Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:13:53.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Instantons beyond topological theory. I

Part of: Quantum field theory; related classical field theories General mathematical topics and methods in quantum theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2011

E. Frenkel ,
A. Losev  and
N. Nekrasov
E. Frenkel
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA (frenkel@math.berkeley.edu)
A. Losev
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, B. Cheremushkinskaya 25, Moscow 117259, Russia (aslosev2@gmail.com)
N. Nekrasov
Affiliation:
Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, 35, Route de Chartres, Bures-sur-Yvette, F-91440, France (nikitastring@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many quantum field theories in one, two and four dimensions possess remarkable limits in which the instantons are present, the anti-instantons are absent, and the perturbative corrections are reduced to one-loop. We analyse the corresponding models as full quantum field theories, beyond their topological sector. We show that the correlation functions of all, not only topological (or BPS), observables may be studied explicitly in these models, and the spectrum may be computed exactly. An interesting feature is that the Hamiltonian is not always diagonalizable, but may have Jordan blocks, which leads to the appearance of logarithms in the correlation functions. We also find that in the models defined on Kähler manifolds the space of states exhibits holomorphic factorization. We conclude that in dimensions two and four our theories are logarithmic conformal field theories.

In Part I we describe the class of models under study and present our results in the case of one-dimensional (quantum mechanical) models, which is quite representative and at the same time simple enough to analyse explicitly. Part II will be devoted to supersymmetric two-dimensional sigma models and four-dimensional Yang–Mills theory. In Part III we will discuss non-supersymmetric models.

Keywords

instantonquantum mechanicstopological field theoryMorse theorytempered distributionEpstein–Glaser regularization

