Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:41:36.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bottlenose dolphins using coastal regions adjacent to a Special Area of Conservation in north-east Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2008

Ross M. Culloch  and
Kevin P. Robinson
Ross M. Culloch*
Affiliation:
Cetacean Research and Rescue Unit (CRRU), PO Box 11307, Banff, AB45 3WB, Scotland, UK School of Biological Sciences, The University of Wales, Bangor, LL57 2UW, Wales, UK
Kevin P. Robinson
Affiliation:
Cetacean Research and Rescue Unit (CRRU), PO Box 11307, Banff, AB45 3WB, Scotland, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Ross M. Culloch, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DHI 3LE, UK email: ross.culloch@durham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a four year study of bottlenose dolphins along the southern shore of the outer Moray Firth we show that whilst dolphins were encountered along the majority of the survey area, there was a significant preference to the western section, which is the area directly adjacent to the current Special Area of Conservation (SAC). We also show that 80% of all groups encountered (N = 62) included calves, and that neonates were seen throughout the months of July, August, September and October. The mark–recapture abundance estimates for the southern outer Moray Firth were variable, with a highest annual estimate of 108 (95% CI = 79–129), which is similar to previous estimates for the number of animals using the entire Moray Firth. In contrast, the lowest annual estimate of 61 (95% CI = 48–74) suggests that not all individuals regularly use the entire geographical range of the population and that individual ranging patterns may vary across years. The findings of this study indicate that the southern outer Moray Firth is an important area for this population and that it should not simply be considered as a corridor to other areas of more importance. For this reason, we believe that further consideration of the current management of this population in areas outside the existing SAC is necessary.

Keywords

conservationmanagementmark–recaptureabundancephoto-identificationcetaceanTursiops truncatus
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Special Issue 6: Marine Mammals , September 2008 , pp. 1237 - 1243
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bristow, T., Glanville, N. and Hopkins, J. (2001) Shore-based monitoring of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) by trained volunteers in Cardigan Bay, Wales. Aquatic Mammals 27, 115–120.Google Scholar
Bristow, T. and Rees, E.I.S. (2001) Site fidelity and behaviour of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Cardigan Bay, Wales. Aquatic Mammals 27, 1–10.Google Scholar
Chao, A., Lee, S.M. and Jeng, S.L. (1992) Estimating population size for capture–recapture data when capture probabilities vary by time and individual animal. Biometrics 48, 201–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora of 21 May (2004) Consolidated text produced by the CONSLEG system of the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, CONSLEG 1992L0043–01/05/2004, 57 pp.Google Scholar
Durban, J.W., Elston, D.A., Ellifrit, D.K., Dickson, E., Hammond, P.S. and Thompson, P.M. (2005) Multi-state mark–recapture for cetaceans: population estimates with Bayesian model averaging. Marine Mammal Science 21, 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grellier, K. and Wilson, B. (2003) Bottlenose dolphins using the Sound of Barra, Scotland. Aquatic Mammals 29, 378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnlaugsson, T. and Sigurjónsson, J. (1990) A note on the problem of false positives in the use of natural marking data and abundance estimation. In Hammond, P.S. et al. (eds) Individual recognition of cetaceans: use of photo-identification and other techniques to estimate population parameters. Report of the International Whaling Commission (Special Issue) 12, pp. 143–145.Google Scholar
Harding-Hill, R. (1993) The Moray Firth review. Scottish Natural Heritage, north-west region, Scotland. 257 pp.Google Scholar
Hastie, G.D., Barton, T.R., Grellier, K., Hammond, P.S., Swift, R.J., Thompson, P.M. and Wilson, B. (2003a) Distribution of small cetaceans within a candidate Special Area of Conservation; implications for management. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 5, 261–266.Google Scholar
Hastie, G.D., Wilson, B. and Thompson, P.M. (2003b) Fine-scale selection by coastal bottlenose dolphins: application of a new land-based video-montage technique. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81, 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, G.D., Wilson, B., Wilson, L.J., Parsons, K.M. and Thompson, P.M. (2004) Functional mechanisms underlying cetacean distribution patterns: hotspots for bottlenose dolphins are linked to foraging. Marine Biology 144, 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, S.N. and Rogan, E. (2002) Identifying critical areas and habitat preferences of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Marine Ecology Progress Series 244, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockyer, C.H. and Morris, R.J. (1986) The history and behaviour of a wild, sociable dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) off the north coast of Cornwall. Aquatic Mammals 12, 3–12.Google Scholar
Mann, J., Connor, R.C., Barre, L.M. and Heithaus, M.R. (2000) Female reproductive success in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.): life history, habitat, provisioning, and group size effects. Behavioural Ecology 11, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, S., Turrell, W., Lütkebohle, T. and Thompson, P.M. (2002) Influence of the tidal cycle and a tidal intrusion front on the spatio-temporal distribution of coastal bottlenose dolphins. Marine Ecology Progress Series 239, 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, K.M., Noble, L.R., Reid, R.J. and Thompson, P.M. (2002) Mitochondrial genetic diversity and population structuring of UK bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): is the NE Scotland population demographically and geographically isolated? Biological Conservation 108, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, A.J., Urian, K.W., Wilson, B. and Waples, D.M. (2003) Abundance of bottlenose dolphins in the bays, sounds, and estuaries of North Carolina. Marine Mammal Science 19, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, K.P., Baumgartner, N., Eisfeld, S.M., Clark, N.M., Culloch, R.M., Haskins, G.N., Zapponi, L., Whaley, A.R., Weare, J.S. and Tetley, M.J. (2007) The summer distribution and occurrence of cetaceans in the coastal waters of the outer southern Moray Firth in northeast Scotland (UK). Lutra 50, 19–30.Google Scholar
Santos, M.B., Pierce, G.J., Reid, R.J., Patterson, I.A.P., Ross, H.M. and Mente, E. (2001) Stomach contents of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Scottish waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 873–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, H.S., Wells, R.S. and Würsig, B. (1986) Ecology, behaviour and social organisation of the bottlenose dolphin: a review. Marine Mammal Science 2, 34–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S.H. (1990) Behaviour and ecology of the bottlenose dolphin at Sanibel Island, Florida. In Leatherwood, S. and Reeves, R.R. (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevick, P.T., Palsbøll, P.J., Smith, T.D., Bravington, M.V. and Hammond, P.S. (2001) Errors in identification using natural markings: rates, sources, and effects on capture–recapture estimates of abundance. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture Science 58, 1861–1870.Google Scholar
Stockin, K.A., Weir, C.R. and Pierce, G.J. (2006) Examining the importance of Aberdeenshire (UK) coastal waters for North Sea bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 86, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P.M., White, S. and Dickson, E. (2004) Presence of bottlenose dolphins reduces the probability of sighting harbour porpoises. Marine Mammal Science 20, 322–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.A., Dawson, S.M. and Slooten, E. (1993) The abundance and distribution of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71, 2080–2088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. (1995) The ecology of the bottlenose dolphins in the Moray Firth, Scotland: a population at the northern extreme of the species' range. PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.Google Scholar
Wilson, B., Grellier, K., Hammond, P.S., Brown, G. and Thompson, P.M. (2000) Changing occurrence of epidermal lesions in wild bottlenose dolphins. Marine Ecology Progress Series 205, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B., Hammond, P.S. and Thompson, P.M. (1999) Estimating size and assessing trends in a coastal bottlenose dolphin population. Ecological Applications 9, 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B., Reid, R.J., Grellier, K., Thompson, PM. and Hammond, P.S. (2004) Considering the temporal when managing the spatial: a population range expansion impacts protected areas-based management for bottlenose dolphins. Animal Conservation 7, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B., Thompson, P.M. and Hammond, P.S. (1997) Habitat use by bottlenose dolphins: seasonal distribution and stratified movement patterns in the Moray Firth, Scotland. Journal of Applied Ecology 34, 1365–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, C.J. (1998) Movements of bottlenose dolphins around the south-west coast of Britain. Journal of Zoology 246, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar