Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:02:59.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The phonetics and phonology of lexical prosody in San Jerónimo Acazulco Otomi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2016

Rory Turnbull*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State Universityturnbull@ling.osu.edu

Abstract

San Jerónimo Acazulco Otomi (SJAO) is an underdescribed and endangered Oto-Manguean language spoken in central Mexico. This paper provides an analysis of the phonology of tonal contrasts in SJAO and the phonetics of their realization based on pitch pattern data derived from audio recordings of citation forms of SJAO words. Each SJAO lexical word has one and only one tonal sequence – either /H/ or /HL/. This sequence is underlyingly associated with one syllable in the word. Other syllables are not specified for tone, and their phonetic realization is predictable depending on their position relative to the tonal syllable. A phonetic analysis revealed that underlyingly-tonal syllables are phonetically distinct from non-tonal syllables: those with /H/ are produced with greater vocal effort (measured by spectral tilt), and those with /HL/ are longer, louder, and bear a higher f0 (fundamental frequency), compared with non-tonal syllables. This analysis differs from previous accounts of lexical prosody in other Otomi varieties, which have either described a three-way system of high, low, and rising tones contrasting on every stem syllable, or a system where one syllable per word is assigned a stress-like ‘accent’. This difference from previous analyses suggests that there is a third possible characterization of lexical prosody for Otomi, which is appropriate for SJAO and potentially other understudied varieties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, Henrietta. 1949. Phonemes and morphophonemes of Temoayan Otomi. International Journal of American Linguistics 15 (4), 213222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Henrietta. 1993. The function of verb prefixes in Southwestern Otomí. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Arellanes, Francisco, Carranza, Leonardo, Chávez-Peón, Mario E, Fidencio, Verónica, Guerrero, Alonso, Ring, Michael Knapp & Romero, Antonio. 2011. Hacia una tipología tonal de las lenguas otopames. Memorias Del V Congreso de Idiomas Indígenas de Latinoamérica. Austin, TX: Archive of the Indigenous Languages of Latin America.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, Doris. 1965. The reconstruction of Otopamean (Mexico). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, Doris. 1979. Review of Otomi parables, folktales, and jokes, edited by H. Russell Bernard & Jesús Salinas Pedraza. The International Journal of American Linguistics 45 (1), 9497.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, Doris. 2000. Intercambio lingüístico entre otomí y náhuatl. Estudios de Cultura Otopame 2, 189201.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. 1986. Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bent, Tessa. 2004. Mandarin and English listeners’ perception of Mandarin tones in isolation and in context. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (4), 2573.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell. 1966. Otomi tones. Anthropological Linguistics 8 (9), 1519.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell. 1973. Otomí phonology and orthography. International Journal of American Linguistics 39 (3), 180184.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell. 1974. Otomi tones in discourse. International Journal of American Linguistics 40 (2), 141150.Google Scholar
Bernard, H Russell. 1980. Orthography for whom? International Journal of American Linguistics 46 (2), 133136.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell & Pedraza, Jesús Salinas 1976. Otomi parables, folktales, and jokes (IJAL Native American Texts Series 2). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berthiaume, Scott Charles. 2004. A phonological grammar of Northern Pame. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Blicher, Deborah L., Diehl, Randy L. & Cohen, Leslie B.. 1990. Effects of syllable duration on the perception of the Mandarin tone 2/tone 3 distinction: Evidence of auditory enhancement. Journal of Phonetics 18 (1), 3749.Google Scholar
Blight, Richard C. & Pike, Eunice V.. 1976. The phonology of Tenango Otomi. International Journal of American Linguistics 42 (1), 5157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeg Thomsen, Ditte & Hansen, Magnus Pharao. 2015. Lenguaje del paisaje: Testimonios lingüísticos del otomí de acazulco. In Vigliani, Silvina & Junco, Roverto (eds.), Bajo el volcán: Vida y ritualidad en torno al nevado de Toluca, 2547. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1993. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences 17, 97110.Google Scholar
Cole, Jennifer, Hualde, José Ignacio & Iskarous, Khalil. 1999. Effects of prosodic and segmental context on /g/-lenition in Spanish. In Fujimura, Osamu, Joseph, Brian D. & Palek, Bohumil (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Linguistics and Phonetics Conference, 575589. Prague: The Karolinium Press.Google Scholar
Crowhurst, Megan J. & Olivares, Amador Teodocio. 2014. Beyond the iambic-trochaic law: The joint influence of duration and intensity on the perception of rhythmic speech. Phonology 31 (1), 5194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, Luis Hernández, Torquemada, Moisés Victoria & Crawford, Donaldo Sinclair (eds.). 2004. Diccionario del hñähñu (otomí): Valle del Mesquital, Hidalgo (Vocabularios Indígenas 45). Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
de Jong, Kenneth J. 1995. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (1), 491504.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1966. A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 4 (1–4), 183198.Google Scholar
Dilley, Laura C. 2005. The phonetics and phonology of tonal systems. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Donohue, M. 2005. Tone and the Trans New Guinea languages. In Kaji, Shigeki (ed.), Cross-linguistic studies of tonal phenomena: Historical development and the tone/syntax interface, 3353. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies Research Institute for Language and Cultures of Asia and Africa. Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. 1994. Varieties of variation in a very small place: Social homogeneity, prestige norms, and linguistic variation. Language 70 (4), 631696.Google Scholar
Engstrand, Olle. 1988. Articulatory correlates of stress and speaking rate in Swedish VCV utterances. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83 (5), 18631875.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar, Kruckenberg, Anita & Nord, Lennart. 1991. Durational correlates of stress in Swedish, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics 19 (3–4), 351365.Google Scholar
Figueroa, Sandra. 2012. El pasado otomí de la sierra de las Cruces: Su representación en voces de San Jerónimo Acazulco, Estado de México. Master's thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Figueroa, Sandra. 2015. De luna a luna: Quehaceres de las tías para una boda otomí. Estudios de Cultura Otopame 8 (1), 257274.Google Scholar
Fry, Dennis B. 1955. Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27, 765768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandour, Jackson T. 1978. The perception of tone. In Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey, 4172. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Gómez Rendón, Jorge. 2008. Typological and social constraints on language contact: Amerindian languages in contact with Spanish. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2011. Stress: Phonotactic and phonetic evidence. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. II: Suprasegmental and prosodic phonology, 924948. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29, 383406.Google Scholar
Hanson, Helen M. 1997. Glottal characteristics of female speakers: Acoustic correlates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101 (1), 466481.Google Scholar
Harvey, Herbert R. 1972. The Relaciones Geográficas, 1579–1586: Native languages. In Cline, Howard F. (ed.), Handbook of Middle American Indians, vol. 12, 279323. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hawks, John W. & Miller, James D.. 1995. A formant bandwidth estimation procedure for vowel synthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (2), 13431345.Google Scholar
Hekking, Ewald. 1995. El otomí de Santiago Mexquititlán: Desplazamiento lingüístico, préstamos y cambios grammaticales. Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language; Language Use.Google Scholar
Hekking, Ewald & de Jesús, Severiano Andrés. 1984. Gramática otomí. Querétaro: Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro.Google Scholar
Hekking, Ewald & Bakker, Dik. 2009. Loanwords in Otomi, an Otomanguean language of Mexico. In Haspelmath, Martin & Tadmor, Uri (eds), Loanwords in the world's languages: A comparative Handbook, 897915. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heldner, Mattias. 2003. On the reliability of overall intensity and spectral emphasis as acoustic correlates of focal accents in Swedish. Journal of Phonetics 31, 3962.Google Scholar
Henrich, Nathalie, d'Allesandro, Christophe & Doval, Boris. 2001. Spectral correlates of voice open quotient and glottal flow asymmetry: Theory, limits, and experimental data. In Dalsgaard, Paul, Lindberg, Børge & Benner, Henrik (eds.), Proceedings of Eurospeech, 4750. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Hernández-Green, Néstor. 2011. Surgimiento de formas no finitas (FNF) en otomí de Acazulco. Memorias Del V Congreso de Idiomas Indígenas de Latinoamérica. Austin, TX: Archive of the Indigenous Languages of Latin America.Google Scholar
Hernández-Green, Néstor. 2012. Tono y flexión verbal en otomí de Acazulco. Handout from talk given at XII Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste.Google Scholar
Hernández-Green, Néstor. 2015. Morfosintaxis verbal del otomí de Acazulco. Ph.D. dissertation, Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
Hernández-Green, Néstor, Palancar, Enrique L. & Hernández-Gómez, Selene. 2011. The Spanish loanword lado in Otomi spatial descriptions. Language Sciences 33 (6), 961980.Google Scholar
Hess, Harold Harwood. 1962. The syntactic structures of Mezquital Otomi. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Homma, Yayoi. 1981. Durational relationships between Japanese stops and vowels. Journal of Phonetics 9 (3), 273281.Google Scholar
House, Arthur S & Stevens, Kenneth N. 1958. Estimation of formant band widths from measurements of transient response of the vocal tract. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1 (4), 309315.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2006. Remarks on word-prosodic typology. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 32 (BLS 32), 157174.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio, Elordieta, Gorka, Gaminde, Iñaki & Smiljanić, Rajka. 2002. From pitch accent to stress accent in Basque. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.), Laboratory Phonology VII, 547584. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huffman, Marie K. 1987. Measures of phonation type in Hmong. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 81 (2), 495504.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2006. Word-prosodic typology. Phonology 23, 225257.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31, 213238.Google Scholar
Iseli, Markus, Shue, Yen-Liang & Alwan, Abeer. 2007. Age, sex, and vowel dependencies of acoustic measures related to the voice source. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121 (4), 22832295.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Studies on child language and aphasia. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Allan R. 1977. Chiquihuitlan Mazatec tone. In Merrifield, William R (ed.), Studies in Otomanguean phonology, 108136. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics & The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Jiménez Moreno, Wigberto. 1936. Mapa lingüístico del norte y centroamérica. Mexico City: Instituto Panamericano de Geograféa e Historia.Google Scholar
Kager, René. 1993. Alternatives to the iambic-trochaic law. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 11, 381432.Google Scholar
Kaji, Shigeki (ed.). 1999. Cross-linguistic studies of tonal phenomena: Tonogenesis, typology, and related topics. Tokyo: ILCAA.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. & Esposito, Christina. 2007. Linguistic voice quality. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 105, 8591.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. & Klatt, Laura C.. 1990. Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87 (2), 820857.Google Scholar
Kreiman, Jody, Gerratt, Bruce R & Antoñanzas-Barroso, Norma. 2007. Measures of the glottal source spectrum. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 595610.Google Scholar
Kreiman, Jody, Shue, Yen-Liang, Chen, Gang, Iseli, Markus, Gerratt, Bruce R., Neubauer, Juergen & Alwan, Abeer. 2012. Variability in the relationships among voice quality, harmonic amplitudes, open quotient, and glottal area waveform shape in sustained phonation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132 (4), 26252632.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo. 2011. Japanese pitch accent. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. V: Phonology across languages, 28792907. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1984. Declination: A review and some hypotheses. Phonology Yearbook 1, 5374.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 2014. Simultaneous structure in phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter, Maddieson, Ian & Jackson, Michel. 1988. Investigating phonation types in different languages. In Fujimura, Osamu (ed.), Vocal fold physiology: Voice production, mechanisms and functions, 297317. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Lastra, Yolanda. 1989. Otomí de San Andrés Cuexcontitlán, Estado de México. Mexico City: Archivo de Lenguas Indígenas de México.Google Scholar
Lastra, Yolanda. 1996. Verbal morphology of Ixtenco Otomi. Amerindia 21, 18.Google Scholar
Lastra, Yolanda. 1997. El otomí de Ixtenco. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM.Google Scholar
Lastra, Yolanda. 1998. Otomí loans and creations. In Hill, Jane H., Mistry, P. J. & Campbell, Lyle (eds.), The life of language: Papers in linguistics in honor of William Bright, 5966. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lastra, Yolanda. 2001. Unidad y diversidad de la lengua. Relatos otomíes. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM.Google Scholar
Lastra, Yolanda. 2006. Los otomies – su lengua y su historia. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM.Google Scholar
Lastra, Yolanda. 2010. Diversidad lingüística: Variación dialectal actual. In Barriga, Rebecca & Butragueño, Pedro Martín (eds.), Historia sociolingüística de México, vol. 2, 841880. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. 2011. Autosegments. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. I: General issues and segmental phonology, 311339. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leon, Frances. 1963. Revisión de la folonología del otomí. Anales Del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia 15, 315330.Google Scholar
Leon, Frances & Swadesh, Morris. 1949. Two views of Otomi prosody. International Journal of American Linguistics 15 (2), 100105.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2004. Headed spans and autosegmental spreading. Ms., University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Mock, Carol C. 1983. Tone sandhi in Isthmus Zapotec: An autosegmental account. Linguistic Analysis 12 (1), 91139.Google Scholar
Nakai, Satsuki, Kunnari, Sari, Turk, Alice, Suomi, Kari & Ylitalo, Riika. 2009. Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in northern Finnish. Journal of Phonetics 37, 2945.Google Scholar
Odden, David. 1999. Typological issues in tone and stress in Bantu. In Kaji (ed.), 187–215.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2004a. Middle voice in Otomi. International Journal of American Linguistics 70 (1), 5285.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2004b. Verbal morphology and prosody in Otomi. International Journal of American Linguistics 70 (3), 251278.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2006. Property concepts in Otomí: A language with no adjectives. International Journal of American Linguistics 72 (3), 325366.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2009. Gramática y textos del hñöñhö: Otomí de San Ildefonso Tultepec, Querétaro, vol. 1: Gramática. Mexico City: Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2011. The conjugations of colonial Otomi. Transactions of the Philological Society 109 (3), 246264.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2012. The conjugation classes of Tilapa Otomi: An approach from canonical typology. Linguistics 50 (4), 783832.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2013a. The evolution of number in Otomi: The many faces of the dual. Studies in Language 37 (1), 94143.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2013b. Nominalización y complementación en otomí. In Palancar, Enrique L. & Maldonaldo, Roberto Zavala (eds.), Clases léxicas, posesión y cláusulas complejas en lenguas de Mesoamérica, 381412. Mexico City: CIESAS.Google Scholar
Pharao Hansen, Magnus. 2012. Kinship in the past tense: Language, care and cultural memory in a Mexican community. Master's thesis, Brown University.Google Scholar
Pharao Hansen, Magnus, Hernández-Green, Néstor, Turnbull, Rory & Thomsen, Ditte Boeg, 2016. Life histories, language attitudes and linguistic variation: navigating the micropolitics of language revitalization in an Otomí community in Mexico. In Báez, Gabriela Pérez, Rogers, Chris & Labrada, Jorge Emilio Rosés (eds.), Language documentation and revitalization in Latin American contexts, 215246. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pharao Hansen, Magnus, Turnbull, Rory & Thomsen, Ditte Boeg. 2011. From academic salvage linguistics to community-based documentation in only three weeks: Report from a collective and interdisciplinary fieldwork on Acazulco Otomí. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo, Kunter, Gero & Schramm, Mareile. 2011. Acoustic correlates of primary and secondary stress in north American English. Journal of Phonetics 39, 362374.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Doug. 1986. Tone in lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Shaeffler, Felix. 2005. Phonological quantity in Swedish dialects. Reports in Phonetics Umeå University (PHONUM), vol. 10.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel. 1997. Tone sandhi in Comaltepec Chinantec. Language 73 (3), 473492.Google Scholar
Simpson, Adrian P. 2012. The first and second harmonics should not be used to measure breathiness in male and female voices. Journal of Phonetics 40 (3), 477490.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Donald E. & Pike, Kenneth L.. 1948. The tonemes of Mesquital Otomi. International Journal of American Linguistics 14 (2), 9198.Google Scholar
Sluijter, Agaath M. C. & van Heuven, Vincent J.. 1996. Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100 (4), 24712485.Google Scholar
Suárez, Jorge A. 1983. The Mesoamerican Indian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turk, Alice E. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2007. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 35, 445472.Google Scholar
Uwano, Zendo. 1999. Classification of Japanese accent systems. In Kaji (ed.), 151–186.Google Scholar
Canales, Valle, Leticia, Berna. 2008. Obsolescencia dialectal y evolución de la lengua: la variación fonológica del otomí de San Pedro Atlapulco. Master's thesis, Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry. 2011. Pitch accent systems. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. II: Suprasegmental and prosodic phonology, 10031025. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry & Smith, Norval. 1988. Introduction. In van der Hulst, Harry & Smith, Norval (eds.), Autosegmental studies on pitch accent systems, ixxxiv. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Voigtlander, Katherine & Echegoyen, Artemisa. 1985. Luces contemporaneas del otomí: gramática del otomí de la sierra. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Volhardt, Marc Daniel Skibsted. 2014. Determination of a phoneme set for Acazulco Otomí: Linguistic fieldwork in Ndöngü, San Jerónimo Acazulco. Master's thesis, University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Wallis, Ethel E. 1968. The word and the phonological hierarchy of Mezquital Otomi. Language 44 (1), 7690.Google Scholar
Wayland, Ratree & Jongman, Allard. 2003. Acoustic correlates of breathy and clear vowels: The case of Khmer. Journal of Phonetics 31, 181201.Google Scholar
Whalen, Doug H. & Xu, Yi. 1992. Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments. Phonetica 49 (1), 2547.Google Scholar
Wright Carr, David Charles. 2005. Precisiones sobre el término ‘otomí’. Arqueología Mexicana 13 (73), 19.Google Scholar
Wright Carr, David Charles. 2008. La sociedad prehispánica en las lenguas náhuatl y otomí. Acta Universitaria 18 (1), 1523.Google Scholar
Wright Carr, David Charles. 2010. Préstamos lingüísticos entre el otomí y el náhuatl. In Salazar, Ana María & Kugel, Verónica (eds.), Homenaje a Yolanda Lastra. X coloquio internacional sobre otopames, 211220. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard. 2004. Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In Local, John, Ogden, Richard & Temple, Rosalind (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV: Phonetic interpretation, 7585. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1989. Contour tones. Phonology 6 (1), 149174.Google Scholar