Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:36:12.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presentation modality influences behavioral measures of alerting, orienting, and executive control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2006

KATHERINE L. ROBERTS ,
A. QUENTIN SUMMERFIELD  and
DEBORAH A. HALL
KATHERINE L. ROBERTS
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council, Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom
A. QUENTIN SUMMERFIELD
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom
DEBORAH A. HALL
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council, Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Attention Network Test (ANT) uses visual stimuli to separately assess the attentional skills of alerting (improved performance following a warning cue), spatial orienting (an additional benefit when the warning cue also cues target location), and executive control (impaired performance when a target stimulus contains conflicting information). This study contrasted performance on auditory and visual versions of the ANT to determine whether the measures it obtains are influenced by presentation modality. Forty healthy volunteers completed both auditory and visual tests. Reaction-time measures of executive control were of a similar magnitude and significantly correlated, suggesting that executive control might be a supramodal resource. Measures of alerting were also comparable across tasks. In contrast, spatial-orienting benefits were obtained only in the visual task. Auditory spatial cues did not improve response times to auditory targets presented at the cued location. The different spatial-orienting measures could reflect either separate orienting resources for each perceptual modality, or an interaction between a supramodal orienting resource and modality-specific perceptual processing (JINS, 2006, 12, 485–492.)

Keywords

Auditory perceptionVisual perceptionAttentionCuesAttention Network TestANT
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , July 2006 , pp. 485 - 492
Copyright
© 2006 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Badre, D. & Wagner, A.D. (2004). Selection, integration, and conflict monitoring: Assessing the nature and generality of prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms. Neuron, 41, 473–487.Google Scholar
Bédard, M.A., El Massioui, F., Pillon, B., & Nandrino, J.L. (1993). Time for reorienting of attention: A premotor hypothesis of the underlying mechanism. Neuropsychologia, 31, 241–249.Google Scholar
Blauert, J. & Lindeman, W. (1986). Spatial mapping of intracranial auditory events for various degrees of interaural coherence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, 806–813.Google Scholar
Buchtel, H.A. & Butter, C.M. (1988). Spatial attentional shifts: Implications for the role of polysensory mechanisms. Neuropsychologia, 26, 499–509.Google Scholar
Buchtel, H.A., Butter, C.M., & Ayvasik, B. (1996). Effects of stimulus source and intensity on covert orientation to auditory stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 34, 979–985.Google Scholar
Callejas, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2004). The three attentional networks: On their independence and interactions. Brain and Cognition, 54, 225–227.Google Scholar
Cowan, J., Hind, S., Smith, P., Ferguson, M., Riley, A., Folkard, T., & Moore, D. (2005). Development and standardisation of a test battery for research in auditory processing disorder (APD): The children's auditory processing evaluation (CAPE). Paper presented at the 28th Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, New Orleans, LA.
Cusack, R., Carlyon, R.P., & Robertson, I.H. (2000). Neglect between but not within auditory objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1056–1065.Google Scholar
Eriksen, B.A. & Eriksen, C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.Google Scholar
Fan, J., Flombaum, J.I., McCandliss, B.D., Thomas, K.M., & Posner, M.I. (2003). Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. NeuroImage, 18, 42–57.Google Scholar
Fan, J., McCandliss, B.D., Fossella, J., Flombaum, J.I., & Posner, M.I. (2005). The activation of attentional networks. NeuroImage, 26, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, J., McCandliss, B.D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M.I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Duque, D. & Posner, M.I. (1997). Relating the mechanisms of orienting and alerting. Neuropsychologia, 35, 477–486.Google Scholar
Fossella, J.A., Sommer, T., Fan, J., Wu, Y., Swanson, J.M., Pfaff, D.W., & Posner, M.I. (2002). Assessing the molecular genetics of attention networks. BMC Neuroscience, 3, 1–11.Google Scholar
Gatehouse, S. & Noble, W. (2004). The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). International Journal of Audiology, 43, 85–99.Google Scholar
Green, E.J. & Barber, P.J. (1983). Interference effects in an auditory Stroop task: Congruence and correspondence. Acta Psychologica, 53, 183–194.Google Scholar
Hugdahl, K. & Nordby, H. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates to cued attentional shifts in the visual and auditory modalities. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 62, 21–32.Google Scholar
Jerger, J. & Musiek, F. (2000). Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiologists, 11, 467–474.Google Scholar
Kanwisher, N. & Wojciulik, E. (2000). Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 1, 91–100.Google Scholar
Kastner, S., Pinsk, M.A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L.G. (1999). Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron, 22, 751–761.Google Scholar
Kinomura, S., Larsson, J., Gulyas, B., & Roland, P.E. (1996). Activation by attention of the human reticular formation and thalamic intralaminar nuclei. Science, 271, 512–515.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C.M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.Google Scholar
Makous, J.C. & Middlebrooks, J.C. (1990). Two-dimensional sound localization by human listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 2188–2200.Google Scholar
Marrocco, R.T. & Davidson, M.C. (1998). Neurochemistry of attention. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mayer, A.R., Harrington, D., Adair, J.C., & Lee, R. (2006). The neural networks underlying endogenous auditory covert orienting and reorienting. NeuroImage, 30, 938–949.Google Scholar
McClain, L. (1983). Stimulus-response compatibility affects auditory Stroop interference. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 266–270.Google Scholar
McDonald, J.J. & Ward, L.M. (1999). Spatial relevance determines facilitatory and inhibitory effects of auditory covert spatial orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1234–1252.Google Scholar
Mezzacappa, E. (2004). Alerting, orienting, and executive attention: Developmental properties and sociodemographic correlates in an epidemiological sample of young, urban children. Child Development, 75, 1373–1386.Google Scholar
Mondor, T.A. & Bregman, A.S. (1994). Allocating attention to frequency regions. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 268–276.Google Scholar
Mondor, T.A. & Zatorre, R.J. (1995). Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 387–409.Google Scholar
Nobre, A.C., Gitelman, D.R., Dias, E.C., & Mesulam, M.M. (2000). Covert visual spatial orienting and saccades: Overlapping neural systems. NeuroImage, 11, 210–216.Google Scholar
Pardo, J.V., Fox, P.T., & Raichle, M.E. (1991). Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature, 349, 61–64.Google Scholar
Posner, M.I. (1978). Chronometrics explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M.I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.Google Scholar
Posner, M.I. & Fan, J., (in press). Attention as an organ system. In J. Pomerantz (Ed.), Neurobiology of perception and communication: From synapse to society. The IVth De Lange Conference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Posner, M.I., Rothbart, M.K., Vizueta, N., Levy, K.N., Evans, D.E., Thomas, K.M., & Clarkin, J.F. (2002). Attentional mechanisms of borderline personality disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 99, 16,366–16,370.Google Scholar
Quinlan, P.T. & Bailey, P.J. (1995). An examination of attentional control in the auditory modality: Further evidence for auditory orienting. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 614–628.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. (1987). Auditory attention and the representation of spatial information. Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 1–14.Google Scholar
Robertson, I.H., Ward, T., Ridgeway, V., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1996). Structure of normal human attention: The Test of Everyday Attention. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 525–534.Google Scholar
Rosen, A.C., Rao, S.M., Caffarra, P., Scaglioni, A., Bobholz, J.A., Woodley, S.J., Hammeke, T.A., Cunningham, J.M., Prieto, T.E., & Binder, J.R. (1999). Neural basis of endogenous and exogenous spatial orienting: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 135–152.Google Scholar
Rueda, M.R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B.D., Halparin, J.D., Gruber, D.B., Lercari, L.P., & Posner, M.I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1029–1040.Google Scholar
Sach, A.J., Hill, N.I., & Bailey, P.J. (2000). Auditory spatial attention using interaural time differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 717–729.Google Scholar
Spence, C. & Driver, J. (1994). Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 555–574.Google Scholar
Sturm, W. & Willmes, K. (2001). On the functional neuroanatomy of intrinsic and phasic alertness. NeuroImage, 14, S76–S84.Google Scholar
Sturm, W., Willmes, K., Orgass, B., & Hartje, W. (1997). Do specific attention deficits need specific training? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 7, 81–103.Google Scholar
Summerfield, A.Q. & Akeroyd, M.A. (1998). Computational approaches to modelling auditory selective attention: Monaural and binaural processes. In S. Greenberg & M. Slaney (Eds.), Course reader for the NATO Advanced Study Institute on computational hearing. Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute.
Vallar, G. (1998). Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 87–97.Google Scholar
Wang, K., Fan, J., Dong, Y., Wang, C.-Q., Lee, T.M.C., & Posner, M.I. (2005). Selective impairment of attentional networks of orienting and executive control in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 78, 235–241.Google Scholar