Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:02:12.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of response inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder using the Hayling task

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2005

MARTIAL VAN DER LINDEN
Affiliation:
Cognitive Psychopathology and Neuropsychology Unit, FPSE, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
GRAZIA CESCHI
Affiliation:
Cognitive Psychopathology and Neuropsychology Unit, FPSE, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
ARIANE ZERMATTEN
Affiliation:
Cognitive Psychopathology and Neuropsychology Unit, FPSE, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
DANIELA DUNKER
Affiliation:
Cognitive Psychopathology and Neuropsychology Unit, FPSE, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
ALAIN PERROUD
Affiliation:
Clinique des Vallées, Ville-la-Grand, France

Abstract

This study investigates response inhibition deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) by using the Hayling task. Sixteen OCD washers, 16 OCD checkers, 16 social phobic patients and 16 nonanxious controls were asked to complete sentences with either the expected word (section A: “initiation”) or an unrelated word (section B: “inhibition”). The groups did not differ in terms of section B minus section A latencies. However, OCD washers and checkers made significantly more errors (sentence-related responses) in section B than social phobic patients and controls. In the OCD patients, the frequency of these errors correlates with the total OCD severity score and the compulsion subscore, but not with the depression and anxiety scores. These findings suggest that OCD patients might present a specific deficit affecting the inhibition of a prepotent response. (JINS, 2005, 11, 776–783.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Andrés, P. & Van der Linden, M. (2001). Supervisory attentional system in patients with focal frontal lesions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 225239.Google Scholar
Balota, D.A. & Faust, M. (2001). Attention in dementia of the Alzheimer type. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (2nd ed., Vol. 6, pp. 5180). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bannon, S., Gonsalvez, C.J., Croft, R.J., & Boyce, P.M. (2002). Response inhibition deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research, 110, 165174.Google Scholar
Barrett, L.F., Tugade, M.M., & Engle, R.W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553573.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., & Brown, G.K. (1998). Inventaire de Dépression de Beck (version 2 BDI-II). Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
Bouquet, C.A., Bonnaud, V., & Gil, R. (2003). Investigation of supervisory attentional system functions in patients with Parkinson's disease using the Hayling task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 751760.Google Scholar
Burgess, P.W. & Shallice, T. (1996). Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 34, 263272.Google Scholar
Ceschi, G., Van der Linden, M., Dunker, D., Perroud, A., & Bredart, S. (2003). Further exploration memory bias in compulsive washers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 737747.Google Scholar
Channon, S., Sinclair, E., Waller, D., Healey, L., & Robertson, M.M. (2004). Social cognition in Tourette's syndrome: Intact theory of mind and impaired inhibitory functioning. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 669677.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collette, F., Van der Linden, M., & Salmon, E. (1999). Executive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 35, 5772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottraux, J., Bouvard, M., & Légeron, P. (1996). Méthodes et échelles d'évaluation des comportements. Paris: Masson.
Enright, S.J. & Beech, A.R. (1990). Obsessional states: Anxiety disorders or schizotypes? An information processing and personality assessment. Psychological Medicine, 20, 621627.Google Scholar
Enright, S.J. & Beech, A.R. (1993a). Further evidence of reduced cognitive inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 387395.Google Scholar
Enright, S.J. & Beech, A.R. (1993b). Reduced cognitive inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 6774.Google Scholar
Enright, S.J., Beech, A.R., & Claridge, G.S. (1995). A further investigation of cognitive inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder and other anxiety disorders. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 535542.Google Scholar
Friedman, N.P. & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, W.K., Price, L.H., Rasmussen, S.A., Mazure, C., Fleischmann, R.L., Hill, C.L., et al. (1989). The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 10061011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartston, H.J. & Swerdlow, N.R. (1999). Visuospatial priming and Stroop performance in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. Neuropsychology, 13, 447457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasher, L., Zacks, R.T., & May, C.P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII, Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hoenig, K., Hochrein, A., Müller, D.J., & Wagner, M. (2002). Different negative priming impairments in schizophrenia and subgroups of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychological Medicine, 32, 459468.Google Scholar
Kieley, J.M. & Hartley, A.A. (1997). Age-related equivalence of identity suppression in the Stroop color-word task. Psychology and Aging, 12, 2229.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, M.R. (1987). Social phobia. Mood Problems in Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubman, D.I., Yücel, M., & Pantelis, C. (2004). Addiction, a condition of compulsive behaviour? Neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence of inhibitory dysregulation. Addiction, 99, 14911502.Google Scholar
MacDonald, P.A., Antony, M.M., MacLeod, C.M., & Swinson, R.P. (1999). Negative priming for obsessive-compulsive checkers and noncheckers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 679686.Google Scholar
Marczewski, P., Van der Linden, M., & Larøi, F. (2001). Further investigation of the supervisory attentional system in schizophrenia: Planning, inhibition and rule abstraction. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 6, 175192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNally, R.J., Wilhelm, S., Buhlmann, U., & Shin, L.M. (2001). Cognitive inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Application of a valence-based negative priming paradigm. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 103106.Google Scholar
Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P., & Seiffert, A. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203229.Google Scholar
Mollard, E., Cottraux, J., & Bouvard, M. (1986). Version française de l'Echelle d'Obsession-Compulsion de Yale-Brown. Encéphale, 15, 3541.Google Scholar
Moritz, S., Birkner, C., Kloss, M., Jahn, H., Hand, I., Haasen, C., et al. (2002). Executive functioning in obsessive-compulsive disorder, unipolar depression, and schizophrenia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 477483.Google Scholar
Moritz, S., Jacobsen, D., Kloss, M., Fricke, S., Rufer, M., & Hand, I. (2004). Examination of emotional Stroop interference in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 671682.Google Scholar
Moritz, S., Kloss, M., Katenkamp, B., Birkner, C., & Hand, I. (1999). Neurocognitive functioning in OCD before and after treatment. CNS Spectrums, 4, 2122.Google Scholar
Moritz, S. & von Mühlenen, A. (2005). Inhibition of return in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 19, 117126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakao, T., Nakagawa, A., Yoshiura, T., Nakatani, E., Nabeyama, M., Yoshizato, C., et al. (2005). A functional MRI comparison of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and normal controls during a Chinese character Stroop task. Psychiatry Research, 139, 101114.Google Scholar
Neill, W.T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 12911305.Google Scholar
Nelson, E., Early, T.S., & Haller, J.W. (1993). Visual attention in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research, 49, 183196.Google Scholar
Nigg, J.T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220246.Google Scholar
Noël, X., Sferrazza, R., Van der Linden, M., Paternot, J., Verhas, M., Hanak, C., et al. (2002). Contribution of frontal cerebral blood flow measured by 99mTc-bicisate SPECT and executive function deficits to predicting treatment outcome in alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 37, 347354.Google Scholar
Noël, X., Van der Linden, M., Schmidt, N., Sferrazza, R., Hanak, C., Le Bon, O., et al. (2001). Supervisory attentional system in nonamnesic alcoholic men. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 11521158.Google Scholar
Norman, D.A. & Shallice, T. (1980). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. Center for human information processing (technical report no. 99). Reprinted in revised form in R.J. Davidson, G.E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation. Advances in research (1986). New York: Plenum.
Rabbitt, P. (1997). Introduction: Methodologies and models in the study of executive function. In P. Rabbitt (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 138). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Rankins, D., Bradshaw, J., Moss, S., & Georgiou-Karistanis, N. (2004). Inhibition of return in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 5459.Google Scholar
Rosnow, R. & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 221237.Google Scholar
Savage, C.R., Deckersbach, T., Wilhelm, S., Rauch, S.L., Baer, L., Reid, T., et al. (2000). Strategic processing and episodic memory impairment in obsessive compulsive disorder. Neuropsychology, 14, 141151.Google Scholar
Shin, M.S., Park, S.J., Kim, M.S., Lee, Y.H., Ha, T.H., & Kwon, J.S. (2004). Deficits of organizational strategy and visual memory in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuropsychology, 18, 665672.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R., & Lushene, R. (1983). The State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) test manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Stoltzfus, E.R., Hasher, L., Zacks, R.T., Ulivi, M.S., & Goldstein, D. (1993). Investigations of inhibition and interference in younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, P179188.Google Scholar
Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 643662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallis, F. (1995). Obsessive-compulsive disorder. A cognitive and neuropsychological perspective. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Tipper, S.P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 571590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, F.A.V., Badcock, J.C., Maybery, M.T., & Michie, P.T. (2003). Inhibition in schizophrenia: Association with auditory hallucinations. Schizophrenia Research, 62, 275280.Google Scholar