Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:19:28.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Biomass of the Bottom Fauna in the English Channel off Plymouth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

N. A. Holme
N. A. Holme
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A survey has been made of the biomass of the macrobenthos at twenty stations in the English Channel off Plymouth. The object was to provide a basis for following long-term fluctuations in the fauna.

A brief survey of physical conditions in the area is given, and a gradeanalysis of the soil at each station has been made.

Core-samples show that the sediment is shallow in many places and rock has been taken at 36 cm. or less below the surface at a number of stations.

Samples totalling ½m.2 were taken at each station with a modified 'scoopsampler', covering 1/10m.2, which is briefly described.

Sources of error in sampling are considered in detail. Some species may evade the sampler and others live too deep in the sediment to be taken. A comparison against a Petersen grab and a new ' suction-corer' show that the scoop-sampler does take a reasonably quantitative sample. The number of species taken in successive hauls, when plotted against the log of the area sampled, approaches a straight-line relationship similar to that obtained by Williams (1950).

A statistical analysis is made of a series of samples taken at one station, and the variance between the two samples in each haul and between successive hauls calculated. At this pàrticular station the fauna in successive samples is shown to be fairly random.

A sieve of 2-2 mm. mesh was employed. Compared with a finer sieve losses in terms of numbers may be quite large, but the total weight taken is little affected.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , June 1953 , pp. 1 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J., 1899. On the fauna and bottom-deposits near the thirty-fathom line from the Eddystone to Start Point. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 5, pp. 365–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, F. A. J. & Harvey, H. W., 1950. The cycle of phosphorus in the waters of the English Channel. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 29, pp. 145–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkett, L., 1953. Change in the composition of the bottom fauna of the Dogger Bank area. Nature, Vol. 171, p. 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blegvad, H., 1925. Continued studies on the quantity of fish food in the sea bottom. Rept. Dan. Biol. Stat., No. 31, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar
Burdon-Jones, C, 1953. Records of British Enteropneusta. Nature, Vol. 171 (in the press).Google Scholar
Chevreux, E. & Fage, L., 1925. Amphipodes. Faune de France, T. 9, 488 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. H. N., 1948. Phosphate and fisheries. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 27, pp. 326–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, F. M., 1923. Quantitative studies on the fauna of the sea bottom. No. 1. Preliminary investigation of the Dogger Bank. Min. Agric. Fish., Fish. Invest., Ser. 11, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
Davis, F. M., 1925. Quantitative studies on the fauna of the sea bottom.No. 2. Results of the investigations in the southern North Sea, 1921–24. Min. Agric. Fish., Fish. Invest., Ser. 11, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1923. Polychetes errantes. Faune de France, T. 5, 488 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. & Hanley, S., 1853. A History of British Mollusca and their Shells, Vol. 1, 486 pp. London.Google Scholar
Ford, E., 1923. Animal communities of the level sea-bottom in the waters adjacent to Plymouth. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 13, pp. 164–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E. 1925. On the growth of some lamellibranchs in relation to the food supply of fishes. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 133 pp. 531–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, G. R., 1953. A new dredge for collecting burrowing animals. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 32, pp. 193–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, H. W., 1950. On the production of living matter in the sea off Plymouth. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 29, pp. 97–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holme, N. A., 1949. A new bottom-sampler. Journ. Mar. Biol.Assoc, Vol. 28, pp. 323–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holme, N. A., 1950a. The bottom-fauna of Great West Bay. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 29, pp. 163–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holme, N. A., 1950. Population-dispersion in Tellina tenuis da Costa. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 29, pp. 267–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, A. C., 1927. Preliminary experiments with Knudsen's bottom sampler for hard bottom. Medd. Komnt. Danmarks Havunderseg., Kobenhavn, Ser. Fisk., Bd. 8, No. 4, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Jones, N. S., 1951. The bottom fauna off the south of the Isle of Man. Journ. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 20, pp. 132–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, N. S., 1952. The bottom fauna and the food of flatfish off the Cumberland coast. Journ. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 21, pp. 182–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, S., 1938. Oceanography and the fluctuations in the abundance of marine animals.Presidential Address, Sect. D., Brit. Assoc. Rep., pp. 85–101.Google Scholar
King, W. B. R., 1950. Floor of the English Channel. Geol. Mag., Vol. 87, pp. 383-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, M., 1927. A bottom sampler for hard bottom. Medd. Komm. Danmarks Havunderseg., Kobenhavn, Ser. Fisk., Bd. 8, No. 3, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
Koehler, R., 1886. Contributions à Fétude des Entéropneustes. Recherches anatomiques sur le Balanoglossus sarniensis (nov. sp.). Internat. Monatsschr. Anat. Hist., Bd. 3, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Mare, M. F., 1942. A study of a marine benthic community with special reference to the micro-organisms. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 25, pp. 517–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molander, A. R., 1928. Investigations into the vertical distribution of the fauna of the bottom deposits in the Gullmar fjord. Svenska Hydrog.-Biol. Komm. Skrifter, Ser. Hydrografi 6, No. 6, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1937. Some interrelations between bivalve spatfalls, hydrography and fisheries. Nature, Vol. 140, pp. 505–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, C. G. J., 1918. The sea bottom and its production of fish-food. Rept. Dan. Biol. Stat., No. 25, pp. 1–62.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. G. J. & BoysenJensen, P. Jensen, P., 1911. Valuation of the sea. I. Animal life of the sea-bottom, its food and quantity. Rept. Dan. Biol. Stat., No. 20, pp. 1–76.Google Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G., 1947. An experiment in marine fish cultivation. IV. The bottom fauna and the food of flatfishes in a fertilized sea-loch (Loch Craiglin). Proc Roy. Soc. Edinb., B. Vol. 63, pp. 34–55.Google Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G., 1949. Further observations on changes in the bottom fauna of a fertilized sea loch. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 28, pp. 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G., 1950. A fish cultivation experiment in an arm of a sea-loch. IV. The bottom fauna of Kyle Scotnish. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, Vol. 64, pp. 65–108.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1939. Hydrographical and biological conditions in the North Sea as indicated by plankton organisms. Journ. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer., Vol. 14, pp. 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. E., 1932. The shell gravel deposits, and the infauna of the Eddystone grounds. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 18, pp. 243–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spooner, G. M., 1950. Notes on the Plymouth marine fauna: Amphipoda. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 29, pp. 247–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1923. Preliminary survey of the Scottish waters of the North Sea by the Petersen grab. Fish., Scotland, Sci. Invest., 1922, No. 3, pp. 1–121.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1928. Notes on the biology of Tellina tenuis da Costa. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 15, pp. 683–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepen, A. C., 1931. Notes on the biology of certain lamellibranchs on the Scottish coast. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 17, pp. 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1932. Notes on the biology of some lamellibranchs in the Clyde area. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 18 pp. 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steven, G. A., 1930. Bottom fauna and the food of fishes. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 16, pp. 677–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson, G., 1950. Reproductive and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biol. Rev., Vol. 25, pp. 1145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ursin, E., 1952. Change in the composition of the bottom fauna of the Dogger Bank area. Nature, Vol. 170, p. 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vevers, H. G., 1951. Photography of the sea floor. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 30, pp. 101–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1938. A revision of the amphipod genus Bathyporeia Lindstrom. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 23, pp. 211–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B., 1950. The application of the logarithmic series to the frequency of occurrence of plant species in quadrats. Journ. Ecol., Vol. 38, pp. 107–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1951. A biological difference between natural sea waters. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 30, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1952. The influence of the nature of the substratum on the metamorphosis of the larvae of marine animals, especially the larvae of Ophelia bicornis Savigny. Ann. Inst. Oceanogr., T. 27, pp. 49–156.Google Scholar
Winckworth, R., 1932. The British marine Mollusca. Journ. Conch., Vol. 19, pp. 211–52.Google Scholar