Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:03:13.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of divided attention on implicit and explicit memory performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164

Abstract

This study explored the nature of the relationship between attention available at learning and subsequent implicit and explicit memory performance. One hundred neurologically normal subjects rated their liking of target words on a five-point scale. Half of the subjects completed the word-rating task in a full attention condition and the other half performed the task in a divided attention condition. Following administration of the word-rating task, all subjects completed five memory tests, three implicit (category association, tachistoscopic identification, and perceptual clarification) and two explicit (semantic-cued recall and graphemic-cucd recall), each bearing on a different subset of the list of previously presented target words. The results revealed that subjects in the divided attention condition performed significantly more poorly than subjects in the full attention condition on the explicit memory measures. In contrast, there were no significant group differences in performance on the implicit memory measures. These findings suggest that the attention to an episode that is necessary to produce later explicit memory may differ from that necessary to produce unconscious influences. The relationship between implicit memory, neurologic injury, and automatic processes is discussed. (JINS, 1996, 2, 111–125.)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, C.M.B. & Craik, F.I.M. (1974). The effect of concurrent task on recall from primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 107113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A.D. & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Brouwer, G. (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation, (Vol. 8, pp. 4790). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A.D., Scott, D., Drynan, R., & Smith, J. (1969). Short-term memory and the limited capacity hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 5155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartz, W.H. & Salchi, M. (1970). Interference in short- and long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 380382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battig, W.F. & Montague, W.E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80, (3, Pt. 2) 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet, B. & Murdock, B. (1965). Effects of subsidiary task on short-term memory. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 413419.Google Scholar
Bentin, S., Moscovitch, M., & Heth, l. (1992). Memory with and without awareness: Performance and electrophysiological evidence of savings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 12701283.Google ScholarPubMed
Blaxton, T.A. (1989). Investigating dissociation among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657668.Google Scholar
Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt-Plunnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butters, N., Salmon, D.R, Heindel, W., & Granholm, E. (1988). Episodic, semantic, and procedural memory: Some comparisons of Alzheimer and Huntington disease patients. In Terry, R.D. (Ed.), Aging and the brain (pp. 6387). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Cermak, L.S., Verfaellie, M., Butler, T., & Jacoby, L.L. (1993). Attributions of familiarity in amnesia: Evidence from a fame judgment task. Neuropsychology, 7, 510518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eich, E. (1984). Memory for unattended events: Remembering with and without awareness. Memory and Cognition, 12, 105111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.Google Scholar
Fahy, J.F., Marks, W., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Long, C.J. (1995). Dissociations among memory tests following severe closed head injury: Memory systems theory versus a processing account. Paper presented at the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
Gardiner, J.M. & Parkin, A.J. (1990). Attention and recollecttive experience in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 579583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graf, P. & Schacter, D.L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 501518.Google ScholarPubMed
Greene, R.L. (1986). Word stems as cues in recall and completion tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 663674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haist, F., Musen, G., & Squire, L.R. (1991). Intact priming of words and nonwords in amnesia. Psychobiology, 19,275285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, S.B. (1990). Level-of-processing effects in conceptually driven tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 970977.Google Scholar
Hasher, L. & Zacks, R.T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, K.J. & Johnston, W.A. (1991). Long-term perceptual memory for briefly exposed words as a function of awareness and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 807815.Google ScholarPubMed
Heindel, W.C., Salmon, D.P., Shults, C.W., Walicke, P.A., & Butters, N. (1989). Neuropsychological evidence for multiple implicit memory systems: A comparison of Alzheimer's, Huntington's, and Parkinson's disease patients. The Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 582587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L.L., Toth, J.P., & Yonelinas, A.P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L.L. & Witherspoon, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 300324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L.L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joordens, S. & Merikle, P.M. (1993). Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 4, 462467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, M.M., Gabrieli, J.D.E., Fennema, A.C., Growdon, J.H., & Corkin, S. (1991). Evidence for a dissociation between perceptual and conceptual priming in Alzheimer's disease. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 326342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kueera, H. & Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Moscovitch, M. (1994). Cognitive resources and dual-task interference effects at retrieval in normal people: The role of the frontal lobes and medial temporal cortex. Neuropsychology, 8, 524534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, M.J. & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attcntional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, D.C., Smith, A.D., Dudley, W.N., & Lafronza, V.N. (1989). Effects of age and a divided attention task presented during encoding and retrieval on memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitionz, 15, 11851191.Google Scholar
Parkin, A.J., Reid, T.K., & Russo, R. (1990). On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 507514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkin, A.J. & Russo, R. (1990). Implicit and explicit memory and the automatic/effortful distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 7180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perruchet, P. & Baveux, P. (1989). Correlational analyses of explicit and implicit memory performance. Memory and Cognition, 17, 7786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H.L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 10431056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H.L. & Blaxton, T.A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word fragment completion. Memory and Cognition, 15, 379388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, W.A., Bertus, E.L., & Gilbert, D.K. (1994). Dual-task assessment of age differences in automatic process development. Psychology and Aging, 9, 398413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schacter, D.L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501518.Google Scholar
Schacter, D.L. (1990). Perceptual representation systems and implicit memory: Toward a resolution of the multiple memory systems debate. In Diamond, A. (Ed.), Development and neural bases of higher cognitive function (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 608, pp. 543571). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Schacter, D.L. (1992a). Priming and multiple memory systems: Perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 244256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schacter, D.L. (1992b). Understanding implicit memory: A cognitive neuroscience approach. American Psychologist, 47, 559569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, R.M. & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimamura, A.P. (1986). Priming effect in amnesia: Evidence for a dissociable memory function. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 619644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E.R. & Branscombe, N.R. (1988). Category accessibility as implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 490504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, L.R., Shimamura, A.P., & Graf, P. (1987). Strength and duration of priming effect in normal subjects and amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia, 25, 195210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinivas, K. & Roediger, H.L. (1990). Classifying implicit memory tests: Category association and anagram solution. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 389412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E. & Schacter, D.L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tulving, E., Schacter, D.L., & Stark, H. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 8, 336342.Google Scholar
Warrington, E.K. & Weiskrantz, L. (1974). The effect of prior learning on subsequent retention in amnesic patients. Neuro-psychology, 12, 419428.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Weldon, M.S. & Jackson-Barrett, J.L. (1993). Why do pictures produce priming on the word-fragment completion test? A study of encoding and retrieval factors. Memory and Cognition, 21, 519528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witherspoon, D. & Moscovitch, M. (1989). Stochastic independence between two implicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 2230.Google Scholar