Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:34:41.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neurocognitive Speed and Inconsistency in Parkinson's Disease with and without Incipient Dementia: An 18-Month Prospective Cohort Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2012

Cindy M. de Frias ,
Roger A. Dixon  and
Richard Camicioli
Cindy M. de Frias*
Affiliation:
School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas
Roger A. Dixon
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Richard Camicioli
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Cindy M. de Frias, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080. E-mail: cdefrias@utdallas.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examined two-wave longitudinal changes in two indicators of neurocognitive speed (i.e., mean rate, intraindividual variability) using one simple and three complex reaction time tasks. Participants included idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, with and without incipient dementia, and normal controls. At baseline, there were 45 patients (26 men, 19 women) with idiopathic PD who ranged from 65 to 84 years (M = 71.3; SD = 4.5) and 47 matched controls (27 men, 20 women) who ranged from 65 to 84 years (M = 71.4; SD = 4.9). The 18-month longitudinal sample comprised of 74 returning participants (43 controls; 31 PD patients) who had no cognitive impairment or dementia at both waves. Ten of the 31 PD patients returning for Time 3 had dementia or cognitive impairment. These constituted the PD with incipient dementia (PDID) group. Repeated measures analyses of variance showed that the PD and PDID groups were slower over time on the reaction time tasks, whereas the controls improved their performance over time on all tasks. Inconsistency distinguished the two clinical groups (i.e., the PDID group but not the PD group became more inconsistent over time). Changes in neurocognitive speed and inconsistency may be valid clinical markers of PDID. (JINS, 2012, 18, 1–9)

Keywords

Parkinson's diseaseAgingIntraindividual variabilitySpeedLongitudinal studyReaction time
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , July 2012 , pp. 764 - 772
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsland, D., Zaccai, J., Brayne, C. (2005). A systematic review of prevalence studies in dementia in Parkinson's disease. Movements Disorders, 20, 1255–1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anstey, K.J., Mack, H.A., Christensen, H., Li, S.-C., Reglade-Meslin, C., Maller, J., Sachdev, P. (2007). Corpus callosum size, reaction time speed and variability in mild cognitive disorders and in normative sample. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1911–1920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellgrove, M.A., Hester, R., Garavan, H. (2004). The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: Evidence from a response inhibition task. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1910–1916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bielak, A.A., Hultsch, D.F., Strauss, E., MacDonald, S.W., Hunter, M.A. (2010). Intraindividual variability is related to cognitive change in older adults: Evidence for within-person coupling. Psychology and Aging, 25, 575–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, J.R., Spreen, O. (1989). Predicting premorbid IQ: A revision of the National Adult Reading Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, T.P., Malykhin, N., Martin, W.R.W., Hanstock, C.C., Emery, D.J., Fisher, N.J.Camicioli, R.M. (2008). Age and dementia-associated atrophy predominates in the hippocampal head and amygdala in Parkinson's disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 29, 1027–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, G.G., Rahill, A.A., Gorell, J.M., McDonald, C., Brown, S.J., Sillanpaa, M. (1999). Validity of the Dementia Rating Scale in assessing cognitive function in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 12, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, C.L., Strauss, E., Hultsch, D.F., Moll, A., Hunter, M.A. (2006). Intraindividual variability as a marker of neurological dysfunction: A comparison of Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camicioli, R., Gee, M., Bouchard, T.P., Fisher, N.J., Hanstock, C.C., Emery, D.J., Martin, W.R. (2009). Voxel-based morphometry reveals extra-nigral atrophy patterns associated with dopamine refractory cognitive and motor impairment in parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Related Disorders, 15, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camicioli, R., Sabino, J., Gee, M., Bouchard, T., Fisher, N., Hanstock, C., Martin, W.R. (2011). Ventricular dilatation and brain atrophy in patients with Parkinson's disease with incipient dementia. Movement Disorders, 26, 1443–1450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camicioli, R.C., Weiler, M., de Frias, C.M., Martin, W.R. (2008). Early, untreated Parkinson's disease patients show reaction time variability. Neuroscience Letters, 441, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, L.F., Long, C.J. (1996). Visual reaction time and its relationship to neuropsychological test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 613–623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, D.B., Lacritz, L.H., Weiner, M.F., Rosenberg, R.N., Cullum, C.M. (2004). Category fluency in mild cognitive impairment: Reduced effect of practice in test-retest conditions. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 18, 120–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawford, T., Goodrich, S., Henderson, L., Kennard, C. (1989). Predictive responses in Parkinson's disease: Manual key presses and saccadic eye movements to regular stimulus events. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 52, 1033–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deary, I.J., Der, G. (2005). Reaction time, age, and cognitive ability: Longitudinal findings from age 16 to 63 years in representative population samples. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 12, 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.A., Garrett, D.D., Lentz, T.L., MacDonald, S.W., Strauss, E., Hultsch, D.F. (2007). Neurocognitive markers of cognitive impairment: Exploring the roles of speed and inconsistency. Neuropsychology, 21, 381–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, B., Slachevsky, A., Litvan, I., Pillon, B. (2000). The FAB: A Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology, 55, 1621–1626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duchek, J.M., Balota, D.A., Tse, C.-S., Holtzman, D.M., Fagan, A.M., Goate, A.M. (2009). The utility of intraindividual variability in selective attention tasks as an early marker for Alzheimer's Disease. Neuropsychology, 23, 746–758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duff, K., Beglinger, L.J., Schultz, S.K., Moser, D.J., McCaffrey, R.J., Haase, R.F., Paulsen, J.S. (2007). Practice effects in the prediction of long-term cognitive outcome in three patient samples: A novel prognostic index. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., McHugh, P.R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fozard, J.L., Vercryssen, M., Reynolds, S.L., Hancock, P.A., Quilter, R.E. (1994). Age differences and changes in reaction time: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Journal of Gerontology, 49, P179–P189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Frias, C.M., Dixon, R.A., Fisher, N., Camicioli, R. (2007). Intraindividual variability in neurocognitive speed: A comparison of Parkinson's disease and normal older adults. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2499–2507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvin, J.E., Pollack, J., Morris, J.C. (2006). Clinical phenotype of Parkinson disease dementia. Neurology, 67, 1605–1611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gancher, S.T. (1997). Scales for the assessment of movement disorders. In R.M. Herndon (Ed.), Handbook of neurologic rating scales (pp. 81–106). New York: Demos Vermande.Google Scholar
Garrett, D.D., Kovacevic, N., McIntosh, A.R., Grady, C.L. (2010). Blood oxygen level-dependent signal variability is more than just noise. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 4914–4921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibb, W.R., Lees, A.J. (1988). The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 51, 745–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, C.G., LeWitt, P.A., Weidenman, M. (2003). Standardized training tools for the UPDRS activities of daily living scale: Newly available teaching program. Movement Disorders, 18, 1455–1458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorus, E., De Raedt, R., Lambert, M., Lemper, J.C., Mets, T. (2008). Reaction times and performance variability in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 28, 204–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, P., Meara, J. (2004). Risk and incidence of dementia in a cohort of older subjects with Parkinson's disease in the United Kingdom. Movement Disorders, 19, 1043–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoehn, M.M., Yahr, M.D. (1967). Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology, 17, 427–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultsch, D.F., MacDonald, S.W., Hunter, M.A., Levy-Bencheton, J., Strauss, E. (2000). Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in the elderly: Comparison of adults with mild dementia, adults with arthritis, and healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 14, 588–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultsch, D.F., Strauss, E., Hunter, M.A., MacDonald, S.W. (2008). Intraindividual variability, cognition, and aging. In F.I.M. Craik & T.A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed., pp. 491–556). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, A.M., Uddin, L.Q., Biswal, B.B., Castellanos, F.X., Milham, M.P. (2008). Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability. Neuroimage, 39, 527–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, J.C., Eggers, C., Kalbe, E., Weisenbach, S., Hohmann, C., Vollmar, S., Hilker, R. (2010). Neurotransmitter changes in dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson disease dementia in vivo. Neurology, 74, 885–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, S., Aggen, S.H., Nesselroade, J.R., Baltes, P.B. (2001). Short-term fluctuations in elderly people's sensorimotor functioning predict text and spatial memory performance: The Macarthur Successful Aging Studies. Gerontology, 47, 100–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, S.-C., Lindenberger, U. (1999). Cross-level unification: A computational exploration of the link between deterioration of neurotransmitter systems and dedifferentiation of cognitive abilities in old age. In L.-G. Nilsson & H. Markowitsch (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience and memory (pp. 103–146). Toronto: Hogrefe & Hber.Google Scholar
Li, S.-C., von Oertzen, T., Lindenberger, U. (2006). A neurocomputational model of stochastic resonance and aging. Neurocomputing, 69, 1553–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lövdén, M., Li, S.-C., Shing, Y.L., Lindenberger, U. (2007). Within-person trial-to-trial variability precedes and predicts cognitive decline in old and very old age: Longitudinal data from the Berlin Aging Study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2827–2838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, S.W., Hultsch, D.F., Dixon, R.A. (2003). Performance variability is related to change in cognition: Evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study. Psychology and Aging, 18, 510–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, S.W., Li, S.-C., Bäckman, L. (2009). Neural underpinnings of within-person variability in cognitive functioning. Psychology and Aging, 24, 792–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, J.C. (1993). The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology, 43, 2412–2414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parmelee, P.A., Thuras, P.D., Katz, I.R., Lawton, M.P. (1995). Validation of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale in a geriatric residential population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 43, 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, W.G., Terry, R.D., Fuld, P.A., Katzman, R., Peck, A. (1980). Pathological verification of ischemic score in differentiation of dementias. Annals of Neurology, 7, 486–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuss, D.T., Pogue, J., Buckle, L., Bondar, J. (1994). Characterization of stability in performance in patients with traumatic brain injury: Variability and consistency on reaction time tests. Neuropsychology, 8, 316–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchy, Y., Kraybill, M., Franchow, E. (2011). Practice effect and beyond: Reaction to novelty as an independent predictor of cognitive decline among older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehead, B.P., Dixon, R.A., Hultsch, D.F., MacDonald, S.W. (2011). Are neurocognitive speed and inconsistency similarly affected in Type 2 diabetes? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 647–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yesavage, J.A. (1988). Geriatric Depression Scale. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 709–711.Google ScholarPubMed