MSC classification

Secondary: 81Q35: Quantum mechanics on special spaces 81T40: Two-dimensional field theories, conformal field theories, etc.
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu , Volume 10 , Special Issue 3: A Special Issue in Honour of Louis Boutet de Monvel and Pierre Schapira , July 2011 , pp. 463 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Atiyah, M., New invariants of 3- and 4-dimensional manifolds, in The Mathematical Heritage of Hermann Weyl, Durham, NC, 1987, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Volume 48, pp. 285–299 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1988).Google Scholar
2.Baulieu, L. and Singer, I., The topological sigma model, Commun. Math. Phys. 125 (1989), 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Baulieu, L., Losev, A. and Nekrasov, N., Target space symmetries in topological theories, I, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2002), 021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Berkovits, N., Super Poincaré covariant quantization of the superstring, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2000), 018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Bhanot, G. and David, F., The phases of the O(3) σ-model for imaginary , Nucl. Phys. B251 (1985), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bialynicki–Birula, A., Some theorems on actions of algebraic groups, Annals Math. 98 (1973), 480–497.Google Scholar
7.Bialynicki–Birula, A., Some properties of the decompositions of algebraic varieties determined by actions of a torus, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 24 (1976), 667–674.Google Scholar
8.Carrell, J. B. and Sommese, A. J., ℂ*-actions, Math. Scand. 43 (1978), 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Cohen, R. and Norbury, P., Morse field theory, preprint (math.GT/0509681).Google Scholar
10.Cordes, S., Moore, G. and Ramgoolam, S., Lectures on 2D Yang–Mills theory, equivariant cohomology and topological field theory, in Géométries Fluctuantes en Mécanique Statistique et en Théorie des Champs, Les Houches, 1994, pp. 505–682 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1996).Google Scholar
11.David, F., Instanton condensates in two-dimensional CPn−1 models, Phys. Lett. B138 (1984), 139–144Google Scholar
12.Deligne, P., Griffiths, P., Morgan, J. and Sullivan, D., Real homotopy theory of Käahler manifolds, Invent. Math. 29 (1975), 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Epstein, H. and Glaser, V., The role of locality in perturbation theory, Annales Inst. H. Poincaré 19(3) (1973), 211–295.Google Scholar
14.Feigin, B. and Frenkel, E., Affine Kac–Moody algebras and semi-infinite flag manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 128 (1990), 161–189.Google Scholar
15.Floer, A., Symplectic fixed points and holomorphic spheres, Commun. Math. Phys. 120 (1989), 575–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Frankel, T., Fixed points and torsion on Käahler manifolds, Annals Math. 70 (1959), 1–8.Google Scholar
17.Frenkel, E., Lectures on the Langlands Program and conformal field theory, in Frontiers in number theory, physics and geometry, Volume II (ed. Cartier, P. et al. ), pp. 387–536 (Springer, 2007) (preprint: hep-th/0512172).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Frenkel, E. and Losev, A., Mirror symmetry in two steps: A–I–B, Commun. Math. Phys. 269 (2007), 39–86 (preprint: hep-th/0505131).Google Scholar
19.Fukaya, K., Morse homotopy, A∞ category and Floer homologies, preprint (available at www.math.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~fukaya/).Google Scholar
20.Gelfand, I. M. and Shilov, G. E., Generalized functions, Volume I (Academic Press 1964).Google Scholar
21.Helffer, B., Semi-classical analysis for the Schrödinger operator and applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Volume 1336 (Springer, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Helffer, B. and Nier, F., Hypoelliptic estimates and spectral theory for Fokker–Planck operators and Witten Laplacians, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Volume 1862 (Springer, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Hörmander, L., The analysis of linear partial differential operators, I, Distribution theory and Fourier analysis (Springer, 2003).Google Scholar
24.Kapustin, A., Chiral de Rham complex and the half-twisted sigma-model, preprint (hep-th/0504074).Google Scholar
25.Kashiwara, M. and Schapira, P., Sheaves on manifolds (Springer, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Kempf, G., The Grothendieck–Cousin complex of an induced representation, Adv. Math. 29 (1978), 310–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Krotov, D. and Losev, A., Quantum field theory as effective BV theory from Chern–Simons, preprint (hep-th/0603201).Google Scholar
28.Losev, A. and Polyubin, I., Topological quantum mechanics for physicists, JETP Lett. 82 (2005), 335–342.Google Scholar
29.Losev, A., Marshakov, A. and Zeitlin, A., On first order formalism in string theory, Phys. Lett. B 633 (2006), 375–381 (preprint: hep-th/0510065).Google Scholar
30.Lysov, V., Anticommutativity equation in topological quantum mechanics, JETP Lett. 76 (2002), 724–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Malikov, F., Schechtman, V. and Vaintrob, A., Chiral de Rham complex, Commun. Math. Phys. 204 (1999), 439–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Nekrasov, N., Lectures on curved beta–gamma systems, pure spinors, and anomalies, preprint (hep-th/0511008).Google Scholar
33.Nekrasov, N., Seiberg–Witten prepotential from instanton counting, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 (2004), 831–864.Google Scholar
34.Nekrasov, N. and Okounkov, A., Seiberg–Witten theory and random partitions, preprint (hep-th/0306238).Google Scholar
35.Schomerus, V. and Saleur, H., The GL(1|1) WZW model: from supergeometry to logarithmic CFT, Nucl. Phys. B734 (2006), 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Schwarz, A., A-model and generalized Chern–Simons theory, Phys. Lett. B620 (2005), 180–186 (preprint: hep-th/0501119).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Tan, M.-C., Two-dimensional twisted sigma models and the theory of chiral differential operators, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 10 (2006), 759–851 (preprint: hep-th/0604179).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Witten, E., Supersymmetry and Morse theory, J. Diff. Geom. 17 (1982), 661–692.Google Scholar
39.Witten, E., Holomorphic Morse inequalities, in Algebraic and Differential Topology, Leipzig, 1984 (ed. Rassias, G.), Teubner-Texte zur Mathematik, Volume 70, pp. 318–333 (Teubner, Leipzig, 1985).Google Scholar
40.Witten, E., Topological quantum field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 117 (1988), 353–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Witten, E., Topological sigma models, Commun. Math. Phys. 118 (1988), 411–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Witten, E., Mirror manifolds and topological field theory, in Essays on mirror manifolds (ed. Yau, S.-T.), pp. 120–158 (International Press, 1992).Google Scholar
43.Witten, E., Chern–Simons gauge theory as a string theory, Progr. Math. 133 (1995), 637–678.Google Scholar
44.Witten, E., Two-dimensional models with (0, 2) supersymmetry: perturbative aspects, preprint (hep-th/0504078).Google Scholar
45.Witten, E., A note on the Chern–Simons and Kodama wavefunctions, preprint (gr-qc/0306083).Google Scholar
46.Wu, S., On the instanton complex of holomorphic Morse theory, Commun. Analysis Geom. 11 (2003), 775–807.Google Scholar