Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:29:02.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Regeneration of the Siphons of Ciona Intestinalis L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Muriel F. Sutton
Muriel F. Sutton
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Chelsea Polytechnic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Regeneration of the siphons of normal specimens Ciona intestinalis has been found to be completed, in every particular other than that of length, in 4 days.

Removal of the neuroglandular complex retards the regeneration rate.

With the exception of the epidermis and of the basic tunic, the new structures differentiate from haemoblasts.

A tentative synthesis has been made of the information available upon asexual reproduction and regeneration in the Ascidiaceae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , June 1953 , pp. 249 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Azema, M., 1937. Recherches sur le sang et l'excrétion chez les Ascidies. Ann. Inst. Océanogr. Paris, T., 17, pp. 1–150.Google Scholar
Bacq, Z. M. & Florkin, M., 1935. Mise en évidence dans le complexe ‘ganglion nerveux-glande neurale d'une Ascidie (Ciona intestinalis) des principles pharmacologiquement analogues à ceux du lobe postérieur de 1'hypophyse des Vertébrés. Arch, intemat. physiol, T. 4O3 pp. 422–8.Google Scholar
Baker, J. R., 1945. The structure and chemical constitution of the Golgi element. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., Vol. 85, pp 1–71.Google Scholar
Baker, J. R., 1949. Further remarks on the Golgi element. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., Vol. 90, PP. 293–3O7.Google Scholar
Barth, L. G., 1940. The process of regeneration in hydroids. Biol. Rev., Vol. 15, pp. 405–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrill, N. J., 1929. Studies in tunicate development. Part 1. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B, Vol. 218, pp. 37–78.Google Scholar
Berrill, N. J., 1932. Mosaic development of the ascidian egg. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. 8, pp. 381–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrill, N. J. 1935a. Studies in tunicate development. Part III. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, B, Vol. 225, pp. 255–326, 327–79.Google Scholar
Berrill, N. J. 1935b. Cell division and differentiation in asexual and sexual development. Journ. Morph. Philadelphia, Vol. 57, pp. 353–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrill, N. J. 1936. Studies in tunicate development. Part V. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, B, Vol. 226, pp. 43–70.Google Scholar
Berrill, N. J. 1947. The development and growth of Ciona. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 26, pp. 616–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berrill, N. J. 1948a. Structure, tadpole and bud formation in the ascidian Archidistoma. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 27, pp. 380–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrill, N. J. 1948b. The development, morphology and budding of the ascidian Diazona. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 27, pp. 389–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrill, N. J. 1950. The Tunicata. Ray Society Publication, London.Google Scholar
Berrill, N. J. 1951. Regeneration and budding in tunicates. Biol. Rev., Vol. 26, pp. 456–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrill, N. J. & Cohen, A., 1936. Regeneration in Clavelina lepadiformis. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. 13, pp. 352–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, G., 1950. Cytology and Cell Physiology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bracket, J., 1944.Embryologie chimique.. Paris.Google Scholar
Brien, P., 1927. Contribution à l'étude de la blastogenèse des Tuniciers. Bourgeonnement chez Apilidium zostericola (Giard).Arch, biol., T. 35, pp. 155–205.Google Scholar
Brien, P., 1930. Contribution a l'étude de la régénération naturelle et experimentale chez les Clavelinidae. Ann. Soc. zool. Belg., T. 61, pp. 19–112.Google Scholar
Brien, P., 1933. Régéneration thoracique chez Archiascidia neapolitana (Julin). Bull. Biol. France-Beige, T. 67, pp. 100–24.Google Scholar
Brien, P. & Brien-Gavage, E., 1927. Contribution à l'étude de la blastogenese des Tuniciers. III. Bourgeonnement de Clavelina lepadiformis Müller. Rec Inst. Zool. Torley-Rousseau Brwcelles, T. I, Fasc. I, pp. 31–81.Google Scholar
Brien, P. 1928. Contribution à l'étude de la blastogenèse des Tuniciers. IV. Recherches sur le bourgeonnement de Perophora listen (Weigm). Rec. Inst. Zool. Torley-Rousseau Bruxelles, T. I, pp. 123–52.Google Scholar
Ten Cate, , 1928. Contribution à la question de la fonction du système nerveux de Ciona intestinalis. Arch. Neerland Set., Bd. 13, pp. 391–401.Google Scholar
Child, C. M., 1941. Patterns and Problems of Development. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. & Berrill, N. J., 1936. The development of isolated blastomeres of the ascidian egg. Journ. Exp. Zool., Vol. 74, pp. 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, S. M., 1936. Structure and function of the ascidian test. Journ. Morph., Vol. 59, PP. 539–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drach, P., 1948. Traite de Zool., Vol. 11, pp. 738–46. Masson et Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
Fox, H. M., 1924. Note on Kammerer's experiments with Ciona, concerning the inheritance of an acquired character. Journ. Genetics, Vol. 14, pp. 89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garstang, W., 1928. The morphology of the Tunicata and its bearings on the phylogeny of the Chordata. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., Vol. 72, pp. 51–187.Google Scholar
Harant, H. & Vernieres, P., 1933.Tuniciers. Faune.de France, Paris.Google Scholar
Hirsch, G. C., 1939. Form- und Stoffwechsel der Golgi-Körper. Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hirschler, J., 1914. Über die Restitutions and Involutions vorgänge bei operieten. Exemplaren von Ciona intestinalis. Archiv.-mikr-Anat. Bonn., Bd. 85, pp. 205–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, J. S., 1926. Studies in dedifferentiation. VI. Reduction phenomena in Clavelina lepadiformis. Pubb. Staz. zool. Napoli, Vol. 7, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Kammerer, P., 1923. Experiments on Ciona and Alytes. Nature, Vol. 112, pp. 826–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selys-Longchamps, M. DE, 1916. Sur le burgeonnement des Polystyelines. Stolonica et Heterocarpa. Bull. Sci. France-Belgique, T. 50, pp. 170–276.Google Scholar
Pérès, J. M., 1943. Recherches sur le sang et les organes nerveux des Tuniciers. Ann. Inst. Océanogr. Paris, T. 21, pp. 229–359.Google Scholar
Pérès, J. M., 1947a. Recherches sur le sang et la tunique commune des Ascidies composées. Ann. Inst. Océanogr. Paris, T. 23, pp. 345–473.Google Scholar
Pérès, J. M., 1947b. Remarques sur le complexe neuroglandulaire de Ciona intestinalis et les propriétés de ses extraits. Bull. Lab. Marit. Dinard, T. 29, pp. 29–34.Google Scholar
Pérès, J. M., 1947c. Interdépendance du sang, du mesenchyme et de la tunique chez les Ascidies. Bull. Mus. Hist. nat. Marseille, T.7 (2–3), pp. 83–90.Google Scholar
Pérès, J. M., 1948a. Recherches sur la genèse et la régénération de la tunique chez Ciona intestinalis L. Bull. Inst. Oceanogr. Monaco, No. 936, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Pérès, J. M.., 1948b. Recherches sur la genèse et la régénération de la tunique chez Clavelina lepadiformis Müller. Arch. Anat. Micr. Morph. exp., 3, pp. 230–60.Google Scholar
Rose, S. M., 1939. Embryonic induction in the Ascidia. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. 77, pp. 216–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, L. S., 1899. Die Regeneration des Ganglions von Ciona intestinalis. Jena Zeitschr. Naturw., Bd. 33, pp. 263–344.Google Scholar
Spemann, H., 1938. Embryonic Development and Induction. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, D. A., 1939. Observations on the blood of certain ascidians with special reference to the biochemistry of vanadium. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. 16, pp. 499–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B., 1942. The significance of chromatic droplets in the growth of insects. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., Vol. 83, pp. 141–52.Google Scholar