Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-16T19:02:04.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial Variation in an Algal Turf Community with Respect to Substratum Slope and Wave Height

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J.S. Whorff ,
L.L. Whorff  and
M.H. Sweet
J.S. Whorff
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843–3258, USA
L.L. Whorff
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843–3258, USA
M.H. Sweet
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843–3258, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A mid-shore colonial algal turf community is described. Samples were analysed to determine if species composition, invertebrate epiphyte density, algal mat biomass, and the amount of sediment trapped among algal thalli differed with respect to substratum slope and wave height.

Colonial algal turf was approximately 1–3 cm in height and predominantly composed of a mixture of four species of eurythermal red algae, including Gelidium crinale (Turner) Lamouroux (Rhodophyceae: Gelidiales), Centroceras clavulatum (C. Agardh) Montagne, Polysiphonia denudata (Dillwyn) Kuetzing, and Bryocladia cuspidata (J. Agardh) De Toni (Rhodophyceae: Ceramiales). More delicate algae and algal epiphytes were found at stations with lower mean wave height, while non-epiphytic coralline algae were found only at stations with higher mean wave height. Algal mat mass was significantly greater on horizontal slopes than on vertical slopes, but did not differ with respect to wave-height levels. Algal mats trapped significantly more sediment on horizontal slopes with lower mean wave height.

Densities of the three most abundant invertebrate epiphytes appeared to be related to sediment deposition. Like sedimentation patterns, disparities in population densities on different substratum slopes increased with lower mean wave height. The highest densities of the amphipods Elasmopus rapax Costa and Hyale frequens Haswell (Crustacea: Peracarida) occurred on horizontal slopes at stations with significantly lower mean wave height. The highest densities of the tree oyster Isognomon bicolor C.B. Adams (Mollusca: Pterioida) were on vertical slopes at stations with significantly lower mean wave height. Barnacle epiphytes occurred in higher densities at stations receiving greater mean wave height, while dominant species of other crustaceans and molluscs had higher densities at stations with significantly lower mean wave height.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , May 1995 , pp. 429 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ballantine, W.J., 1961. A biologically-defined exposure scale for the comparative description of rocky shores. Field Studies, 1(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
Britton, J.C. & Morton, B., 1989. Shore ecology of the Gulf of Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Collier, A. & Hedgpeth, J.W., 1950. An introduction to the hydrography of tidal waters of Texas. Publications of the Institute of Marine Science, University of Texas, 1(2), 125–194.Google Scholar
Copeland, B.J. & Truitt, M.V., 1966. Fauna of the Aransas Pass Inlet, Texas. II. Penaeid shrimp postlarvae. Texas Journal of Science, 18, 65–74.Google Scholar
Crisp, D.J. & Southward, A.J., 1958. The distribution of intertidal organisms along the coasts of the English Channel. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 157–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, C.A., 1991. Infaunal polychaetes of a rocky intertidal surfgrass bed in southern California. Bulletin of Marine Science, 48, 386–394.Google Scholar
Denny, M.W., 1988. Biology and the mechanics of the wave-swept environment. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J.E. & Hay, M.E., 1990. Seaweed adaptations to herbivory: chemical, structural, and morphological defences are often adjusted to spatial or temporal patterns of attack. BioScience, 40, 368–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, P., 1970. Illustrated guide to the seaweeds and sea grasses in the vicinity of Port Aransas, Texas. Contributions in Marine Science. University of Texas, 15, supplement, 1–128.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. & Kapraun, D.F., 1973. Benthic marine algal ecology in the Port Aransas, Texas area. Contributions in Marine Science. University of Texas, 17, 15–52.Google Scholar
Foster, M.S., De Vogelaere, A.P., Harrold, C., Pearse, J.S. & Thum, A.B., 1988. Causes of spatial and temporal patterns in rocky intertidal communities of central and northern California. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences, 9, 1—45.Google Scholar
Grahame, J. & Hanna, F.S., 1989. Factors affecting the distribution of the epiphytic fauna of Corallina officinalis (L.) on an exposed rocky shore. Ophelia, 30, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Me., 1981. The functional morphology of turf-forming seaweeds: persistence in stressful marine habitats. Ecology, 62, 739–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedgpeth, J.W., 1953. An introduction to the zoogeography of the northwestern Gulf of Mexico with reference to the invertebrate fauna. Publications of the Institute of Marine Science, University of Texas, 3(1), 107–224.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, S.H., 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54, 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapraun, D.F., 1980. Summer aspect of algal zonation on a Texas jetty in relation to wave exposure. Contributions in Marine Science. University of Texas, 23, 101–109.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, J.M., 1962. The effect of waves on the composition of a population of attached marine algae. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 89, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.R., 1964. The ecology of rocky shores. London: English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Littler, M.M. & Littler, D.S., 1980. The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies in benthic marine macroalgae: field and laboratory tests of a functional form model. American Naturalist, 116, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubchenco, J. & Menge, B.A., 1978. Community development and persistence in a low rocky intertidal zone. Ecological Monographs, 48, 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, L.D., 1977. Theorigin and distribution of shallow water gammaridean Amphipoda in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea with notes on their ecology. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, USA.Google Scholar
Nowell, A.R.M. & Jumars, P.A., 1984. How environments of aquatic benthos. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogle, J.T., Heard, R.W. & Sieg, J., 1982. Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) of the Gulf of Mexico. I. Introduction and an annotated bibliography of Tanaidacea previously reported from the Gulf of Mexico. Gulf Research Reports, 7, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, R.C., 1975. The effects of sewage discharge on intertidal polychaetous annelid assemblages at San Clemente Island. MSc thesis, California State University, USA.Google Scholar
Royce, C.F., 1970. An introduction to sediment analysis. Tempe Arizona: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Russo, A.R., 1991. Do predatory fish affect the structure of an epiphytal amphipod assemblage on a protected algal reef in Hawaii? Hydrobiologia, 224, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K.P. & Johnson, A.S., 1991. Effects of water movement on prey capture and distribution of reef corals. Hydrobiologia, 226, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southward, A.J., 1991. Forty years of changes in species composition and population density of barnacles on a rocky shore near Plymouth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, T.A. & Stephenson, A., 1972. Life between tidemarks on rocky shores. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Stewart, J.G., 1983. Fluctuations in the quantity of sediments trapped among algal thalli on intertidal rock platforms in southern California. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 73, 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J., 1981. Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review. London, 19, 513–605.Google Scholar
Wentworth, C.K., 1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. Journal of Geology, 30,377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, H.L., Rosene, H.F. & Hedgpeth, J.W., 1950. The invertebrate fauna of Texas coast jetties; a preliminary survey. Publications of the Institute of Marine Science, University of Texas, 1(2), 53–88.Google Scholar
Whorff, J.S., 1992. Physical and biological interactions in the midlittoral zone along a central Texas inlet. PhD thesis, Texas A&M University, USA.Google Scholar