Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:32:28.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Description of two new species of Ophthalmolycus (Teleostei: Zoarcidae) from the southern Ocean and key to species of the genus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2010

Jesús Matallanas
Jesús Matallanas*
Affiliation:
Grupo de Biodiversidad, Departamento de Biología Animal, B. Vegetal y Ecología, Facultad de Biociencias, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, E-08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J. Matallanas, Grupo de Biodiversidad, Departamento de Biología Animal, B. Vegetal y Ecología, Facultad de Biociencias, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, E-08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain email: Jesus.Matallanas@uab.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two new species of zoarcid fish, Ophthalmolycus eastmani sp. nov., and Ophthalmolycus polylepis sp. nov. are described from specimens collected from the Bellingshausen Sea and Gerlache Strait, Southern Ocean, at depths of 1837 and 1056 m. Ophthalmolycus eastmani can be distinguished from its congeners by the following combination of characters: two posterior nasal pores; epidermal prickles on lips and snout; gill slit extending ventrally to the lower margin of the pectoral fin base; vertebrae asymmetrical 26 − 27 + 91 − 92 = 117 − 118; dorsal fin rays 111–113; dorsal fin origin associated with vertebra 6, with no free pterygiophores; pectoral fin rays 17–18; two postorbital pores; lateral line with ventral and mediolateral branches; scales extending anteriorly to just anterior to the anal fin origin; six branchiostegal rays; oral valve nearly reaching the anterior edge of vomer; palatine teeth in two rows anteriorly; 3–5 pseudobranch filaments; two well developed pyloric caeca; pelvic fin and vomerine teeth present. Ophthalmolycus polylepis can be distinguished from its congeners by the following combination of characters: two posterior nasal pores; epidermal prickles on lips; gill slit extending ventrally just to below mid-pectoral fin base; interorbital pore present; two postorbital pores; lateral line triple with ventral, mediolateral and dorsolateral branches; scales extending anteriorly to predorsal area, abdomen, pelvic fins base, and pectoral fins base and axil; vertebrae asymmetrical 22 + 76; dorsal fin origin associated with vertebra 5; pectoral fin rays 18; six branchiostegal rays; oral valve overlapping the anterior edge of vomer; two rows of palatine teeth anteriorly; two vestigial pyloric caeca and 2 pseudobranch filaments; pelvic fin and vomerine teeth present. A key to the species of Ophthalmolycus is provided.

Keywords

taxonomyeelpoutsOphthalmolycus eastmaniOphthalmolycus polylepisnew speciesOphthalmolycus key
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 91 , Special Issue 2: Biodiversity and Taxonomy , March 2011 , pp. 561 - 567
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, M.E. (1982) Revision of the fish genera Gymnelus Reinhardt and Gymnelopsis Soldatov (Zoarcidae), with two new species and comparative osteology of Gymnelus viridis. National Museum, Natural Science Publications, Zoology 17, 1–76.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.E. (1988) Studies on the Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) of the southern hemisphere. I. The Antarctic and subantarctic regions. Antarctic Research Series 47, 59–113.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.E. (1990) Studies on the Zoarcidae, (Teleostei: Perciformes) of the southern hemisphere. III. The southwestern Pacific. J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Special Publication 50, 1–17.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.E. (1992) Studies on the Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) of the southern hemisphere. VI. Review of the genus Ophthalmolycus Regan, 1913, with description of a new species from Chile. J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Special Publication 53, 1–10.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.E. (1994) Systematics and osteology of the Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes). J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Ichthyological Bulletin 60, 1–120.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.E. (2006) Studies on the Zoarcidae of the southern hemisphere. X. New records from western Antarctica. Zootaxa 1110, 1–15.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.E. and Fedorov, V.V. (2004) Family Zoarcidae Swainson 1839, eelpouts. California Academy of Sciences, Annotated Checklist of Fishes 34, 1–58.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.E. and Gosztonyi, A.E. (1991) Studies on the Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) of the southern hemisphere. IV. New records and a new species from the Magellan Province of South America. J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Ichthyological Bulletin 55, 1–16.Google Scholar
Andriashev, A.P. and Fedorov, V.V. (1986) On the first finding of fishes of the family Zoarcidae in New Zealand waters. Voprosy Ikhtiologii 26, 24–32. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Eastman, J.T. (2005) The nature of the diversity of Antarctic fishes. Polar Biology 28, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosztonyi, A.E. (1977) Results of the research cruises of FRV ‘Walther Herwig’ to South America. XLVIII. Revision of the South American Zoarcidae (Osteichthyes, Blennioidei) with the description of three new genera and five new species. Archiv für Fischerei Wissenschaft 27, 191–249.Google Scholar
Garman, S. (1899) Reports of an exploration off the coasts of Mexico, Central and South America, and off Galápagos Islands, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U. S. Fish Commission steamer “Albatros”, during 1891. XXVI. The fishes. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 24, 1–431.Google Scholar
Günther, A. (1880) Report on the shore fishes procured during the voyage of H. M. S. Challenger in the years 1873–1876. Report on the Scientific Results of H.M.S. Challenger, Zoology 1, 1–82.Google Scholar
Matallanas, J. (2008) Description of Gosztonyia antarctica, a new genus and species of Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) from the Antarctic Ocean. Polar Biology 32, 15–19.Google Scholar
Matallanas, J. (2009a) Description of a new genus and species of zoarcid fish, Bellingshausenia olasoi, from the Bellingshausen Sea (Southern Ocean). Polar Biology 32, 873–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matallanas, J. (2009b) Description of Ophthalmolycus andersoni sp. nov. (Pisces, Zoarcidae) from the Antarctic Ocean. Zootaxa 2027, 55–62.Google Scholar
Matallanas, J. (2009c) Description of two new genera, Santelmoa and Bentartia, and two new species of Zoarcidae (Teleostei, Perciformes) from the Southern Ocean. Polar Biology DOI: 10.1007/s00300-009-0742-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matallanas, J. and Olaso, I. (2007) Fishes of the Bellingshausen Sea and Peter I Island. Polar Biology 30, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, P.R. and Stewart, A.L. (2006) Two new species of eelpouts (Teleostei, Zoarcidae) of the genus Seleniolycus from the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. Zootaxa 1376, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappenheim, P. (1912) Die Fische der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. Die Fische der Antarktis und Subantarktis. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 13, 160–182.Google Scholar
Regan, C.T. (1909) The classification of teleostean fishes. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 8, 75–86.Google Scholar
Regan, C.T. (1913) The Antarctic fishes of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 49, 229–292.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. (1839) The natural history and classification of fishes, amphibians, and reptiles, or monocardian animals. Volume 2. London: Spottiswoode & Co, pp. i–vi + 1–448.Google Scholar
Tomo, A.P., Marschoff, E. and Torno, A.E. (1977) Nueva especie del género Lycenchelys Gill (Pisces, Zoarcidae) hallado en las proximidades de la Isla Amberes, Península Antártica. Contribuciones Instituto Antártico Argentino 221, 1–9.Google Scholar