Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-16T02:54:56.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phagocyte interactions in echinoid and asteroid echinoderms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R.P. Dales
R.P. Dales
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Royal Holloway & Bedford New College, (University of London), Egham, Surrey, TW20 OEX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phagocytes of the starfishes Asterias rubens L., and Marthasterias ghcialis (L.) (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) phagocytose allogeneic and xenogeneic phagocytes in vivo, but form non-reactive aggregates or syncytia in vitro. The coelomocytes of the sea urchins Echinus esculentus (Mortensen) and Psammechimts miliaris (Gmelin), (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) also form aggregates or syncytia with allogeneic and xenogeneic cells in vitro. Mutual cy totoxicity could not be demonstrated either by enzyme-release or by decrease in numbers of viable cells in cultures of mixed origin as compared with autogeneic controls. The factors which may govern cell recognition and behaviour are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , May 1992 , pp. 473 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergmeyer, H.-U., 1965. Methods of enzymatic analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bertheussen, K., 1979. The cytotoxic reaction in allogeneic mixtures of echinoid phagocytes. Experimental Cell Research, 120, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertheussen, K. & Seljelid, R., 1978. Echinoid phagocytes in vitro. Experimental Cell Research, 111, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boildieu, D. & Valembois, P., 1977. Natural cytotoxic activity of sipunculid leukocytes on allogeneic and xenogeneic erythrocytes. Developmental and Comparative Immunology, 1,207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruslé, J., 1967. Homogreffes et hétérogreffes réciproques du tegument et des gonades chez Asterina gibbosa Pennant et Asterina pancerii Gasco (Échinodernes, Astérides). Cahirs de Biologie Marine, 8, 417–420.Google Scholar
Coffaro, K.A. & Hinegardner, R.T., 1977. Immune response in the sea urchin Eytechinus pictus. Science, New York, 197, 1389–1390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, E.L., 1973. Earthworm coelomocytes: role in understanding the evolution of cellular immunity. I. Formation of monolayers and cytotoxicity. Proceedings of the third International Tissue Culture Coloquium (ed. J., Rehaceket al.), pp. 381–404. Czechoslovakian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Fuke, M.T., 1980. ‘Contact reactions’ between xenogeneic or allogeneic coelomic cells of solitary ascidians. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 158, 304–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiradella, H.T., 1965. The reaction of two starfishes, Patiria miniata and Asterias forbesi, to foreign tissue in the coelom. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 128, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillman, T.L. & Wright, L.J., 1966. Probable in vivo origin of multi-nucleated giant cells from circulating mononuclears. Nature, London, 209, 263–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hildemann, W.H. & Dix, T.C., 1972. Transplantation reactions of tropical Australian echinoderms. Transplantation, 25, 624–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, L. & Hay, F.C., 1980. Practical Immunology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Karp, R.D. & Hildemann, W.H., 1976. Specific allograft reactivity in the sea star Dermasterias imbricata. Transplantation, 22, 434–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korzeniewski, C. & Callewaert, D.M., 1983. An enzyme-release assay for natural cytotoxicity. Journal of Immunological Methods, 64, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moscona, A., 1961. Rotation-mediated histogenic aggregation of dissociated cells. Experimental Cell Research, 22, 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinisch, C.L. & Bang, F.B., 1971. Cell recognition: reactions of the sea star (Asterias vulgaris) to the injection of amebocytes of sea urchin (Arbacia punctulata). Cellular Immunology, 2, 496–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieber, F. & Roseman, S., 1981. Quantitative analysis of intercellular specificity in freshly explanted and cultured cells. Journal of Cell Biology, 90, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed