Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:04:14.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The colonization of macroalgal rafts by the genus Idotea (sub-phylum Crustacea; order Isopoda): an active or passive process?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2012

Emmett Clarkin ,
Christine A. Maggs ,
Gareth Arnott ,
Sean Briggs  and
Jonathan D.R. Houghton
Emmett Clarkin*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK Queen's University Belfast Marine Laboratory, 12–13 The Strand, Portaferry, County Down, BT22 1PF, UK
Christine A. Maggs
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK Queen's University Belfast Marine Laboratory, 12–13 The Strand, Portaferry, County Down, BT22 1PF, UK
Gareth Arnott
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
Sean Briggs
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
Jonathan D.R. Houghton
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK Queen's University Belfast Marine Laboratory, 12–13 The Strand, Portaferry, County Down, BT22 1PF, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: E. Clarkin, School of Biological Sciences Queen's, University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK email: pclarkin01@qub.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The association of invertebrate communities with macroalgae rafts has received much attention over recent decades, yet significant gaps in our knowledge remain with respect to the colonization process. Using laboratory-based experiments and in situ field trials in Strangford Lough, Northern Ireland, this study investigated whether members of the known rafting genus Idotea (sub-phylum Crustacea; order Isopoda) could effectively colonize rafts after shore seaweed detachment, or if their presence merely reflected a passive marooning process. Test tank arenas were used to identify traits that may influence the rafting potential of the dominant shore species Idotea granulosa and the well known rafter Idotea baltica. When released mid-water, I. granulosa initially ascended and associated with floating seaweed whereas I. baltica tended to descend with no clear habitat association. These findings conflict with the differential distribution of these Idotea species among rafts and shore algae, thus highlighting the complex nature of the potential of organisms to raft. In the field we considered the relative ability of different Idotea species to colonize tethered rafts composed of Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus, cleaned of all vagile organisms and deployed at locations adjacent to established intertidal Idotea species populations. At the end of the experiment (after 44 days) rafts were inhabited by known rafting and shoreline species, confirming that colonization can occur after algal detachment. Previously considered shoreline species on occasion outnumbered well known rafters suggesting that a wide range of Idotea species can readily avail of macroalgal rafts as a potential dispersal mechanism or alternative habitat.

Keywords

orientationraftingdispersalIdotea balticaIdotea granulosacolonization
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 92 , Issue 6 , September 2012 , pp. 1273 - 1282
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abelló, O. and Frankland, J. (1997) Population characteristics of the neustonic isopod Idotea metallica (Crustacea, Isopoda, Idoteidae) in the western Mediterranean (June 1993). Scientia Marina 61, 409–414.Google Scholar
Anderson, T.W. and Darling, D.A. (1952) Asymptotic theory of certain ‘goodness-of-fit’ criteria based on stochastic processes. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R.A. and Bell, S.S. (2001) Colonization of dynamic substrate: factors influencing recruitment of the wood-boring isopod, Sphaeroma terebrans, onto red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) prop roots. Oecologia 127, 522–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. (1990) Strangford Lough. The wildlife of an Irish Sea lough. Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Cronin, G. and Hay, M.E. (1996) Susceptibility to herbivores depends on recent history of both the plant and animal. Ecology 77, 1531–1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, T.W. and Sashar, N. (2001) The linearly polarized light field in clear, tropical marine waters: spatial and temporal variation of light intensity, degree of polarization and e-vector angle. Journal of Experimental Biology 204, 2461–2467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, J. and Rees, E.I.S. (1993) Observations on neuston and floating weed patches in the Irish Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 36, 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, T.M., Rumrill, S.S. and Shanks, A.L. (2008) Colonization and substratum preference of an introduced burrowing crustacean in a temperate estuary. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 354, 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grave, S. and Holmes, J.M.C. (1998) The distribution of marine Isopoda (Crustacea) in Lough Hyne. Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 98B, 23–30.Google Scholar
Frid, C.L.J. and James, R. (1988) Interactions between two species of the saltmarsh gastropod, Hydrobia ulvae and Littorina littorea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 43, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, H.-D. and Janke, M. (1998) Mechanisms and consequences of intra- and interspecific interference competition in Idotea baltica (Pallas) and Idotea emarginata (Fabricius) (Crustacea: Isopoda): a laboratory study of possible proximate causes of habitat segregation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 227, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, H.-D., Gutow, L. and Janke, M. (2007) Flexible habitat selection and interactive segregation in the marine congeners Idotea baltica and Idotea emarginata (Crustacea, Isopoda). Marine Biology 150, 929–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutow, L. (2003a). Local population persistence as a pre-condition for large-scale dispersal of Idotea metallica (Crustacea, Isopoda) on drifting habitat patches. Hydrobiologia 503, 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutow, L. (2003b) Konkurrenz, Habitatsegregation und Metapopulationseffekte: Perspektiven für Idotea metallica (Crustacea: Isopoda) in der Nordsee. PhD thesis. Free University Berlin.Google Scholar
Gutow, L. and Franke, H-D. (2001) On the current and possible future status of the neustonic isopod Idotea metallica Bosc in the North Sea: a laboratory study. Journal of Sea Research 45, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutow, L. and Franke, H-D. (2003) Metapopulation structure of the marine isopod Idotea metallica, a species associated with drifting habitat patches. Helgoland Marine Research 56, 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutow, L., Strahl, J., Wiencke, C., Franke, H-D. and Saborowski, R. (2006) Behavioural and metabolic adaptations of marine isopods to the rafting life style. Marine Biology 149, 821–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutow, L., Leidenberger, S., Boos, K. and Franke, H.D. (2007) Differential life history responses of two Idotea species (Crustacea: Isopoda) to food limitation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 344, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutow, L., Giménez, L., Boos, K. and Saborowski, R. (2009) Rapid changes in the epifaunal community after detachment of buoyant benthic macroalgae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J. and Ryland, J.S. (2000) Handbook of the marine fauna of north-west Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Healy, B. and O'Neill, M. (1984) The life cycle and population dynamics of Idotea pelagica and I. granulosa (Isopoda: Valvifera) in south-east Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 64, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highsmith, R.C. (1985) Floating and algal rafting as potential dispersal mechanisms in brooding invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 25, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobday, A.J. (2000) Age of drifting Macrocystis pyrifera (L.) C. Agardh rafts in the Southern California Bight. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 253, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, S.L., Winter, L.J. and Scott, G.W. (2001) Habitat heterogeneity, body size and phenotypic diversity in Idotea granulosa (Isopoda) on the north-east coast of England. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 949–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingólfsson, A. (1995) Floating clumps of seaweed around Iceland: natural microcosms and a means of dispersal for shore fauna. Marine Biology 122, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingólfsson, A. (1998) Dynamics of macrofaunal communities of floating seaweed clumps off western Iceland: a study of patches on the surface of the sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 231, 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingólfsson, A. (2000) Colonization of floating seaweed by pelagic and subtidal benthic animals in southwestern Iceland. Hydrobiologia 440, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingólfsson, A. and Agnarsson, I. (2003) Amphipods and isopods in the rocky intertidal: dispersal and movements during high tide. Marine Biology 143, 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, L. and Thiel, M. (2008) Active and passive migration in boring isopods Limnoria spp. (Crustacea, Peracarida) from kelp holdfasts. Journal of Sea Research 60, 176–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papi, F. (1992) Animal homing. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavia, H., Carr, H. and Aberg, P. (1999) Habitat and feeding preferences of crustacean mesoherbivores inhabiting the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. and its epiphytic macroalgae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 236, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomon, M. and Buchholz, F. (2000) Effects of temperature on the respiration rates and the kinetics of citrate synthase in two species of Idotea (Isopoda, Crustacea). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B 125, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salemaa, H. and Ranta, E. (1991) Phenotypic variability of the intertidal isopod Idotea granulosa (Rathke) in the Irish Sea. Crustaceana 61, 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sano, M., Omori, M. and Taniguchi, K. (2003) Predator–prey systems of drifting seaweed communities off the Tohoku coast, northern Japan, as determined by feeding habit analysis of phytal animals. Fisheries Science 69, 260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shacklock, P.F. (2007) Biology of Idotea baltica in Chondrus aquaculture. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 23, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, M. and Gutow, L. (2005) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. II. The rafting organisms and community. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 42, 181–263.Google Scholar
Thiel, M. and Haye, P.A. (2006) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. III. Biogeographical and evolutionary consequences. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 44, 323–429.Google Scholar
Tully, O. and Ó Céidigh, P. (1986) The ecology of Idotea species (Isopoda) and Gammarus locusta (Amphipoda) on surface drift-weed in Galway Bay (west of Ireland). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 66, 931–942.Google Scholar
Tuomi, J., Jormalainen, V. and Ilvessalo, H. (1988) Growth, food consumption and reproductive tactics of the aquatic isopod Idotea baltica. Annales Zoologici Fennici 25, 145–151.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1997) Experiments in ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vandendriessche, S., Vincx, M. and Degraer, S. (2006) Floating seaweed in the neustonic environment: a case study from Belgian coastal waters. Journal of Sea Research 55, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandendriessche, S., Vincx, M. and Degraer, S. (2007) Floating seaweed and the influences of temperature, grazing and clump size on raft longevity—a microcosm study. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 343, 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, R.A.H., Franke, H.D. and Buchholz, F. (1999) Habitat-related differences in the responses to oxygen deficiencies in the Idotea baltica and Idotea emarginata (Isopoda, Crustacea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 239, 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viejo, R.M. (1999) Mobile epifauna inhabiting the invasive Sargassum muticum and two local seaweeds in northern Spain. Aquatic Botany 64, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viejo, R.M. and Aberg, P. (2003) Temporal and spatial variation in the density of mobile epifauna and grazing damage on the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum. Marine Biology 142, 1229–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wares, J.P. (2001) Intraspecific variation and geographic isolation in Idotea baltica (Isopoda: Valvifera). Journal of Crustacean Biology 21, 1007–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar