisme (mai–juin).Google Scholar
Lefèvre, Jennifer. 2003. “Men of Ideas, Men of Action: French Intellectuals’ Impact on Post-War Politics.” Journal of European Studies 33 (2): 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limousin, Christian. 2015. “Chronologie : Georges Bataille, La Part maudite et ses alentours jusqu’à nos jours.” In Limousin, C. and Poirier, J., eds., “La Part Maudite” de Georges Bataille: La dépense et l’excès. Paris: Classiques Garnier, pp. 43–75.Google Scholar
Loubet del Bayle, Jean-Louis. 1969. Les non-conformistes des années 30. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Lynch, Frances M. B. 1984. “Resolving the Paradox of the Monnet Plan: National and International Planning in French Reconstruction.” Economic History Review 37 (2): 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcel, Jean-Christophe. 2003. “Bataille and Mauss: A Dialogue of the Deaf?” Economy and Society 32 (1): 141–152.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert, and Perroux, François. 1969. François Perroux interroge Herbert Marcuse … qui répond. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. [1924] 2002. The Gift. London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGoey, Linsey. 2018. “Bataille and the Sociology of Abundance: Reassessing Gifts, Debt and Economic Excess.” Theory, Culture & Society 35 (4–5): 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mounier, Emmanuel. 1948. “Déclaration de Guerre.” Esprit 150 (11): 603–607.Google Scholar
Mouric, Joël. 2019. Raymond Aron et l’Europe. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Nord, Philip G. 2010. France’s New Deal. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patron, Sylvie. 2000. Critique, 1946–1996 : une encyclopédie de l’esprit moderne. Paris: Éditions de l’IMEC.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1940. Autarcie et expansion : empire ou empires ? Paris: Librairie de Médicis.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1947a. “Ésquisse d’une théorie de l’économie dominante.” Économie Appliquée. Archives de l’ISEA: 243–300.Google Scholar
Perroux, François, ed. 1947b. Le Revenu national : son calcul et sa signification. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1948a. “Discussion sur l’aide américaine.” Critique 4 (31): 1052–1055.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1948b. Le Plan Marshall ou l’Europe nécessaire au monde. Paris: Librairie de Médicis.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1949. Les comptes de la Nation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1950a. “Economic Space: Theory and Applications.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 64 (1): 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perroux, François. 1950b. “The Domination Effect and Modern Economic Theory.” Social Research 17 (2): 188–206.Google Scholar
Perroux, François. 1971. “La Part Maudite et le Silence.” L’Arc 44: 42–47.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1946a. “Du capitalisme au socialisme selon Schumpeter.” Critique 1 (3–4): 317–324.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1946b. “Les recettes économiques de Beveridge.” Critique 1 (2): 148–155.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1947. “Vers une économie mondiale fondée sur le don ?” Critique 2 (17): 343–352.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1948a. La fortune américaine et son destin. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1948b. “Les prophéties de Colin Clark à l’épreuve des faits.” Critique 3 (24): 457–465.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1950. “La politique américaine de soutien des prix agricoles.” Revue Économique 1 (4): 480–493.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1967. “Introduction. Bataille et le monde.” In Bataille, Georges, La part maudite ; précédé de La notion de dépense. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1986. La rencontre et la différence. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Piel, Jean. 1995. “Bataille and the World from ‘The Notion of Expenditure’ to the Accursed Share.” In Boldt-Irons, L. A., ed., On Bataille: Critical Essays. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 95–106.Google Scholar
Rabier, Jacques-René. 1948. “Plan Monnet et Plan Marshall.” Esprit 144 (4): 575–597.Google Scholar
Richman, Michèle. 1990. “Bataille Moralist? Critique and the Postwar Writings.” Yale French Studies 78: 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 1989. “The Development of Keynesianism in France.” In Hall, P. A., ed., The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 171–194.Google Scholar
Rueff, Jacques. 1949. “L’état actuel du système des paiements internationaux.” Revue d’Economie Politique 59 (2): 145–165.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm, and Morgan, Mary S., eds. 1998. “From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism.” History of Political Economy (ann. suppl.). Durham, London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sabot, Philippe. 2012. “Bataille, entre Kojève et Queneau : Le désir et l’Histoire.” Le Portique. Revue de Philosophie et de Sciences Humaines 29: 1–13.Google Scholar
Sampaio, Guilherme. 2016. “The Translation, Diffusion, and Reception of John Maynard Keynes’s Writings in France (1920s–50s).” PhD thesis, European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
Sandretto, René. 2009. “François Perroux: A Precursor of the Current Analyses of Power.” Journal of World Economic Review 5 (1): 57–68.Google Scholar
Scot, Marie. 2016. “L’antiaméricanisme dans la vie intellectuelle française.” In Charle, C. and Jeanpierre, L., eds., La Vie Intellectuelle En France. De 1914 à nos jours. Paris: Seuil, pp. 381–386.Google Scholar
Soria, Georges. 1948. La France deviendra-t-elle une colonie américaine ? Paris: Éditions du Pavillon.Google Scholar
Steil, Benn. 2018. The Marshall Plan: Dawn of the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stoekl, Allan. 1997. “Bataille, Gift Giving, and the Cold War.” In Schrift, A. D., ed., The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. New York: Routledge, pp. 245–255.Google Scholar
Surya, Michel, ed. 1997. George Bataille. Choix de lettres : 1917–1962. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Surya, Michel. 2002. Georges Bataille: An Intellectual Biography. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Terborgh, George. 1945. The Bogey of Economic Maturity. Chicago: Machinery and Allied Products Institute.Google Scholar
Thérien, Jean-Philippe. 2002. “Debating Foreign Aid: Right versus Left.” Third World Quarterly 23 (3): 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillon, Charles. 1948. “Le Plan Marshall, abandon de l’indépendance française et de la défense nationale.” Cahiers du Communisme 25 (5): 476–494.Google Scholar
Uri, Pierre. 1948. “Discussion sur le Plan Marshall. Une Stratégie Économique.” Les Temps Modernes 34: 12–41.Google Scholar
Vaïsse, Maurice. 1992. “Le général de Gaulle et la défense de l’Europe, 1947–1958.” Matériaux pour l’histoire de notre temps 29 (1): 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Véran, André. 1948. “Visages américains du Plan Marshall.” Esprit 144 (4): 541–554.Google Scholar
Vernant, Jacques. 1949. “Une interprétation du Plan Marshall : François Perroux, Jean Piel, et Georges Bataille.” Politique Étrangère 14 (6): 575–580.Google Scholar
Winock, Michel. 1990. “The Cold War.” In Lacorne, D., Rupnik, J., and Toinet, M-F, eds., The Rise and Fall of Anti-Americanism: A Century of French Perception. London: Macmillan, pp. 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winock, Michel. 1996. “ Esprit”, des intellectuels dans la cité : 1930–1950. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar