Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:59:14.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of macrobenthic assemblages of three fish estuarine nurseries and their importance as foraging grounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

Jonathan Selleslagh ,
Sandric Lesourd  and
Rachid Amara
Jonathan Selleslagh*
Affiliation:
Université Lille Nord de France ULCO, LOG, F-62930 Wimereux, France CNRS, UMR 8187, F-62930 Wimereux, France
Sandric Lesourd
Affiliation:
Université Lille Nord de France ULCO, LOG, F-62930 Wimereux, France CNRS, UMR 8187, F-62930 Wimereux, France
Rachid Amara
Affiliation:
Université Lille Nord de France ULCO, LOG, F-62930 Wimereux, France CNRS, UMR 8187, F-62930 Wimereux, France
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J. Selleslagh, Cemagref, UR EPBX, F-33612 Cestas Cedex, France email: Jonathan.Selleslagh@cemagref.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Macrobenthic assemblages were examined in three fish estuarine nurseries and related to environmental variables, as well as fish and macrocrustaceans, in order to assess and compare the potential foraging ground value of these systems. Macrobenthos was sampled in spring 2007 in the Canche, Authie and Somme estuaries (eastern English Channel, France). A total of 17, 28 and 23 macrobenthic taxa, with a clear dominance of amphipods (mainly Bathyporeia sarsi), polychaetes and bivalves, were recorded in the three estuaries respectively. Although predators (fish and macrocrustaceans) were abundant, relatively high densities of macrobenthos were observed: 876.2 ± 389.1, 595.4 ± 197.2 and 854.3 ± 281.2 ind. m-2 in the Canche, Authie and Somme, respectively. No significant difference in species richness, Shannon–Wiener diversity and density (total and dominant groups) of macrobenthos was observed between the three estuaries. Although the analysis of similarity and similarity percentages analyses indicated that macrobenthic assemblage was variable between Authie and Somme, results showed that macrobenthos resource was relatively high and similar in the three estuaries. Taking into account these considerations, the present study indicated a similar relative importance of the Canche, Authie and Somme estuaries as foraging grounds for fish and macrocrustaceans during spring. Multivariate analysis showed that macrobenthic assemblages were mainly driven by salinity and sediment characteristics in the Canche and Authie estuaries while in the Somme estuary sediment characteristics were the most influencing parameters.

Keywords

estuariesmacrobenthic assemblagesspatial variationsenvironmental influencefish nurseriesEastern English Channel
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 85 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amara, R. (2003) Seasonal ichthyodiversity and growth patterns of juvenile flatfish on a nursery ground in the Southern Bight of the North Sea (France). Environmental Biology of Fishes 67, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amara, R. and Paul, C. (2003) Seasonal patterns in the fish and epibenthic crustaceans community of an intertidal zone with particular reference to the population dynamics of plaice and brown shrimp. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 56, 807–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amara, R., Meziane, T., Gilliers, C., Hermel, G. and Laffargue, P. (2007) Growth and condition indices in juvenile sole Solea solea measured to assess the quality of essential fish habitat. Marine Ecology Progress Series 351, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amara, R., Selleslagh, J., Billon, G. and Minier, C. (2009) Growth and condition of 0-group European flounder, Platichthys flesus as indicator of estuarine habitat quality. Hydrobiologia 627, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, J.P., Yoklavich, M.M., Cailliet, G.M., Ambrose, D.A. and Antrim, B.S. (1996) Trophic ecology of the dominant fishes in Elkhorn Slough, California, 1974–1980. Estuaries 19, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, M., Heck, K., Able, K., Childers, D., Egglestone, D., Gillanders, B., Halpern, B., Hays, C., Hoshino, K., Minello, T., Orth, R., Sheridan, P. and Weinstein, M. (2001) The identification, conservation and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience 51, 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beukema, J.J., Essink, K., Michaelis, H. and Zwarts, L. (1993) Year-to-year variability in the biomass of macrobenthic animals on tidal flats of the Wadden Sea: how predictable is this food source for birds? Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 31, 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J., Rogers, S.I. and Frid, C.L.J. (2006) Matching biological traits to environmental conditions in marine benthic ecosystems. Journal of Marine Systems 60, 302–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabral, H.H. and Murta, A. (2004) Effect of sampling design on abundance estimates of benthic invertebrates in environmental monitoring studies. Marine Ecology Progress Series 276, 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. 2nd edition. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Cortelezzi, A., Capitulo, A.R., Boccardi, L. and Arocena, R. (2007) Benthic assemblages of a temperate estuarine system in South America: transition from a freshwater to an estuarine zone. Journal of Marine Systems 68, 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza, R., Darge, R., Degroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. and Vandenbelt, M. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, D.C., Cameron, D.D., Roberts, S.D., Hooper, G.E., Sorokin, S.J. and Ward, T.M. (2011) Relative importance of environmental gradients and historical trawling effort in determining the composition and distribution of benthic macro-biota in a large inverse estuary. Fisheries Research 107, 184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauvin, J.C. and Ruellet, T. (2008) Macrozoobenthic biomass in the Bay of Seine (eastern English Channel). Journal of Sea Research 59, 320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delpech, C., Courrat, A., Pasquaud, S., Lobry, J., Le Pape, O., Nicolas, D., Boët, P., Girardin, M. and Lepage, M. (2010) Development of a fish-based index to assess the ecological quality of transitional waters: the case of French estuaries. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60, 908–918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desprez, M., Ducrotoy, J.P. and Sylvand, B. (1986) Fluctuations naturelles et évolution artificielle des biocénoses macrozoobenthiques intertidales des trois estuaires des côtes françaises de la Manche. Hydrobiologia 142, 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desroy, N., Warembourg, C., Dewarumez, J.M. and Dauvin, J.C. (2002) Macrobenthic resources of the shallow soft-bottom sediments in the eastern English Channel and southern North Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 60, 120–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desroy, N., Janson, A.L., Denis, L., Charrier, G., Lesourd, S. and Dauvin, J.C. (2007) The intra-annual variability of soft-bottom macrobenthos abundance patterns in the North Channel of the Seine estuary. Hydrobiologia 588, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducrotoy, J.P. and Elkaim, B. (1992) Spatio-temporal changes in the distribution of macrobenthic communities in a megatidal estuary. ICES, CM, 348 pp.Google Scholar
França, S., Vinagre, C., Pardal, M.A. and Cabral, H.N. (2009) Spatial and temporal patterns of benthic invertebrates in the Tagus estuary, Portugal: comparison between subtidal and an intertidal mudflat. Scientia Marina 73, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, A., Fiorin, R., Zuchetta, M., Torricelli, P. and Franzoi, P. (2010) Flounder growth and production as indicators of the nursery value of marsh habitats in a Mediterranean lagoon. Journal of Sea Research 64, 457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R.N. (1994) Impact of habitat quality and quantity on the recruitment of juvenile flatfishes. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 32, 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J.S. (1974) Animal–sediment relationships. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 12, 223–262.Google Scholar
Hamer, G.L., Heske, E.J., Brawn, J.D. and Brown, P.W. (2006) Migrant shorebird predation on benthic invertebrates along the Illinois River, Illinois. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 118, 152–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, P.M.J., Middelburg, J.J., Van de Koppel, J. and Heip, C.H.R. (1999) Ecology of estuarine macrobenthos. Advances in Ecological Research 29, 195–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, R.J., Lincoln Smith, M.P. and Fairweather, P.G. (1995) Sieve mesh-size and taxonomic resolution needed to describe natural spatial variation of marine macrofauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series 118, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakiri, M., Berghahn, R. and Van der Veer, H.W. (1991) Variations in settlement and growth of 0-group plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) in the Dutch Wadden Sea as determined by otolith microstructure analysis. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 27, 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Pape, O., Chauvet, F., Mahévas, S., Lazure, P., Guérault, D. and Désaunay, Y. (2003) Quantitative description of habitat suitability for the juvenile common sole (Solea solea L.) in the Bay of Biscay (France) and the contribution of different habitats to the adult population. Journal of Sea Research 50, 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loizeau, J.L., Arbouille, D., Santoago, S. and Vernet, J.P. (1994) Evaluation of a wide range laser diffraction grain size analyser for use with sediments. Sedimentology 41, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzen, C.J. (1967) Determination of chlorophyll and phaeopigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnology and Oceanography 12, 343–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, J. (1988) Seasonal distribution, growth and ecological role of the juvenile sole, Solea solea L., population in the Loire estuary, France. Journal of Fish Biology 33, 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinho, F., Leitão, R., Neto, J.M., Cabral, H.N., Marques, J.C. and Pardal, M.A. (2007) The use of nursery areas by juvenile fish in a temperate estuary, Portugal. Hydrobiologia 587, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLusky, D.S. and Elliott, M. (2004) The estuarine ecosystem. Ecology, threats and management. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLusky, D.S., Hull, S.C. and Elliott, M. (1993) Variations in the intertidal and subtidal macrofauna and sediments along a salinity gradient in the upper Forth estuary. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 27, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modin, J. and Phil, L. (1994) Differences in growth and mortality of juvenile plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L., following normal and extremely high settlement. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 32, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, T. and Rosenberg, R. (1978) Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 16, 229–311.Google Scholar
Reise, K. (1991) Macrofauna in mud and sand of tropical and temperate tidal flats. In Elliott, M. and Ducrotoy, J.P. (eds) Estuaries and coasts: spatial and temporal intercomparisons. Fredenborg: Olsen and Olsen, pp. 211–216.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A.M., Meireles, S., Pereira, T., Gama, A. and Quintino, V. (2006) Spatial patterns of benthic macroinvertebrates in intertidal areas of a southern European estuary: the Tagus, Portugal. Hydrobiologia 555, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, S., Granadeiro, J.P., Vinagre, C., França, S., Cabral, H.N. and Palmeirim, J.M. (2008) Impact of predation on the polychaete Hediste diversicolor in estuarine intertidal flats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 78, 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salgado, J.P., Cabral, H.N. and Costa, M.J. (2007) Spatial and temporal distribution patterns of the macrozoobenthos assemblage in the salt marshes of Tejo estuary (Portugal). Hydrobiologia 587, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selleslagh, J. (2008) Fonctionnement des nourriceries intertidales et estuariennes: influence de l'environnement sur la dynamique et les performances physiologiques de l'ichtyofaune. PhD thesis. University of Littoral Côte d'Opale, Wimereux, France.Google Scholar
Selleslagh, J. and Amara, R. (2008) Environmental factors structuring fish composition and assemblages in a small macrotidal estuary (eastern English Channel). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 79, 507–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selleslagh, J., Amara, R., Laffargue, P., Lesourd, S., Lepage, M. and Girardin, M. (2009) Fish composition and assemblage structure in three eastern English Channel macrotidal estuaries: a comparison with other French estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 81, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, R., Dias, S. and Antunes, C. (2006) Spatial subtidal macrobenthic distribution in relation to abiotic conditions in the Lima estuary, NW of Portugal. Hydrobiologia 559, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, R., Dias, S., Freitas, V. and Antunes, C. (2008) Subtidal macrozoobenthic assemblages along the River Minho estuarine gradient (north-west Iberian Peninsula). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18, 1063–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67, 1167–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrush, S.F., Lawrie, S.M., Hewitt, J.E. and Cummings, V.J. (1999) The problem of scale: uncertainities and implications for soft-bottom marine communities and the assessment of human impacts. In Gray, T.S., Ambrose, W. Jr and Szaniawska, A. (eds) Marine biogeochemistry, NATO Advanced Research Workshop. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 195–210.Google Scholar
Van der Veer, H.W. and Witte, J.I.J. (1993) The maximum growth/optimal food condition hypothesis: a test for 0-group plaice Pleuronectes platessa in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 101, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinagre, C., França, S. and Cabral, H.N. (2006) Diel and semi-lunar patterns in the use of an intertidal mudflat by juveniles of Senegal sole, Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 69, 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wouters, N. and Cabral, H.N. (2009) Are flatfish nursery grounds richer in benthic prey? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 83, 613–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ysebaert, T. and Herman, P.M.J. (2002) Spatial and temporal variation in benthic macrofauna and relationships with environmental variables in an estuarine, intertidal soft-sediment environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 244, 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ysebaert, T., Meire, P., Coosen, J. and Essink, K. (1998) Zonation of intertidal macrobenthos in the estuaries of Schelde and Ems. Aquatic Ecology 32, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar