Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:46:20.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phytoplankton community composition in the south-eastern Black Sea determined with pigments measured by HPLC-CHEMTAX analyses and microscopy cell counts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2014

Ertugrul Agirbas*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Fisheries, Department of Marine Biology, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100 Rize, Turkey
Ali Muzaffer Feyzioglu
Affiliation:
Faculty of Marine Science and Technology, Department of Fisheries Technology, Karadeniz Technical University, 61530 Camburnu-Trabzon, Turkey
Ulgen Kopuz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Fisheries, Department of Marine Biology, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100 Rize, Turkey
Carole A. Llewellyn
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1-3DH, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: E. Agirbas, Faculty of Fisheries, Department of Marine Biology, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100 Rize, Turkey email: eagirbas@gmail.com

Abstract

The phytoplankton community structure and abundance in the south-eastern Black Sea was measured from February to December 2009 using and comparing high performance liquid chromatography pigment and microscopy analyses. The phytoplankton community was characterized by diatoms, dinoflagellates and coccolithophores, as revealed by both techniques. Fucoxanthin, diadinoxanthin, peridinin and 19′-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin were the main accessory pigments showing significant correlation with diatom-C r2 = 0.56–0.71, P < 0.05), diatom-C (r2 = 0.85–0.91, P < 0.001), dinoflagellate-C (r2 = 0.39–0.88, P < 0.05) and coccolithophore-C (r2 = 0.80–0.71, P < 0.05), respectively. Microscopy counts indicated a total of 89 species, 71% of which were dinoflagellates, 23% were diatoms and 6% other species (mainly coccolithophores). Pigment-CHEMTAX analysis also indicated the presence of pico- and nanoplankton. Phytoplankton carbon (phyto-C) concentrations were highest in the upper water column, whereas chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) showed a deep maximum. Average phyto-C was higher at the coastal station (291 ± 66 µg l−1) than at the offshore station (258 ± 35 µg l−1), not statistically different (P > 0.05). The coastal station also had higher Chl-a concentrations (0.52–3.83 µg l−1) compared to the offshore station (0.63–2.55 µg l−1), not significant (P > 0.05). Our results are consistent with other studies and indicate that the southern Black Sea is shifting towards mesotrophy with the increasing prevalence of dinoflagellates compared to diatoms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aiken, J., Pradhan, Y., Barlow, R., Lavender, S., Poulton, A., Holligan, P. and Hardman-Mountford, N. (2009) Phytoplankton pigments and functional types in the Atlantic Ocean: a decadal assessment, 1995–2005. Deep-Sea Research Part II—Topical Studies in Oceanography 56, 899917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balech, E. (1988) Los dinoflaelados del Atlantici sudoccidental. Madrid: Publicaciones Especiales, Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia.Google Scholar
Barlow, R.G., Aiken, J., Moore, G.F., Holligan, P.M. and Lavender, S. (2004) Pigment adaptations in surface phytoplankton along the eastern boundary of the Atlantic Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 281, 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, R.G., Mantoura, R.F.C., Gough, M.A. and Fileman, T.W. (1993) Pigment signatures of the phytoplankton composition in the northeastern Atlantic during the 1990 spring bloom. Deep Sea Research II 40, 459477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodeanu, N. (1989) Algal blooms and development the marine phytoplankton species at the Romanian Black Sea littoral under eutrophication conditions. Cercetari Marine 22, 107125.Google Scholar
Bodeanu, N. (1993) Microalgal blooms in the Romanian area of the Black Sea and contemporary eutrophycation conditions. In Smayda, T.J. and Shimizu, Y. (eds) Toxic phytoplankton blooms in the sea. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 203209.Google Scholar
Bodeanu, N., Moncheva, S., Ruta, G. and Popa, L. (1998) Long-term evolution of the algal blooms in Romanian and Bulgarian Black Sea waters. Cercetari Marine 31, 3755.Google Scholar
Bologa, A.S. (1986) Planktonic primary productivity of the Black Sea: a review. Thalassia Jugoslavica 21–22, 122.Google Scholar
Bologa, A.S., Bodeanu, N., Petran, A., Tiganus, V. and Zaitsev Yu, P. (1995) Major modifications of the Black Sea benthic and planktonic biota in the last three decades. Bulletin de l'Institut Océanographique, 15. Monaco: CIESM Science Series, pp. 85110.Google Scholar
Booth, B.C. (1993) Estimating cell concentration and biomass of autotrophic plankton using microscopy. In Kemp, P.F., Sherr, B.F. and Cole, J.J. (eds) Handbook of methods in aquatic microbial ecology. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 199205.Google Scholar
Brewin, R.J.W., Sathyendranath, S., Hirata, T., Lavender, S.J., Barciela, R.M. and Hardman-Mountford, N.J. (2010) A three-component model of phytoplankton size class for the Atlantic Ocean. Ecological Modelling 221, 14721483.Google Scholar
Cermeno, P., Dutkiewiczb, S., Harrisc, R.P., Followsb, M., Schofielda, O. and Falkowski, P.G. (2008) The role of nutricline depth in regulating the ocean carbon cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 2034420349.Google Scholar
Claustre, H. and Marthy, J.C. (1995) Specific phytoplankton biomasses and their relation to primary production in the tropical North Atlantic. Deep Sea Research-I 42, 14751493.Google Scholar
Cloern, J.E., Grenz, C. and Vidergar-Lucas, L. (1995) An empirical model of the phytoplankton chlorophyll:carbon ratio—the conversion factor between productivity and growth rate. Limnology and Oceanography 40, 13131321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coban-Yildiz, Y., Tugrul, S., Ediger, D., Yilmaz, A. and Polat, S.C. (2000) A Comparative study on the abundance and elemental composition of POM in three interconnected basins: the Black, the Marmara and the Mediterranean Seas. Mediterranean Marine Science 1, 5163.Google Scholar
Cociasu, A., Diaconu, V., Popa, L., Buga, L., Nae, I., Dorogan, L. and Malciu, V. (1997) The nutrient stock of the Romanian shelf of the Black Sea during the last three decades. In Ozsoy, E. and Mikaelyan, A. (eds) Sensitivity to change: Black Sea, Baltic Sea and North Sea. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing, pp. 4963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cociasu, A., Dorogan, L., Humborg, C. and Popa, L. (1996) Long-term ecological changes in Romanian coastal waters of the Black Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin 32, 3238.Google Scholar
Ediger, D., Soydemir, N. and Kideys, A.E. (2006) Estimation of phytoplankton biomass using HPLC pigment analysis in the Southwestern Black Sea. Deep-Sea Research Part II 53, 19111922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eker, E., Georgieva, L., Senichkina, L. and Kideys, A.E. (1999) Phytoplankton distribution in the western and wastern Black Sea in spring and autumn 1995. ICES Journal of Marine Science 56, 1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eker-Develi, E., Berthon, J.F., Canuti, E., Slabakova, N., Moncheva, S., Shtereva, G. and Dzhurova, B. (2012) Phytoplankton taxonomy based on CHEMTAX and microscopy in the Northwestern Black Sea. Journal of Marine Systems 94, 1832.Google Scholar
Eker-Develi, E., Berthon, J.F. and Linde, D. (2008) Phytoplankton class determination by microscopic and HPLC-CHEMTAX analyses in the southern Baltic Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 359, 6987.Google Scholar
Eker-Develi, E. and Kideys, A.E. (2003) Distribution of phytoplankton in the southern Black Sea in summer 1996, spring and sutumn1998. Journal of Marine Systems 39, 203211.Google Scholar
Escaravage, V., Prins, T.C., Nijdam, C., Smaal, A.C. and Peeters, J.C.H. (1999) Response of phytoplankton communities to nitrogen input reduction in mesocosm experiments. Marine Ecology Progress Series 179, 187199.Google Scholar
Falkowski, P.G. and Raven, J.A. (2007) Aquatic photosynthesis. 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feyzioglu, A.M. (1994) Seasonal changes at the net phytoplankton living Trabzon coasts of Eastern Black Sea. Turkish Journal of Biology 18, 161171.Google Scholar
Feyzioglu, A.M. and Seyhan, K. (2007) Phytoplankton composition of south east Black Sea Coast. Journal of the Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment 13, 6171.Google Scholar
Fukuyo, Y., Takano, H., Chihara, M. and Matsuoka, K. (1990) Red tide organisms in Japan (An illustrated taxonomic guide). Tokyo: Uchida Rokakuho Publishing, 407 pp.Google Scholar
Garibotti, I.A., Vernet, M., Kozlowski, W.A. and Ferrario, M.E. (2003) Composition and biomass of phytoplankton assemblages in coastal Antarctic waters: a comparison of chemotaxonomic and microscopic analyses. Marine Ecology Progress Series 247, 2742.Google Scholar
Geider, R.J. (1987) Light and temperature dependence of the carbon to chlorophyll-a ratio in microalgae and cyanobacteria—implications for physiology and growth of phytoplankton. New Phytology 6, 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, S.W., Barlow, R.G., Cummings, D.G., Rees, N.W., Trees, C.C., Holligan, P. and Suggett, D. (2000) Surface phytoplankton pigment distributions in the Atlantic Ocean: an assessment of basin scale variability between 50°N and 50°S. Progress in Oceanography 45, 339368.Google Scholar
Gieskes, W.W.C. and Kraay, G.W. (1983) Dominance of Cryptophyceae during the phytoplankton spring bloom in the Central North Sea detected by HPLC analysis of pigments. Marine Biology 75, 179185.Google Scholar
Havskum, H., Schlüter, L., Scharek, R., Berdalet, E. and Jacquet, S. (2004) Routine quantification of phytoplankton groups—microscopy or pigment analyses? Marine Ecology Progress Series 273, 3142.Google Scholar
Haxo, F. (2004) Photosynthetic action spectrum of the Coccolithophorid, Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyceae): 19′-hexanoyloxyfucoxsantin as antenna pigment. Journal of Phycology 21, 282287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, B., Honjo, S., Kempe, S., Itekkot, V.A., Degens, E.T., Konuk, T. and Izdar, E. (1990) Interannual variability in particle flux in the southwestern Black Sea. Deep-Sea Research I 37, 911928.Google Scholar
Higgins, H.W., Wright, S.W. and Schlüter, L. (2011) Quantitative interpretation of chemotaxonomic pigment data. In Roy, S., Llewellyn, C.A., Egeland, E.S. and Johnson, G. (eds) Phytoplankton pigments: characterization, chemotaxonomy and applications in oceanography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 257313.Google Scholar
Humborg, C., Venugopalan, I., Cociasu, A. and Bodungen, B.V. (1997) Effect of Danube river dam on Black Sea biogeochemistry and ecosystem structure. Nature 386, 385388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias-Rodriguez, M.D., Halloran, P.R., Rickaby, R.E.M., Hall, I.R., Colmenero-Hidalgo, E., Gittins, J.R., Green, D.R.H., Tyrrell, T., Gibbs, S.J., von Dassow, P., Rehm, E., Armbrust, E.V. and Boessenkool, K.P. (2008) Phytoplankton calcification in a high-CO2 world. Science 320, 336340.Google Scholar
Irigoien, X., Meyer, B., Harris, R. and Harbour, D. (2004) Using HPLC pigment analysis to investigate phytoplankton taxonomy: the importance of knowing your species. Helgoland Marine Research 58, 7782.Google Scholar
Ivanov, A.I. (1965) Characteristics qualitative analysis of the Black Sea phytoplankton. Investigation of plankton in the Black Sea and Azov Sea-Kiev. Naukova Dumka 1735. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Jeffrey, S.W. and Vesk, M. (1997) Introduction to marine phytoplankton and their pigment signatures. In Jeffrey, S.W., Mantoura, R.F.C. and Wright, S.W. (eds) Phytoplankton pigments in oceanography: guidelines to modern methods. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 1936.Google Scholar
Karacam, H. and Duzgunes, E. (1990) A study on the phytoplankton of Trabzon coast. Istanbul University. Journal of Aquatic Products 4, 95102.Google Scholar
Kideys, A.E. (1994) Recent dramatic changes in the Black Sea ecosystem: the reason for the sharp decline in Turkish anchovy fisheries. Journal of Marine Systems 5, 171181.Google Scholar
Kopuz, U., Feyzioglu, A.M. and Agirbas, E. (2012) Picoplankton dynamics during late spring 2010 in the South-Eastern Black Sea. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 12, 397405.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, W.A., Deutschman, D., Garibotti, I., Trees, C. and Vernet, M. (2011) An evaluation of the application of CHEMTAX to Antarctic coastal pigment data. Deep-Sea Research I 58, 350364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitus, S. (1982) Climatological atlas of the world ocean. NOAA Professional Paper 13, US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Litchman, E., Klausmeier, C.A., Schofield, O. and Falkowski, P.G. (2007) The role of functional traits and trade-offs in structuring phytoplankton communities: scaling from cellular to ecosystem level. Ecology Letters 10, 11701181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llewellyn, C., Fishwick, J.R. and Blackford, J.C. (2005) Phytoplankton community assemblage in the English Channel: a comparison using chlorophyll a derived from HPLC-CHEMTAX and carbon derived from microscopy cell counts. Journal of Plankton Research 27, 103119.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, C.A. and Gibb, S.W. (2000) Intra-class variability in the carbon, pigment and biomineral content of prymnesiophytes and diatoms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 193, 3344.Google Scholar
Longhurst, A. (2007) Ecological geography of the sea. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mackas, D.L. (2011) Does blending of chlorophyll data bias temporal trend? Nature 472, E4E5.Google Scholar
Mackey, M.D., Mackey, D.J., Higgins, H.W. and Wright, S.W. (1996) CHEMTAX—a program for estimating class abundances from chemical markers: application to HPLC measurements of phytoplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series 144, 265283.Google Scholar
Mantoura, R.F.C. and Llewellyn, C.A. (1983) The rapid determination of algal chlorophyll-a and carotenoid pigments and their breakdown products in natural waters by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography. Analytica Chimica Acta 151, 297314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuatters-Gollop, A., Mee, L.D., Raitsos, D.E. and Shapiro, G.I. (2008) Non-linearities, regime shifts and recovery: the recent influence of climate on Black Sea chlorophyll. Journal of Marine Systems 74, 649658.Google Scholar
Mee, L.D. (1992) The Black Sea in crisis: the need for concerted international action. Ambio 21, 278286.Google Scholar
Menden-Deuer, S. and Lessard, E.J. (2000) Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton. Limnology and Oceanography 45, 569579.Google Scholar
Mikaelyan, A.S., Zatsepin, A.G. and Chasovnikov, V.K. (2013) Long-term changes in nutrient supply of phytoplankton growth in the Black Sea. Journal of Marine Systems 117–118, 5364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millie, D.F., Paerl, H.W., Hurley, J.P. and Kirkpatrick, G.J. (1993) Algal pigment determinations in aquatic ecosystems: analytical evaluations, applications and recommendations. In Menon, J. (ed.) Current topics in botanical research. Trivandrum: Council for Scientific Research Integration , pp. 113.Google Scholar
Moncheva, S., Gotsis-Skretas, O., Pagou, K. and Krastev, A. (2001) Phytoplankton blooms in Black Sea and Mediterranean coastal ecosystems subjected to anthropogenic eutrophication: similarities and differences. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 53, 281295.Google Scholar
Moncheva, S. and Krastev, A. (1997) Some aspects of phytoplankton long-term alterations off Bulgarian Black Sea shelf. In Ozsoy, E. and Mikhaelian, A. (eds) Sensitivity to change: Black Sea, Baltic Sea and North Sea. NATO ASI Series, 2. Environment, Volume 27. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 7994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, A., Sathyendranath, S., Platt, T., Morales, J., Stuart, V., Forge, M.H., Devred, E. and Bouman, H. (2008) Remote sensing of phytoplankton functional types. Remote Sensing of Environment 112, 33663375.Google Scholar
Oguz, T. (2005) Long-term impacts of anthropogenic forcing on the Black Sea Ecosystem. Oceanography 18, 122133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oguz, T., Latun, V.S., Latif, M.A., Vladimirov, V.V., Sur, H.I., Markov, A.A., Ozsoy, E., Kotovshchikov, V.V., Eremeev, V.V. and Unluata, U. (1993) Circulation in the surface and intermediate layers of the Black Sea. Deep-Sea Research 40, 15971612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozsoy, E. and Unluata, U. (1997) Oceanography of the Black Sea: a review of some recent results. Earth-Science Reviews 42, 231272.Google Scholar
Parsons, T.R., Maita, Y. and Lalli, C. (1984) Manual of chemical and biological methods for sea water analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Perez, V., Fernandez, E., Maranon, E., Moran, X.A.G. and Zubkov, M.V. (2006) Vertical distribution of phytoplankton biomass, production and growth in the Atlantic subtropical gyres. Deep-Sea Research I 53, 16161634.Google Scholar
Rampi, L. and Bernard, M. (1978) Key for the determination of Mediterranean pelagic diatoms. Roma: Comitato Nazionale per l'Energia Nucleare.Google Scholar
Ras, J., Claustre, H. and Uitz, J. (2008) Spatial variability of phytoplankton pigment distributions in the Subtropical South Pacific Ocean: comparison between in situ and predicted data. Biogeosciences 5, 353369.Google Scholar
Riegman, R. and Kraay, G.W. (2001) Phytoplankton community structure derived from HPLC analysis of pigments in the Faroe–Shetland channel during summer 1999: the distribution of taxonomic groups in relation to physical/chemical conditions in the photic zone. Journal of Plankton Research 23, 191205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlüter, L., Mohlenberg, F., Havskum, H. and Larsen, S. (2000) The use of phytoplankton pigments for identifying and quantifying phytoplankton groups in coastal areas: testing the influence of light and nutrients on pigment/chlorophyll a ratios. Marine Ecology Progress Series 192, 4963.Google Scholar
Sorokin, Yu.I. (1983) The Black Sea. In Ketchum, P.H. (ed.) Estuaries and enclosed seas . Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 253291.Google Scholar
Sur, H.I., Ozsoy, E., Ilyin, Y.P. and Unluata, U. (1996) Coastal/deep ocean interactions in the Black Sea and their ecological/environmental impacts. Journal of Marine Systems 7, 293320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S.C., Sweeney, C., Poisson, A., Metzl, N., Tilbrook, B., Bates, N., Wanninkhof, R., Feely, R.A., Sabine, C., Olafsson, J. and Nojiri, Y. (2002) Global sea–air CO2 flux based on climatological surface ocean pCO(2), and seasonal biological and temperature effects. Deep-Sea Research Part II—Topical Studies in Oceanography 49, 16011622.Google Scholar
Tomas, C.R. (1996) Identification marine diatoms and dinoflagellates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Utermöhl, H. (1958) Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen phytoplankton. Methodik Mitteilung Internationale Vereinigung Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 9, 138.Google Scholar
Uysal, Z., Kideys, A.E., Senichkina, L., Georgieva, L., Altukhov, D., Kuzmenko, L., Manjos, L., Mutlu, E. and Eker, E. (1998) Phytoplankton patches formed along the southern Black Sea coast in spring and summer 1996. In Ivanov, L. and Oguz, T. (eds) Ecosystem modelling as a management tool for the Black Sea, Volume 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 151162.Google Scholar
Uysal, Z. and Sur, H.I. (1995) Net phytoplankton discriminating patches along the Southern Black Sea Coast in winter 1990. Oceanoliga Acta 18, 639647.Google Scholar
Vedernikov, V.I. and Demidov, A.B. (1993) Primary production and chlorophyll in the deep regions of the Black Sea. Oceanology 33, 229235.Google Scholar
Vidussi, F., Claustre, H., Manca, B.B., Luchetta, A. and Marty, J.C. (2001) Phytoplankton pigment distribution in relation to upper thermocline circulation in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea during winter. Journal of Geophysical Research 106, 1993919956.Google Scholar
Wright, S.W. and Jeffrey, W. (2006) Pigment markers for phytoplankton production. In Volkman, J.K. (ed.) Marine organic matter: biomarkers, isotopes and DNA. Berlin: Spriner-Verlag, pp. 71104.Google Scholar
Wright, S.W., Thomas, D.P., Marchant, H.J., Higgins, H.W., Mackey, M.D. and Mackey, D.J. (1996) Analysis of phytoplankton of the Australian sector of the Southern Ocean: comparisons of microscopy and size frequency data with interpretations of pigment HPLC data using the ‘CHEMTAX’ matrix factorisation program. Marine Ecology Progress Series 144, 285298.Google Scholar
Yayla, M., Yilmaz, A. and Morkoc, E. (2001) The dynamics of nutrient enrichment and primary production related to recent changes in the ecosystem of the Black Sea. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 4, 3349.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, A., Coban-Yildiz, Y. and Tugrul, S. (2006) Biogeochemical cycling and multilayer production in the Black Sea. Geophysical Research Abstracts 8, 00541.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, A., Tugrul, S., Polat, C., Ediger, D., Coban, Y. and Morkoc, E. (1998) On the production, elemental composition (C, N, P) and distribution of photosynthetic organic matter in the Southern Black Sea. Hydrobiologia 363, 141156.Google Scholar
Yunev, O., Vladimir, A., Basturk, O., Yilmaz, A., Kideys, A.E., Moncheva, S. and Konovalov, S.K. (2002) Long-term variation of surface chlorophyll-a and primary production in the open Black Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 230, 1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaitsev, Yu. P. and Alexandrov, B.G. (1997) Recent man-made changes in the Black Sea ecosystem. In Ozsoy, E. and Mikaelyan, A. (eds) Sensitivity to change: Black Sea, Baltic Sea and North Sea. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing, pp. 2531.Google Scholar
Zaitsev, Yu. P. and Mamaev, V. (1997) Marine biological diversity in the Black Sea: a study of change and decline. New York: United Nations Publications, 208 pp.Google Scholar
Zapata, M., Jeffrey, S.W., Wright, S.W., Rodríguez, F., Garrido, J.L. and Clementson, L. (2004) Photosynthetic pigments in 37 species (65 strains) of Haptophyta: implications for oceanography and chemotaxonomy. Marine Ecology Progress Series 270, 83102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Agirbas Supplementary Material

Appendix 1

Download Agirbas Supplementary Material(File)
File 64.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Agirbas Supplementary Material

Appendix 2

Download Agirbas Supplementary Material(File)
File 15.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Agirbas Supplementary Material

Appendix 3

Download Agirbas Supplementary Material(File)
File 159.7 KB