Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:43:57.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct Observation of Sex Change in the Patellacean Limpet Lottia Gigantea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

William G. Wright
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jola California 92037, U. S. A.
David R. Lindberg
Affiliation:
Center for Coastal Marine Studies University of CaliforniaSanta Cruz California 95064, U. S. A.

Extract

Protandric hermaphroditism, the sequential change from male to female, has been reported in several superfamilies of prosobranch gastropods including the Fissurellacea, Patellacea, Calyptraeacea, and Eulimacea (Webber, 1977). It is most common in members of the Calyptraeacea and the Patellacea. In the Calyptraeacea changes in sex are readily followed by observing copulative structures (Coe, 1944). Because patellacean limpets are predominantly broadcast spawners with external fertilization, external characters that can be used to determine the sex of individuals are rare. Hence, previous to this report the occurrence of protandry in most patellacean limpets has been based primarily on sexual dimorphism in size; the smaller size classes being made up of male individuals and the larger size classes of female individuals (Willcox, 1898; Orton, 1920, 1928; Orton, Southward & Dodd, 1956; Dodd, 1956; Branch, 1974). However, given this type of data it is often difficult to assess whether the observed sexual dimorphism is indicative of protandry or merely a result of differential growth and/or survival. The presence of simultaneous hermaphrodites in the intermediate size classes, as evidence of protandry is of limited value because simultaneous hermaphrodites occur sporadically in patellaceans that do not show a sexual dimorphism in size (Dodd, 1956; Branch, 1974). The only unambiguous way of proving the existance of protandry in patellacean limpets is the direct monitoring of gonadal changes in individuals through time. We report here the first direct observations of protandric hermaphroditism in a patellacean limpet.

Lottia gigantea Sowerby, 1834 is a large (100 + mm), territorial, intertidal limpet that ranges from northern California to central Baja California, Mexico (Stimson, 1970).

Type
Short Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Branch, G. M., 1974. The ecology of Patella Linnaeus from the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. 2. Reproductive cycles. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 41, 111160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, W. R., 1944. Sexual differentiation in mollusks. II. Gtheropods, amphineurans, scaphopods, and cephalopods. Quarterly Review of Biology, 19, 8597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, G. P., 1975. The effects of the reproductive cycle on seasonal growth trends in the owl limpet, Lottia gigantea. Bulletin. American Malacological Union, 1975, 69.Google Scholar
Dodd, J. M., 1956. Studies on the biology of limpets. III. Hermaphroditism in the three British species of Patella. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 35, 327340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1920. Sex phenomena in the common limpet {Patella vulgata). Nature, London, 104, 273.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1928. Observations on Patella vulgata. I. Sex phenomena, breeding, and shell growth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 15, 851862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. H., Southward, A. & Dodd, J. M., 1956. Studies on the biology of limpets. II. The breeding of Patella vulgata L. in Britain. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 35, 149176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, J., 1970. Territorial behavior of the owl limpet, Lottia gigantea. Ecology, 51, 113118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, H. H., 1977. Gastropoda: Prosobranchia. In Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates, vol. 4 (ed. Giese, A. C. and Pearse, J. S.), pp. 197. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Willcox, M. A., 1898. Zur Anatomie von Acmaea fragilis Chemnitz. Jenaische Zeitschrift für Natunoissenschaft, 32, 411456.Google Scholar
Wright, W. G. & Lindberg, D. R., 1979. A non-fatal method of sex determination for patellacean gastropods. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar