Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-16T02:49:46.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Pennatulid Kophobelemnon stelliferum (Cnidaria: Octocorallia) in the Porcupine Seabight (north-east Atlantic Ocean)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A.L. Rice ,
P.A. Tyler  and
G.J.L. Paterson
A.L. Rice
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Deacon Laboratory, Wormley, Godalming, Surrey, GU8 5UB.
P.A. Tyler
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, The University, Southampton, SO9 5NH.
G.J.L. Paterson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The upper bathyal sea-pen Kophobelemnon stelliferum extends to depths of about 1600 m in the Porcupine Seabight, to the south-west of Ireland, but is rare below about 1150 m. Photographic data suggest that the species attains numerical abundances of more than 2 m−2and a wet weight biomass of at least 4 g m−2. The highest densities, however, do not necessarily correspond to the highest biomass values since there is a clear depth-related change in population structure. The largest sea-pens are restricted to the deeper parts of the bathymetric range of the species. There is also a marked change in the growth form at a total colony length of about 250 mm, with larger colonies having relatively more polyps than smaller ones. The sexes are separate in Kophobelemnon stelliferum and the sex ratio of colonies is about 1:1. The maximum oocyte diameter is about 800 μm, but there is no evidence of seasonal reproduction by this pennatulid in the Porcupine Seabight.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , May 1992 , pp. 417 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chia, F.S. & Crawford, B.J., 1973. Some observations on gametogenesis, larval development and substratum selection of the sea-pen Ptilosarcus guerneyi. Marine Biology, 23, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasshoff, M. Von, 1981a. Die Gorgonaria, Pennatularia und Antipatharia des Tiefwassers der Biskaya (Cnidaria, Anthozoa). Ergebnisse der französischen Expeditionen Biogas, Polygas, Geomanche, Incal, Noratlante und Fahrten der ‘Thalassa’. I. Allgemeiner Teil. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle. Paris, (4e série), 3(A), 731–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasshoff, M. Von, 1981b. Die Gorgonaria, Pennatularia und Antipatharia des Tiefwassers der Biskaya (Cnidaria, Anthozoa). Ergebnisse der französischen Expeditionen Biogas, Polygas, Geomanche, Incal, Noratlante und Fahrten der ‘Thalassa’. II. Taxonomischer Teil. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle. Paris, (4e série), 3(A), 941–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecker, B., Blechschmidt, G. & Gibson, P., 1980. Epifaunal zonation and community structure in three mid- and north Atlantic canyons. Report for US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. Palisades, New York: Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory.Google Scholar
Hyman, L.H., 1940. The Invertebrates: Protozoa through Ctenophora. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jungersen, H.F.E., 1904. Pennatulida. Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 5, 1–95.Google Scholar
Kastendiek, J., 1982. Factors determining the distribution of the sea pansy, Renilla kollikeri, in a subtidal sand-bottom habitat. Oecologia, 52, 340–347.Google Scholar
Koehl, M.A.R., 1977. Effects of sea anemones on the flow forces they encounter. Journal of Experimental Biology, 69, 87–105.Google Scholar
Kölliker, A., 1872. Anatomisch-systematische Beschreibung der Alcyonarien. Die Pennatuliden. Abhandlungen hrsg. von der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 8, 85–275.Google Scholar
Kükenthal, W., 1915. Pennatularia. Das Tierreich, 43, 132 pp.Google Scholar
Lampitt, R.S., Billett, D.S.M. & Rice, A.L., 1986. Biomass of the invertebrate megabenthos from 500 to 4100 m in the northeast Atlantic Ocean. Marine Biology, 93, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, R.W., Langton, E.W., Theroux, R.B. & Uzmann, J.R., 1990. Distribution, behavior and abundance of sea-pens, Pennatula aculeata, in the Gulf of Maine. Marine Biology, 107, 463–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Danois, E., 1948. Les Profondeurs de la Mer. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Muirhead, A., Tyler, P.A. & Thurston, M.H., 1986. Reproductive biology and growth of the genus Epizoanthus (Zoanthidea) from the north-east Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 66, 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, S., 1983. Photographic census of large-sized benthic organisms in the bathyal zone of Suruga Bay, central Japan. Bulletin of the Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 15, 244 pp.Google Scholar
Pasternak, F.A., 1970. Sea-pens (Octocorallia, Pennatularia) of the hadal zone of the Kurile-Kamchatka trench. In Fauna of the Kurile-Kamchatka trench and its environment (ed. V.G., Bogorov), pp. 250–263. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1972. [Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Proceedings of the Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, vol. 86.]Google Scholar
Pasternak, F.A., 1989. On the variability of sea-pens (Octocorallia: Pennatulacea) connected with the transition to the deep-water existence. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii. Akademiya Nauk SSSR. Moskva, 123, 165–172.Google Scholar
Pennington, J.T., 1985. The ecology of fertilization of echinoid eggs: the consequences of sperm dilution, adult aggregation, and synchronous spawning. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 169, 417–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, A.L., Aldred, R.G., Darlington, E. & Wild, R. A., 1982. The quantitative estimation of the deep-sea megabenthos: a new approach to an old problem. Oceanologica Acta, 5, 63–72.Google Scholar
Rice, A.L., Billett, D.S.M., Thurston, M.H. & Lampitt, R.S., 1991. The Institute of Oceanographic Sciences biology programme in the Porcupine Seabight: background and general introduction. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 281–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, A.L., Thurston, M.H. & New, A.L., 1990. Dense aggregations of a hexactinellid sponge, Pheronema carpenteri, in the Porcupine Seabight (northeast Atlantic Ocean), and possible causes. Progress in Oceanography, 24, 179–196.Google Scholar
Rowe, G.T., 1971. Observations on bottom currents and epibenthic populations in Hatteras Submarine Canyon. Deep-Sea Research, 18, 569–581.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J., 1969. Biometry. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Stephens, J., 1909. Alcyonarian and madreporarian corals of the Irish coasts. Scientific Investigations of the Fisheries Branch, Department of Agriculture and Technical Instruction for Ireland, 5, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Tyler, P. A., 1986. Studies of a benthic time series: reproductive biology of benthic invertebrates in the Rockall Trough. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 88B, 175–190.Google Scholar
Tyler, P. A., Grant, A., Pain, S.L. & Gage, J.D., 1982. Is annual reproduction in deep-sea echinoderms a response to variability in their environment? Nature, London, 300, 747–750.Google Scholar
Utinomi, H., 1958. On some octocorals from deep waters of Prov. Tosa, Sikoku. Publications of the Seto Marine Laboratory, Japan, 7, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van-Praët, M., 1990. Gametogenesis and the reproductive cycle in the deep-sea anemone Paracalliactis stephensoni (Cnidaria: Actiniaria). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 70, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van-Praët, M. & Duchateau, G., 1984. Mise en évidence chez une actinie abyssale (Paracalliactis stephensoni) d'un cycle saisonnier de reproduction. Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 299, 687–690.Google Scholar
Van-Praët, M., Rice, A.L. & Thurston, M.H., 1990. Reproduction in two deep-sea anemones (Actiniaria); Phelliactis hertwigi and P. robusta. Progress in Oceanography, 24, 207–222.Google Scholar
Verrill, A.E., 1884. Notice of the remarkable marine fauna occurring off the outer banks off the southern coast of New England, no. 9. American Journal of Science, 28, 213–220.Google Scholar
Young, C.M., Tyler, P. A., Cameron, J.L. & Rumrill, S.G., in press. Seasonal breeding aggregations in low-density populations of the bathyal echinoid Stylocidaris lineata. Marine Biology.Google Scholar