Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:42:52.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on Ligia oceanica. Part II. The Processes of Feeding, Digestion and Absorption, with a Description of the Structure of the Foregut

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Aubrey G. Nicholls
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Ligia is an omnivore, though normally feeding on Fucus. Portions of food are cut off by the mandibles and passed into the œsophagus. Its feeding period is limited.

2. The foregut is provided with a number of ampullæ and lamellæ which are furnished with spines and bristles and are so arranged as to form a filter for the separation of the liquid portion of the food from the solid particles.

3. A second filter is found in the floor of the foregut protecting the entrance to the hepato-pancreas.

4. A ventral valve is present preventing the entry into the hepato-pancreas of solid food from the intestine.

5. The hepato-pancreas consists of three pairs of tubules provided with a muscular network for producing contractions. The epithelium possesses discrete cells.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , October 1931 , pp. 675 - 706
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnard, K. H. 1924. The Digestive Canal of Isopod Crustaceans. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Afr., XII, pp. 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelderd, C. 1906. Research on the Digestive System of the Schizopoda La Cellule, XXV, pp. 7–70.Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. G. 1907. Ligia. L.M.B.C. Memoirs, XIV, pp. 37.Google Scholar
Huet, L. 1883. Nouvelles recherches sur les Crustacés Isopodes. Jour, de l'Anat. et de la Physiol., 19, pp. 241–376.Google Scholar
Ide, M. 1892. Le tube digestif des Edriophthalmes. La Cellule, VIII, pp. 99–204.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. G. 1926. The Morphology of the Isopod Head. Part 1. The Head of Ligia oceanica. Proc. Zoo. Soc., pp. 885–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, H. 1904. Beiträge zur vergleichende Physiologie der Verdauung. Part IV. Die Verdauung und der Verdauungsapparab des Flusskrebses. Arch. ges. Physiol., 101, pp. 263–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, H. 1909. Die Phylogenie der Filtervorrichtungen im Pylorusmagen der Malacostraca. Verh. d. Deutsch Zool. Ges.Google Scholar
Lloyd, R. E. 1908. The Internal Anatomy of Bathynomus giganteus, with a Description of the Sexually Mature Forms. Mem. Ind. Mus., I, pp. 81–102.Google Scholar
MacLean, . 1919. Biochem. Jour. XIII, p. 133.Google Scholar
McMurrich, J. P. 1896. The Epithelium of the so-called Midgut of the Terrestrial Isopods. Jour. of Morph., 14, pp. 83–108.Google Scholar
Murlin, J. R. 1902. Absorption and Secretion in the Digestive System of the Land Isopods. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Philad., LIV, pp. 284–359.Google Scholar
Norman, J. R. 1923. Methods and Technique of Reconstruction. Jour. Roy. Micr. Soc., pp. 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nusbaum-Hilarowicz, J. 1917. Studien über die Physiologie der Verdauung bei den Landasseln (Isopoda). Biol. Centr., XXXVII, pp. 49–55.Google Scholar
Nusbaum-Hilarowicz, J. 1920. Zur Histologie und Physiologie der Verdauungsorgane der Landasseln, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Kenntnisder Resorptionsvorgänge im Tierreich. Bull. l'Acad. Polon. Sc. et Lett., pp. 67–117.Google Scholar
Patrick, D. M. 1926. An Experimental Study of the Cells of the Hepato-pancreas of Ligia. Brit. Jour. Exp. Biol., IV, pp. 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pump, W. 1914. Über die Muskelnetze der Mitteldarmdrüse von Crustaceen. Arch. f. Mikr. Anat., 85, pp. 167–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehorst, G. 1914. Der Filtermagen von Asellus aquaticus. Zool. Anz., 44, pp. 228–234.Google Scholar
Rosenstadt, B. 1888. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Organisation von Asellus aquaticus. Biol. Centr., VIII, pp. 452–462.Google Scholar
Sanford, E. W. 1918. Experiments on the Physiology of Digestion in the Blattidæ. Jour. Exp. Zool., 25, pp. 355–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sars, G. O. 1867. Histoire naturelle des Crustacés d'eau douce de Norvege, p. 146.Google Scholar
Schonichen, W. 1898. Der Darmkanal der Onisciden und Aselliden Zeit. f. wiss. Zool., LXV, pp. 143–178.Google Scholar
Shinoda, O. 1928. Über die Eiweisslösenden Enzyme im Magensafte von Astacus. Zeit. verg. Phys., VII, pp. 323–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. W. 1909. The Fresh Water Crustacea of Tasmania. Trans. Linn. Soc., Ser. 2, Zool. II, XI, pp. 61–92.Google Scholar
Steudel, A. 1912. Absorption und Secretion in Darm von Insecten. Zool. Jahr. Anat., 33, pp. 165–224.Google Scholar
Tait, J. 1917. Experiments and Observations on Crustacea. Part IV. Some Structural Features Pertaining to Glyptonotus. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., XXXVII, pp. 246–303.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1880. Über den Bau und die Tätigkeit der sogennanten Leber der Crustaceen. Arch. f. Mikr. Anat., 17, pp. 385–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. 1927. Digestion in the Cockroach. I and II. Biochem. Jour., XXI, pp. 791–811.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. 1928. Digestion in the Cockroach. III. Biochem. Journ., XXII, pp. 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. W. 1907. The Stomach of the Lobster and the Food of Larval Lobsters. 37th Ann. Rep. Comm. Inland Fisheries. Rhode Island, pp. 153–180.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1924. Studies in the Comparative Physiology of Digestion. II. Mechanism of Feeding, Digestion and Assimilation in Nephrops norvegicus. Brit. Jour. Exp. Biol., I, pp. 343–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1926a. Structure and Physiology of the Organs of Feeding and Digestion in Ostrea edulis. Jour. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., XIV, pp. 295–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1926b. The Digestive Diverticula in the Lamellibranchs. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., LIV, pp. 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1927. The Absence of a Cellulase in Limnoria. Nature, Lond., 119, p. 855.Google Scholar