Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:54:25.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Distribution and significance of organically bound iodine in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis Linnaeus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

E. J. W. Barrington
E. J. W. Barrington
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University, Nottingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some features of the organization of the endostyle of Ciona intestinalis are described. Autoradiographs show that bound iodine is present in a limited area of the epithelium (zone 7), where it is associated with characteristic secretory inclusions which are found only in this zone. These are regarded as providing the molecular basis for the iodination process, and are termed 'thyroidal granules', since they resemble in certain properties the similarly named granules of the endostyle of the ammocoete; it is concluded that they are homologous with these and, through them, with thyroid colloid. Their existence provides evidence that the iodination process is a product of biochemical specialization, and implies that it results in the formation of an hormonal secretion. It is concluded from the distribution of bound iodine over the pharyngeal epithelium and in the food cords that this iodinated secretion is carried in the latter into the intestine. Bound iodine is also present in the cuticle of the test; it is suggested that this may differ from the situation in the endostyle in being a consequence of the iodination of a skeletal protein secretion such as is known to occur in many invertebrates. Prior immersion of the animals in thiouracil solution largely eliminates bound radio-iodine from all of the sites mentioned, although a little may sometimes be detectable in the food cords and cuticle. The results are discussed in the light of recent work on Amphioxus and the ammocoete larva, and attention is drawn to their bearing on current views on the relationship between vertebrates and protochordates.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 1957 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C. W. M., 1956. A stricter interpretation of the ferric ferricyanide reaction. J. Histochem. Cytochem., Vol. 4, pp. 23–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrington, E. J. W. & Franchi, L. L., 1956 a. Organic binding of iodine in the endostyle of Ciona intestinalis. Nature, Lond., Vol. 177, p. 432Google Scholar
Barrington, E. J. W. & Franchi, L. L., 1956 b. Some cytological characteristics of thyroidal function in the endostyle of the ammocoete larva. Quart. J. micr. Set., Vol. 97, pp. 393–410.Google Scholar
Berrill, N. J., 1950. The Tunicata. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Berrill, N. J., 1955. The Origin of Vertebrates. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. T., 1914. The distribution of iodine in plant and animal tissue. J. biol. Chem., Vol. 18, 335–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. T., 1915. The distribution of iodine in plant and animal tissue. J. biol. Chem., Vol. 23, pp. 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, E. R., 1953. Observations on thyroid colloid. Arch. Path., Vol. 56, pp. 275–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Garstang, W., 1929. The morphology of the Tunicata, and its bearing on the phylogeny of the Chordata. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 72, pp. 51–187.Google Scholar
Gorbman, A., 1941. Identity of an iodine-storing tissue in an ascidian. Science, Vol. 94, p. 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorbman, A., 1955. Some aspects of the comparative biochemistry of iodine utilization and the evolution of thyroidal function. Physiol. Rev., Vol. 35, pp. 336–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorbman, A., Clements, M. & O'brien, R., 1954. Utilization of radio-iodine by invertebrates, with special study of several annelids and mollusca. J. exp. Zool., Vol. 127, pp. 75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüus, J., 1937. Tunicata: Ascidiaceae. Handb. Zool. Berl., Bd. 5, Hlf. 2, pp. 545–672.Google Scholar
Leloup, J. & Berg, O., 1954. Sur la presence d'acides amino-iodes dans l'endostyle de l'Ammocoete. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 238, p. 1069.Google Scholar
Millar, R. H., 1953. Ciona. L.M.B.C. Memoir No. 35. (Liverpool: University Press).Google Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1913. The ciliary mechanisms of the gill and the mode of feeding in Amphioxus, ascidians and Solenomya togata. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 10, pp. 19–49.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E., 1954. Histochemistry, theoretical and applied. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Peres, J. M., 1948. Recherches sur la genese et la regeneration de la tunique chez Clavelina lepadiformis Müller. Arch. Anat. micr. Morph. exp., T. 37, pp. 230–60.Google Scholar
Rawson, R. W., Rall, J. E. & Sonenberg, M., 1955. The chemistry and physiology of the thyroid. The Hormones (ed. Pincus, & Thimann, ), Vol. 3, pp. 434–519.Google Scholar
Roche, J. & Michel, R., 1955. Nature, biosynthesis and metabolism of thyroid hormones. Physiol. Rev., Vol. 35, pp. 583–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roule, L., 1884. Recherches sur les ascidies simples des cotes de Provence. Ann. Mus. Hist. nat. Marseille, T. 2, pp. 1–270.Google Scholar
Sembrat, K., 1953. Effect of the endostyle of the lancelet (Branchiostoma lanceolatum Pall.) on the metamorphosis of axolotl. Zool. Polon., Vol. 6, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
Sokólska, J., 1931. Contribution à l'histologie de l'endostyle des ascides. Folia Morph., Warsz. T. 3, pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
Spaul, E. A., 1928. Comparative studies of accelerated amphibian metamorphosis. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 5, pp. 212–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, I. M., 1956. The accumulation of radioactive iodine by Amphioxus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 35, pp. 203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar