Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:59:19.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Total eclipse of the heart? The production of eclipsis in two speaking styles of Irish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2016

Pauline Welby
Affiliation:
Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPL, Aix-en-Provence, France & University College Dublinpauline.welby@lpl-aix.fr
Máire Ní Chiosáin
Affiliation:
University College Dublinmaire.nichiosain@ucd.ie
Brian Ó Raghallaigh
Affiliation:
Dublin City Universitybrian.oraghallaigh@dcu.ie

Abstract

We examined the production of the Irish initial mutation eclipsis in two speaking styles. In initial mutation phenomena, a word appears with a different initial sound depending on the lexical or morphosyntactic environment (e.g. croí [kɾɣi] ‘(a) heart’ (radical form), (a) chroí [xɾɣi] ‘(his) heart/darling’ (séimhiú-lenition form), and (a) gcroí [ɡɾɣi] ‘their heart/darling’ (eclipsis form)). The goals of the study were:

  1. (i) to examine whether there are acoustic differences between the initial consonants of radical word forms (e.g. [ɡ] of gruig ‘(a) frown/scowl’) and the corresponding consonants of eclipsis forms (e.g. [ɡ] of gcroí), as has been found for similar phenomena in other languages;

  2. (ii) to examine variability in the patterns of initial mutation in the speech of present-day speakers of Irish.

Our analyses offer limited evidence that there may be phonetic differences between radical and corresponding eclipsis consonants, but the current data do not allow us to rule out alternative explanations. The realization of initial mutations in semi-spontaneous speech differed dramatically both from that of read speech and from the expectations of the traditional grammar. The results suggest that the realization of eclipsis and other initial mutations may be style- or register-dependent. We also found some evidence that it may vary by consonant type, in part due to phonological frequency patterns of the language.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Anne H., Bader, Miles, Bard, Ellen Gurman, Boyle, Elizabeth, Doherty, Gwyneth, Garrod, Simon, Isard, Stephen, Kowtko, Jacqueline, McAllister, Jan, Miller, Jim, Sotillo, Catherine, Thompson, Henry S. & Weinert, Regina. 1991. The HCRC map task corpus. Language and Speech 34, 351366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, Martin J. & Müller, Nicole. 1992. Mutation in Welsh. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barr, Dale L., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph & Tily, Harry J.. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68, 255278.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin & Bolker, Ben. 2013. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan, McGuire, Grant, Chiosáin, Máire Ní & Padgett, Jaye. 2014. An ultrasound study of Connemara Irish palatalization and velarization. Ms., University of California Santa Cruz, University College Dublin & Yale University.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2011. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [software]. http://www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Borgstrøm, Carl. 1940. A linguistic survey of the Gaelic dialects of Scotland: The dialects of the Outer Hebrides. Oslo: Oslo University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charles-Luce, Jan. 1985. Word-final devoicing in German: Effects of phonetic and sentential contexts. Journal of Phonetics 13, 309324.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong & Ladefoged, Peter 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27, 207229.Google Scholar
de Bhaldraithe, Tomás. 1953. Gaeilge Chois Fhairrge: An deilbhíocht [The Irish of Cois Fhairrge: Morphology]. Baile Átha Cliath: Institiúid Árd-Léinn Bhaile Átha Cliath.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Marianna & Yaeger-Dror, Malcah. 2011. Sociophonetics: A student's guide. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dillon, Myles. 1973. Vestiges of the Irish dialect of East Mayo. Celtica 10, 1521.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A. & Garcia-Zamor, M.. 1971. The three degrees of vowel duration in German. Papers in Linguistics 4, 111126.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. 1973. Grammatical change in a dying dialect. Language 49, 413438.Google Scholar
Ewen, Colin. 1982. The phonological representation of the Welsh mutations. In Anderson, John A. (ed.), Language form and function: Papers dedicated to Angus McIntosh, 7595. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Falc'hun, F. 1951. Le système consonantique du breton avec une étude comparative de phonétique expérimentale. Annales de Bretagne 57, 5194.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile. 2007. Word boundaries and contrast neutralization in the case of enchaînement in French. In Cole, Jennifer & Hualde, José I. (eds.), Laboratory Phonology IX, 609642. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile, Bagou, Odile, Content, Alain, Stefanuto, Muriel & Frauenfelder, Ulrich. 2003. Looking for acoustic cues of resyllabification in French. 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XV), Barcelona, 2257–2260.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile & Keating, Patricia A.. 1997. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 37283740.Google Scholar
Fourakis, Marios & Iverson, Gregory K.. 1984. On the ‘Incomplete Neutralization’ of German final obstruents. Phonetica 41, 140149.Google Scholar
Frenda, Alessio S. 2012. Gender in Irish between continuity and change. Folia Linguistica 45, 283316.Google Scholar
Gaskell, M. Gareth, Spinelli, Elsa & Meunier, Fanny. 2002. Perception of resyllabification in French. Memory and Cognition 30, 798810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, Antony D. 2003. The independence of phonology and morphology: The Celtic mutations. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 32, 4787.Google Scholar
Green, Antony D. 2006. The independence of phonology and morphology: The Celtic mutations. Lingua 116, 19461985.Google Scholar
Green, Antony D. 2007. Phonology Limited: Linguistics in Potsdam 27. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Grijzenhout, Janet. 1995. Irish consonant mutation and phonological theory. Utrecht: Onderzoeksinstituut voor Taal on Spraak OTS.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J. (eds.), The view from Building 20: Linguistic essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric. 1951. Morphophonemes of the Keltic mutations. Language 27, 230247.Google Scholar
Hannahs, S. J. 2011. Celtic mutations. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth V. & Rice, Keren (eds.), Blackwell companion to phonology, 28072830. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hannahs, S. J. 2013. Celtic initial mutation: Pattern extraction and subcategorisation. Word Structure 61, 120.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. 2008. Lenition, weakening and consonantal strength: Tracing concepts through the history of phonology. In de Carvalho, Joaquim Brandão, Scheer, Tobias & Ségéral, Philippe (eds.), Lenition and fortition, 992. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Iosad, Pavel. 2008. All that glistens is not gold: Against autosegmental approaches to initial consonant mutations. Presented at Generative Linguistics in the Old World (GLOW) 31, Newcastle upon Tyne, 29 April 2008.Google Scholar
Iosad, Pavel. 2010. Right at the left edge: Initial consonant mutations in the world's languages. In Wohlgemuth, Jan & Cysouw, Michael (eds.), Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 45), 105138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iosad, Pavel. 2014. The phonology and morphosyntax of Breton mutation. Lingue e linguaggio 131, 2342.Google Scholar
Ito, Kiwako & Speer, Shari R.. 2006. Using interactive tasks to elicit natural dialogue. In Sudhoff, Stefan, Lenertova, Denisa, Meyer, Roland, Pappert, Sandra, Augurzky, Petra, Mleinek, Ina, Richter, Nicole & Schließer, Johannes (eds.), Methods in empirical prosody research, 229257. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kong, Eun Jong, Beckman, Mary E. & Edwards, Jan. 2012. Voice onset time is necessary but not always sufficient to describe acquisition of voiced stops: The cases of Greek and Japanese. Journal of Phonetics 40, 725744.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1983. New developments in autosegmental morphology: Consonant mutation. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 2, 165175.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh & Abramson, Arthur S.. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20, 384422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Congáil, Nollaig. 2004. Irish grammar book. Indreabhán: Cló Iar Chonnachta.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1997. Phonetic universals. In Hardcastle, William J. & Laver, John (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 619639. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1952. Celtic lenition and Western Romance consonants. Language 28, 192217.Google Scholar
McCone, Kim. 1994. An tSean-Ghaeilge agus a réamhstair [Old Irish and its prehistory]. In McCone, Kim, McManus, Damian, Háinle, Cathal Ó, Williams, Nicholas & Breatnach, Liam (eds.), Stair na Gaeilge [The history of Irish], 61219. Maigh Nuad: Roinn na Sean-Ghaeilge, Coláiste Phádraig.Google Scholar
McCone, Kim. 1996. Towards a relative chronology of ancient and mediaeval Celtic sound change. Maynooth: An Sagart.Google Scholar
McGahan, Conor. 2009. Language obsolescence and language death in south-east Ulster. Ph.D. dissertation, Queens University Belfast.Google Scholar
Mhac an Fhailigh, Éamonn. 1968. The Irish of Erris, Co. Mayo: A phonemic study. Baile Átha Cliath: Institiúid Árd-Léinn Bhaile Átha Cliath.Google Scholar
Mittendorf, Ingo & Sadler, Louisa. 2006. A treatment of Welsh initial mutation. In Butt, Miriam & King, Tracy Holloway (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference, Constance, 343364. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Noël, Wauquier, Sophie, Lancia, Leonardo & Tuller, Betty. 2007. Detection of liaison consonants in speech processing in French. In Prieto, Pilar, Mascaró, Joan & Solé, Maria-Josep (eds.), Segmental and prosodic issues in Romance phonology, 323. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ní Chasaide, Ailbhe. 1999. Irish. In IPA (ed.), Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 111116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ní Chiosáin, Máire. 1991. Topics in the phonology of Irish. Ph.D dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Ó Baoill, Dónall P. 1986. An Foclóir póca [The pocket dictionary]. Baile Átha Cliath: An Gúm.Google Scholar
Ó Broin, Brian. 2014. New Urban Irish: Pidgin, creole, or bona fide dialect? The phonetics and morphology of city and Gaeltacht speakers systematically compared. Journal of Celtic Linguistics 15, 6991.Google Scholar
Ó Curnáin, Brian. 2007. The Irish of Iorras Aithneach, County Galway. Baile Átha Cliath: Institiúid Árd-Léinn Bhaile Átha Cliath.Google Scholar
Ó Giollagáin, Conchúr, Donnacha, Seosamh Mac, Chualáin, Fiona Ní, Shéaghdha, Aoife Ní & O'Brien, Mary. 2007. Comprehensive linguistic study of the use of Irish in the Gaeltacht: Principal findings and recommendations. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ó Maolalaigh, Roibeard. 1995/1996. The development of eclipsis in Gaelic. Scottish Language 14–15, 158173.Google Scholar
Ó Raghallaigh, Brian. 2010. Multi-dialect phonetisation for Irish text-to-speech synthesis: A modular approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
Ó Raghallaigh, Brian. 2014. Fuaimeanna na Gaeilge [The sounds of Irish], 2nd edn. Baile Átha Cliath: Cois Life.Google Scholar
Ó Raghallaigh, Brian, Chiosáin, Máire Ní & Welby, Pauline. 2014. GaelChaint: A corpus of conversational spoken Irish. http://www.gaelchaint.ie.Google Scholar
Ó Sé, Diarmuid. 2000. Gaeilge Chorca Dhuibhne [The Irish of Corca Dhuibhne]. Baile Átha Cliath: Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann.Google Scholar
Ó Siadhail, Mícheál. 1989. Modern Irish: Grammatical structure and dialectal variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oftedal, Magne. 1956. The Gaelic of Leurbost Isle of Lewis: Linguistic survey of the Gaelic dialects of Scotland, vol. 3. Oslo: Norwegian Universities Press.Google Scholar
Oftedal, Magne. 1962. A morphemic evaluation of the Celtic initial mutations. Lochlann 2, 93102.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E. & Lehiste, Ilse. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32, 693703.Google Scholar
Port, Robert & Crawford, Penny.1989. Incomplete neutralization and pragmatics in German. Journal of Phonetics 17, 257282.Google Scholar
Pyatt, Elizabeth J. 1997. An integrated model of the syntax and phonology of Celtic mutation. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer software manual]. Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/ (Version 3.0.0).Google Scholar
Repp, Bruno H. 1984. Closure duration and release burst amplitude cues to stop consonant manner and place of articulation. Language and Speech 27, 245254.Google Scholar
Roettger, T. B. [Timo Röttger], Winter, B., Grawunder, S., Kirby, J. & Grice, M.. 2014. Assessing incomplete neutralization of final devoicing in German. Journal of Phonetics 43, 1125.Google Scholar
Rogers, Henry. 1972. The initial mutations in Modern Scots Gaelic. Studia Celtica 7, 6385.Google Scholar
Schafer, Amy, Speer, Shari, Warren, Paul & White, S. David. 2000. Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29, 169182.Google Scholar
Sils, I. H. & Cohen, A. 1969. On the complex regulating the voiced–voiceless distinction. Language and Speech 12, 80102.Google Scholar
Spinelli, Elsa, McQueen, James M. & Cutler, Anne. 2003. Processing resyllabified words in French. Journal Memory and Language 48, 233254.Google Scholar
Spinelli, Elsa, Welby, Pauline & Schaegis, Anne-Laure. 2007. Fine-grained access to targets and competitors in phonemically identical spoken sequences: The case of French elision. Language and Cognitive Processes 22, 828859.Google Scholar
Stenson, Nancy. 1990. Patterns of mutation in Irish loanwords. Éigse 24, 925.Google Scholar
Stewart, Thomas. 2004. Mutation as morphology: Bases, stems, and shapes in Scottish Gaelic. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Stockman, Gearóid. 1988. Linguistic trends in the terminal stage of Q-Celtic dialects. In MacLennan, Gordon W. (ed.), Proceedings of the First North American Congress of Celtic Studies 1986, Ottawa, 387396.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, Carol, Williams, Karen & Buder, Eugene. 1994. Cross-language differences in phonological acquisition: Swedish and American /t/. Phonetica 51, 146158.Google Scholar
Swingle, Kari. 1993. The Irish and other mutations. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 11, 451466.Google Scholar
Thomas, Enlli Môn & Gathercole, Virginia C. Mueller. 2007. Children's productive command of grammatical gender and mutation in Welsh: An alternative to rule-based learning. First Language 27, 251278.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1946. A grammar of Old Irish. Baile Átha Cliath: Institiúid Árd-Léinn Bhaile Átha Cliath.Google Scholar
The Translation Section of the Houses of the Oireachtas. 1958 [revised 2012]. Gramadach na Gaeilge agus litriú na Gaeilge: an caighdeán oifigiúil [The grammar of Irish and the orthography of Irish: The official standard]. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Turk, Alice & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2007. Phrase-final lengthening in American English. Journal of Phonetics 35, 445472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhonnchadha, , Elaine, Alessio Frenda & Vaughan, Brian. 2012. Issues in designing a corpus of spoken Irish. Presented at 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Istanbul, 23–25 May.Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha, Good, Erin, Jongman, Allard & Sereno, Joan. 2006. Orthographic vs. morphological incomplete neutralization effects. Journal of Phonetics 34, 285293. [Letter to the editor]Google Scholar
Welby, Pauline, Chiosáin, Máire Ní & Raghallaigh, Brian Ó. 2011. A phonetic investigation of Irish eclipsis: Preliminary results and challenges. 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), Hong Kong, 4 pages.Google Scholar
Welby, Pauline, Chiosáin, Máire Ní & Raghallaigh, Brian Ó. 2014. La production des consonnes éclipsées chez de jeunes locuteurs de l'irlandais. In Soum-Favaro, Christine, Coquillon, Annelise & Chevrot, Jean-Pierre (eds.), La liaison: approches contemporaines, 345380. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo & Röttger, Timo [Roettger, T. B.]. 2011. The nature of incomplete neutralization in German. Grazer Linguistische Studien 76, 5576.Google Scholar
Wolf, Matthew. 2007. For an autosegmental theory of mutation. In Bateman, Leah, O'Keefe, Michael, Reilly, Ehren & Werle, Adam (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory III (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 32), 315404. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar