Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:28:14.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

76 Cross-Cultural Utility of Performance Validity Indicators in a Community Sample from Kampala, Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

Abigail Baird*
Affiliation:
Texas Woman’s University, Denton, TX, USA. Neurocognitive Specialty Group, Houston, TX, USA
Cesilia Mejia
Affiliation:
Neurocognitive Specialty Group, Houston, TX, USA
Jane Booth
Affiliation:
Neurocognitive Specialty Group, Houston, TX, USA
Robert Collins
Affiliation:
Neurocognitive Specialty Group, Houston, TX, USA
Nicholas Wisdom
Affiliation:
Neurocognitive Specialty Group, Houston, TX, USA
*
Correspondence: Abigail Baird, Texas Woman’s University (abaird2@twu.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Empirical support for inclusion of performance validity testing (PVTs) in neuropsychological assessment continues to grow (Sweet et al., 2021). However, considerable validation is still needed to understand the impact of culturally mediated factors on the reliability of current, commonly used PVTs to accurately classify effort among various cultural groups. This study sought to contribute to the literature by examining the utility of several PVTs in a non-clinical, community-dwelling sample in Kampala, Uganda.

Participants and Methods:

Participants included 52 residents (25 Female, 27 Male) who were born between 1953-2003 from the Wabigalo community of central Kampala. Individuals were recruited by community leaders and volunteered to participate. All 52 participants were administered the Dot Counting Test (DCT; Boone et al., 2002), Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM; Tombaugh, 1997), and Rey 15-Item Memorization Test (Rey 15; Lezak, 1995). Twenty-five participants also completed Green’s Non-Verbal Medical Symptom Validity Test (NV-MSVT; Green, 2006). Data from three participants was excluded due to suspected memory concerns. Instructions for all tests were translated into Luganda by a professional translator with experience in Luganda and were administered by Luganda-speaking individuals.

Results:

Using test manual-derived cut scores, 71.4% (n = 35) participants scored in the invalid range on the DCT, 10.2% (n = 5) produced total combined scores in the invalid range on Rey 15, 6.1% (n = 3) failed TOMM Trial 2, and one participant (4.3%) exceeded cut-offs on Green’s NV-MSVT.

Conclusions:

In this non-clinical sample, manual cutoffs for DCT contributed to a high type-1 error rate. These findings suggest that culturally mediated factors may contribute to differences in engagement or performance on DCT. Future studies should explore these factors and continue to examine the utility of widely used tests in diverse samples.

Type
Poster Session 08: Assessment | Psychometrics | Noncredible Presentations | Forensic
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023