Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:48:25.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MILTON FRIEDMAN IN CHILE: SHOCK THERAPY, ECONOMIC FREEDOM, AND EXCHANGE RATES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2020

Sebastian Edwards  and
Leonidas Montes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We analyze Milton Friedman’s two visits to Chile, in March 1975 and November 1981. We rely on a number of sources, including Friedman’s archives, press archives in Chile and the rest of the world, interviews, and the papers and recollections of some of those who accompanied Friedman during his meeting with Pinochet. Although Friedman’s 1975 visit has been widely discussed, his 1981 visit has been largely neglected. However, this visit was particularly important as it preceded a severe currency and banking crisis, stemming from an overvalued fixed exchange rate. The crisis put at risk the influence of the “Chicago Boys” and the political and economic liberalization process. We analyze Friedman’s views regarding Chile’s pegged exchange rate strategy followed between 1979 and 1982, and his position on economic and political freedom.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 105 - 132
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Sebastian Edwards is the Henry Ford II Professor of International Economics at the University of California, Los Angeles; and Leonidas Montes is the director of Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP) and professor at Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez (UAI), Chile. This paper has much benefitted from detailed comments from three referees. We are grateful to the editors for helping us produce a more focused final version, and to one referee for the challenging comments. We also thank Douglas Irwin, Edward Nelson, Deirdre McCloskey, and Rodrigo Vergara for help and comments, and Arnold Harberger, Rolf Lüders, Sergio de Castro, and Carlos Langoni for sharing with us their recollections of Friedman’s first visit, including his meeting with Pinochet. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Craufurd Goodwin, who encouraged this research.

References

REFERENCES

Ahumada, José Miguel. 2019. “The Chilean Military Dictatorship and the Origins of Peripheral Growth.” In The Political Economy of Peripheral Growth. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arancibia, Patricia, and Balart, Francisco. 2007. Sergio de Castro. El arquitecto del modelo económico chileno. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Biblioteca Americana.Google Scholar
Bockman, Johanna. 2019. “Democratic Socialism in Chile and Peru: Revisiting the ‘Chicago Boys’ as the Origin of Neoliberalism.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 61 (3): 654–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brender, Maria. 2010. “Economic Transformations in Chile: The Formation of the Chicago Boys.” American Economist 55 (1): 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce, and Montes, Leonidas. 2015. “Friedrich Hayek and His Visits to Chile.” Review of Austrian Economics 28 (3): 261–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Timothy David. 2017. “Rethinking Chile’s ‘Chicago Boys’: Neoliberal Technocrats or Revolutionary Vanguard?” Third World Quarterly 38 (6): 1350–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Timothy David. 2018. “The Paradox of the Neoliberal Developmentalist State: Reconstructing the Capitalist Elite in Pinochet’s Chile.” In Dominant Elites in Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbo, Vittorio. 1993. “Economic Reforms in Chile: An Overview.” Documento de Trabajo Nº 160, Instituto de Economía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Cornish, Selwyn. 2016. “Monetary Targeting in Australia. Problems of Control and Prediction.” In Cord, R. A. and Hammond, J. D., eds., Milton Friedman: Contributions to Economics and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, pp. 3434–3455.Google Scholar
De Castro, Sergio. 1992. El Ladrillo. Bases de la Política Económica del Gobierno Militar Chileno. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos.Google Scholar
De la Cuadra, Sergio, and Valdés, Salvador. 1992. “Myths and Facts about Financial Liberalization in Chile: 1974–1982.” In Brock, Philip Lawton, ed., If Texas Were Chile: A Primer on Banking Reform. Sequoia Seminar Publication. San Francisco: ICS Press, pp. 11–101.Google Scholar
De Gregorio, José. 2005. “Crecimiento Económico en Chile: Evidencia, Fuentes y Perspectivas.” Revista de Estudios Públicos 98: 19–86.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I. 1997. Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian. 1984. “Estabilización con Liberalización: Diez años del Experimento Chileno con Políticas de Mercado Libre 1973–1983.” Revista de Estudios Públicos 14: 1–39.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian. 2010. Left Behind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian, and Cox, Alejandra. [1987] 1991. Monetarism and Liberalization. The Chilean Experiment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Karin. 2009. “The Influence of Neoliberals in Chile before, during, and after Pinochet.” In Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter, eds., The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 305–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, Arturo. 1988. Los Economistas y el Presidente Pinochet. Santiago de Chile: Empresa Editora Zig-Zag.Google Scholar
Forder, James. 2018a. “What Was the Message of Friedman’s Presidential Address to the American Economic Association?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 42 (2): 523–541.Google Scholar
Forder, James. 2018b. “Why Is Labour Market Adjustment So Slow in Friedman’s Presidential Address?” Review of Keynesian Economics 6 (4): 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forder, James. 2019. Milton Friedman. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forder, James, and Sømme, Kardin. Forthcoming. “Explaining the Fame of Friedman’s Presidential Address.” Cambridge Journal of Economics.Google Scholar
Foxley, Alejandro. 1980. “Hacia una Economía de Libre Mercado: Chile 1974–1979.” Colección Estudios Cieplan 4: 5–37.Google Scholar
Frank, Andre Gunder. 1976. Economic Genocide in Chile: Equilibrium on the Point of Bayonet. Nottingham: Spokesman Books.Google Scholar
Frazer, William J. 1988. Power and Ideas: Milton Friedman and the Big U-Turn. Volumes I and II. Gainesville: Gulf/Atlantic Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates.” In Friedman, M., ed., Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 157–203.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1973. Money and Economic Development: The Horowitz Lectures of 1972. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1975. Milton Friedman en Chile: bases para un desarrollo económico. Santiago: Fundación de Estudios Económicos BHC.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1976a. “The Line We Dare Not Cross.” Encounter 47 (5): 8–14.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1976b. “The Fragility of Freedom.” In Milton Friedman in South Africa. Cape Town: Graduate School of Business of the University of Cape Town, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. [1976] 1992. Inflation and Unemployment. In Lindbeck, A., ed., Nobel Lectures, Economics 1969–1980. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 234–248.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1977. “The Path We Dare Not Take.” Reader’s Digest (March): 110–115.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1982. “Sistema Monetario para una Sociedad Libre.” Revista de Estudios Públicos 6: 165–178.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1992. “Chile and Israel: Identical Policies—Opposite Outcomes.” In Friedman, Milton, ed., Money Mischief: Episodes in Monetary History. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp. 234–248.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 2012. Un Legado de Libertad Milton Friedman en Chile. Santiago: Instituto Democracia y Mercado.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, and Friedman, Rose D.. 1998. Two Lucky People: Memoirs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, and Mundell, Robert. 2001. “One World, One Money?” Policy Options—Montreal 22(4): 10–19.Google Scholar
Glick, Philip M. 1957. The Administration of Technical Assistance: Growth in the Americas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grandin, Greg. 2006. Empire’s Workshop: Latin America, the United States, and the Rise of New Imperialism. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Hachette, Dominique, and Lüders, Rolf. 1993. Privatization in Chile: An Economic Appraisal. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Daniel. 2003. “Remembering Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25: 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. Daniel. 2013. “Markets, Politics, and Democracy at Chicago: Taking Economics Seriously.” In van Horn, Robert, Mirowski, Philip, and Stapleford, Thomas, eds., Building Chicago Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 36–66.Google Scholar
Harberger, Arnold. 2016. “Sense and Economics: An Oral History with Arnold Harberger.” Interviews conducted by Paul Burnett in 2015 and 2016. Copyright © 2016 by The Regents of the University of California.Google Scholar
Hira, Anil. 1998. “How Ideas Affect Economic Policy in Developing Countries: Two Case Studies from Latin America.” PhD diss. Ann Arbor, UMI Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar
Hoover, D. Kevin, and Sheffrin, Steven M., eds. 1995. Monetarism and the Methodology of Economics: Essays in Honour of Thomas Mayer. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A. 2015. Free Trade under Fire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A. 2018. “The Midway and Beyond: Recent Work on Economics at Chicago.” History of Political Economy 50 (4): 735–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kedar, Claudia. 2019. “The International Monetary Fund and the Chilean Chicago Boys, 1973–7: Cold Ties between Warm Ideological Partners.” Journal of Contemporary History 54 (1): 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Naomi. 2007. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Klein, Naomi. 2010. “Milton Friedman Did Not Save Chile.” The Guardian, March 10, 2010. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/mar/03/chile-earthquake. Accessed October 31, 2019.Google Scholar
Letelier, Orlando. 1976. “The Chicago Boys in Chile: Economic Freedom’s Awful Toll.” The Nation 223 (28): 137–142.Google Scholar
Marcel, Mario. 1988. “Privatización y finanzas públicas. El caso de Chile 1985–88.” Colección Estudios Cieplan 26: 5–60.Google Scholar
Medina, Eden. 2011. Cybernetic Revolutionaries: Technology and Politics in Allende’s Chile. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip, and Stapleford, Thomas A.. 2011. Building Chicago Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1977. “The Nobel Prize in Economic Science.” Challenge 20: 50–52.Google Scholar
Montes, Leonidas. 2016. “Milton Friedman y sus visitas a Chile.” Revista de Estudios Públicos 141: 121–171.Google Scholar
Nelson, Edward. 2018. Seven Fallacies Concerning Milton Friedman’s “The Role of Monetary Policy.” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2018-013. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puryear, Jeffrey M. 1994. Thinking Politics: Intellectuals and Democracy in Chile, 1973–1988. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rosende, Francisco. 2007a. La escuela de Chicago-una mirada histórica a 50 años del convenio Chicago/Universidad Católica. Ensayos en honor a Arnold C. Harberger. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Rosende, Francisco. 2007b. “Chicago Economics II. Del triunfo de las ideas a la crisis de los Chicago Boys en Chile.” In Cerda, Rodrigo, ed., Una mirada histórica a 50 años del convenio Chicago/Universidad Católica. Ensayos en honor a Arnold C. Harberger. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
Ross, Emmett B., ed. 2010. The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ruger, William. 2011. Milton Friedman. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. 2010. “Friedman, Positive Economics, and the Chicago Boys.” In Ross, Emmett B., ed., The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 175–195.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. 1996. The State and Capital in Chile: Business Elites, Technocrats, and Market Economics. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sjaastad, Larry A. 1983. "Failure of Economic Liberalism in the Cone of Latin America." World Economy 6 (1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, Juan Gabriel. 1995. Pinochet´s Economists: The Chicago Boys in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Horn, Rob., 2009. “Business Conservatives and the Mont Pèlerin Society.” In Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter, eds., The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. With a new preface. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Horn, Rob, Mirowski, Philip, and Stapleford, Thomas A.. 2011. Building Chicago Economics: New Perspectives on the History of America’s Most Powerful Economics Program. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar