Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:05:33.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The gregarious behaviour of the larvae of Ostrea edulis L. at settlement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

B. L. Bayne
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Shellfish Culture Unit, Benarth Road, Con way, North Walescor1corresp
*

Extract

The settlement behaviour of the larvae of Ostrea edulis has been examined in the laboratory. Preliminary experiments indicated that high light intensities (1250 lux) and food-cell concentrations (100,000 cells/larva) stimulated settlement, but varying the temperatures within the range 19–23 °C had little effect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bitter, T. & Ewns, R., 1961. A modified carbazole reaction for uronic acids. Bwchem. J., Vol. 81, pp. 43P.Google Scholar
Clarke, P. J. & Evans, F. C., 1954. Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology, Vol. 35, pp. 445–53.Google Scholar
Cole, H. A., 1938. The fate of the larval organs in the metamorphosis of Ostrea edulis. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 22, pp. 469–84.Google Scholar
Cole, H. A. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1939. Some observations and experiments on the setting behaviour of larvae of Ostrea edulis. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 14, pp. 85105.Google Scholar
Cole, H. A. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1949. The setting behaviour of larvae of the European flat oyster Ostrea edulis L., and its influence on methods of cultivation and spat collection. Fish. Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 139.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1961. Territorial behaviour in barnacle settlement. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 38, pp. 429–46.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1965. Surface chemistry, a factor in the settlement of marine invertebrate larvae. Proc. Fifth Marine Biol. Symp.: Botanica Gothoburgensia, Vol. 3, PP. 5165.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1967. Chemical factors inducing settlement in Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 36, pp. 329–36.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Meadows, P. S., 1962. The chemical basis of gregariousness in cirripedes. Proc. toy. Soc. B, Vol. 156, pp. 500–20.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Meadows, P. S., 1963. Adsorbed layers: the stimulus to settlement in barnacles. Proc. roy. Soc. B, Vol. 158, pp. 364–87.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, G. S. & Gunn, D. L., 1961. The Orientation of Animals. Dover edition. 376 pp.Google Scholar
Galstoff, P. S., 1964. The American oyster, Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Fish. Bull. U.S., Vol. 64, pp. 1480.Google Scholar
Grave, C., 1941. Further studies of metamorphosis of ascidian larvae. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 81, pp. 286–7.Google Scholar
Grave, C. & Nicholl, P. A., 1940. Studies on larval life and metamorphosis in Ascidia nigra and species of Polyandrocarpa. Pap. Tortugas Lab., Vol. 32, pp. 146.Google Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1951. Gregariousness and some other aspects of the setting behaviour of Spirorbis. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 30, pp. 201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W. & Stevenson, J. P., 1950. Gregariousness during settlement in the barnacle Elminius modestus Darwin. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 281–97.Google Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Roseborough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J., 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. biol. Chem., Vol. 193, pp. 265–75.Google Scholar
Meadows, P. S. & Williams, G. B., 1963. Settlement of Spirorbis borealis Daudin larvae on surfaces bearing films of micro-organisms. Nature, Lond., Vol. 198, pp. 610–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomoto, M., Narakashi, Y. & Murakami, M., 1960. A proteolytic enzyme of Streptomyces griseus. VI. Hydrolysis of protein by Streptomyces griseus protease. J. Biochem., Tokyo, Vol. 48, pp. 593601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prytherch, H. F., 1934. The role of copper in the setting, metamorphosis and distribution of the American oyster, Ostrea virginica. Ecol. Monogr., Vol. 4, pp. 49107.Google Scholar
Reese, E. S., 1964. Ethology and marine zoology. Oceanogr. mar. biol., Vol. 2, pp. 455–88.Google Scholar
Walne, P. R., 1966. Experiments in the large-scale culture of the larvae of Ostrea edulis L. Fish. Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 153.Google Scholar
Wilbur, K. M., 1964. Shell formation and regeneration. In Physiology of Mollusca, Vol. 1, pp. 243–82. Eds. Wilbur, K. M. and Yonge, C. M..Google Scholar
Williams, G. B., 1964. The effect of extracts of Fucus serratus in promoting the settlement of larvae of Spirorbis borealis (Polychaeta). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 397414.Google Scholar
Winzler, R. J., 1955. Determination of serum glycoproteins. In Methods of Bio-chemical Analysis, Vol. 2, pp. 279311.Google Scholar
Wisely, B., 1960. Observations on the settling behaviour of larvae of the tubeworm Spirorbis borealis Daudin (Polychaeta). Anst. J. mar. Freshwat. Res., Vol. 2, pp. 5572.Google Scholar