Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:16:40.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WEAK CAYLEY TABLES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2000

KENNETH W. JOHNSON
Affiliation:
Abington College, Pennsylvania State University, 1600 Woodland Road, Abington, PA 19001, USA; kwj1@psu.edu
SANDRO MATTAREI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, via Belzoni 7, Università di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy; mattarei@math.unipd.it Current address: Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Trento, I-38050 POVO (Trento), Italy; mattarei@science.unitn.it
SURINDER K. SEHGAL
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Ohio State University, 231 W 18th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA; sehgal@math.ohio-state.edu
Get access

Abstract

In [1] Brauer puts forward a series of questions on group representation theory in order to point out areas which were not well understood. One of these, which we denote by (B1), is the following: what information in addition to the character table determines a (finite) group? In previous papers [5, 7–13], the original work of Frobenius on group characters has been re-examined and has shed light on some of Brauer's questions, in particular an answer to (B1) has been given as follows.

Frobenius defined for each character χ of a group G functions χ(k)[ratio ]G(k) → [Copf ] for k = 1, …, degχ with χ(1) = χ. These functions are called the k-characters (see [10] or [11] for their definition). The 1-, 2- and 3-characters of the irreducible representations determine a group [7, 8] but the 1- and 2-characters do not [12]. Summaries of this work are given in [11] and [13].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
The London Mathematical Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)