Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:55:22.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Amphinomidæ, Aphroditidæ, Polynoidæ, and Sigalionidæ of Plymouth and the English Channel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

T. V. Hodgson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Having attempted to investigate the Polychæte fauna of the Plymouth district during those favourable opportunities which have occurred during the past three years, I now put upon record some few notes respecting a small section of this interesting but extremely perplexing group.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , November 1900 , pp. 218 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1900

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, .—On the Fauna and Bottom-deposits near the Thirty-fathom Line from the Eddystone Grounds to Start Point. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, vol. v. 1899.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, Audouin et.—Memoir pour servir à l'Histoire Naturelle de la France. Vol. ii. Annélides. Paris. 1834.Google Scholar
Benham, W. B.—Archiannelida, Polychæta, and Myzostomaria. Camb. Nat. Hist. vol. ii. 1896.Google Scholar
Bourne, A. G.—On certain points in the Anatomy of the Polynoina and on the Polynoë (Lepidonotus, Leach) clava of Montagu. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., ser. 2, Zool., vol. ii. 1883.Google Scholar
Carus, V.—Prodromus Faunæ Mediterraneæ. Stuttgart. 1885.Google Scholar
Claparède, E.—Les Annelides Chétopodes du Golfe du Naples. Genè et Bale. 1868.Google Scholar
Committee for the Exploration of the Marine Fauna of South Devon, Reports. Reports Brit. Assoc. 1865, 1867, 1869, 1872. Committee for Exploring the Marine Zoology of South Devon, Reports. Reports Brit. Assoc. 1879–80.Google Scholar
Darboux, J. G.—Recherches sur les Aphroditiens. Memoire 6. Trav. Inst. Zool. Univ. Montpellier et de la Stat. Marit de Cette. Lille. 1899.Google Scholar
Giard, A.—Sur quelques Polynoidiens. Bull. Scient. du Dep. du Nord, ser. 2, vol. ix. 1886.Google Scholar
Gosse, P.H.—A Naturalist's Rambles on the Devonshire Coast. London. 1853.Google Scholar
Grube, E.—Actinien EchMBIdermen und Wurmer des Mittelmeeres. Königsberg. 1840.Google Scholar
Grube, E.—Bemerkungen über die familie der Aphroditeen. Jahresb. der Schles. gesells. Breslau. 1875.Google Scholar
Grube, E.—Mittheilungen über St. Vaast-la-Hougue und seine Meeres-, besonders seine Annelidenfauna. Jahresb. schles. Gesellschaft für Vat. Cult. Breslau. 1869–1872.Google Scholar
Hornell, J.—Report on the Polychætous Annelids of the L.M.B.C. District. Proc. & Trans. L'pool. Biol. Soc., vol. v. 1890–1.Google Scholar
Johnston, G.—A Catalogue of the British Non-parasitical Worms in the Collection of the British Museum. London. 1865.Google Scholar
Lankester, E. Ray.—On some New British Polynoina. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., vol. xxv. 1866.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W. C.—A Monograph of the British Annelids. Part II. Polychæta, AmphMBImidæ to Sigalionidæ. Ray Society, London. 1900.Google Scholar
Malaquin, A.—Annélides Polychètes des côtes du Boulonnais. Revue Biol. du Nord de la France. Tome ii. 1889–1890.Google Scholar
Malmgren, A. J.—Nordiska Hafs Annulater. Öfvers. K. vet. Akad. Forhand. Stockholm. 1865.Google Scholar
Malmgren, A. J.—Annulata Polychæta Spitsbergiæ, Grönlandiæ, Islandiæ et Scandinaviæ hactenus cognita. Öfvers. K. vet. Akad. Forhand. Stockholm. 1867.Google Scholar
Marenzeller, E. von.—Sudjapanische Anneliden. Math. Naturviss Akad. Wien. 1879.Google Scholar
Marenzeller, E. von—Zur Kenntniss der Adriatischen Anneliden. Sitzb. der K.K. Akad. zu wiss. zu Wien. 1874.Google Scholar
Möbius, K.—Die wirbellosen Thiere der Ostsee. Jahresbericht der Comm. z. wiss. Untersuchung der deutschen Meere, für 1871. Berlin. 1873.Google Scholar
Möbius, K.—Vermes. Jahresbericht der Comm. z. wiss. Untersuch. der deutschen Meere. Berlin. 1875.Google Scholar
Parfitt, E.—A Catalogue of the Annelides of Devonshire, with Notes and Observations. Trans. Devon Assoc., vol. ii. 1867.Google Scholar
Pruvot, G.—Essai sur les Fonds et la Faune de la Manche Occidentale (Côtes de Bretagne) comparés a ceux du Golfe du Lion. Arch. Zool. Expér et Gen., ser. 3, vol. v. 1897.Google Scholar
Pruvot, G., and Racovitza, E. G..—Materiaux pour la Faune des Annélides de Banyuls. Arch. Zool. Expér et Gen., ser. 3, vol. iii. 1895.Google Scholar
Joseph, St., de.—Annélides Polychètes des côtes de Dinard. Parts II. and IV. Ann. des Sci. Nat., ser. 7, vols. v. and xx. 1888, 1895.Google Scholar
Joseph, St.—Les Annélides Polychætes des côtes de France. Ann. Sci. Nat., ser. 8, vol. v. 1898.Google Scholar
Joseph, St..—Les Annelides Polychætes de la Rade de Brest et de Paimpol. Ann. Sci. Nat., ser. 8, vol. x. 1899.Google Scholar