Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:37:46.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A correction to the Poole and Atkins Secchi disc/light-attenuation formula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Terriss A. Walker
Terriss A. Walker
Affiliation:
Botany Department, James CookUniversity of North Queensland, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Re-examination of the original and subsequent data from Secchi disc studies leads to a revised constant in the light attenuation formula applicable to general field-work.

In theory, the depth at which a Secchi disc disappears from an observer's sight, Ds, is inversely proportional to the sum of attenuation coefficients for diffuse and collimated photopic light (Tyler, 1968). By definition, photopic light is measured by a sensor with the same spectral response curve as the normal human eye. In practice, the usefulness of the theoretical equation is restricted. More commonly, a simple empirically derived formula is used to estimate the attenuation coefficient for diffuse downwelling light, k, directly from Ds. Poole & Atkins (1929), in their pioneering work on light penetration in the sea, derived the relationship k × Ds – 17 for water in the English Channel. This formula is used extensively by workers who are unable to measure k directly and it is given regularly in oceanography and marine biology texts. More recently, a number of investigators have proposed alternative equations relating k to Ds in different regional seas (Table 1). However, Idso & Gilbert (1974) have fitted data of some of these authors, together with measurements of their own, to the original Poole and Atkins formula with good correlation. They suggest that k × Ds = 1.7 is a universal approximation for all natural waters. In view of the continuing importance of the Secchi disc as a measure of underwater light for primary production calculations and other studies, a universal formula is certainly desirable. However, re-examination of the Poole & Atkins measurements has revealed an error in the method of calculation of k.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , August 1980 , pp. 769 - 771
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clarke, G. L., 1941. Observations on transparency in the southwestern section of the North Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Marine Research, 4, 221–230.Google Scholar
Gall, M. H. W., 1949. Measurements to determine extinction coefficients and temperature gradients in the North Sea and English Channel. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 28, 757–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. J., 1966. Secchi disc observations and extinction coefficients in the central and eastern North Pacific Ocean. Limnology and Oceanography, 11, 184–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, R. W., 1970. The Secchi disk in turbid coastal waters. Limnology and Oceanography, 15, 688–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idso, S. B. & Gilbert, R. G., 1974. On the universality of the Poole and Atkins Secchi disc-light extinction equation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 11, 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otobe, H., Nakai, T. & Hattori, A., 1977. Underwater irradiance and Secchi disk depth in the Bering Sea and the northern North Pacific in summer. Marine Science Communications, 3, 255–270.Google Scholar
Poole, H. H. & Atkins, W. R. G., 1929. Photo-electric measurements of submarine illumination throughout the year. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 16, 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quasim, S. Z., Bhattathiri, P. M. A., & Abidi, S. A. H., 1968, Solar radiation and its penetration in a tropical estuary. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, J. E., 1968. The Secchi disc. Limnology and Oceanography, 13, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, S., 1976. Submarine daylight and ecology. Marine Biology, 37, 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar