Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:56:00.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discriminating bluemouth, Helicolenus dactylopterus (Pisces: Sebastidae), stocks in Portuguese waters by means of otolith shape analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2010

Ana Neves ,
Vera Sequeira ,
Inês Farias ,
Ana Rita Vieira ,
Rafaela Paiva  and
Leonel Serrano Gordo
Ana Neves*
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Departamento de Biologia Animal & Centro de Oceanografia, Bloco C2, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
Vera Sequeira
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Departamento de Biologia Animal & Centro de Oceanografia, Bloco C2, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
Inês Farias
Affiliation:
Unidade de Recursos Marinhos e Sustentabilidade, Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar (IPIMAR–INRB), Avenida Brasília, 1449–006 Lisboa, Portugal
Ana Rita Vieira
Affiliation:
Unidade de Recursos Marinhos e Sustentabilidade, Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar (IPIMAR–INRB), Avenida Brasília, 1449–006 Lisboa, Portugal
Rafaela Paiva
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Departamento de Biologia Animal & Centro de Oceanografia, Bloco C2, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
Leonel Serrano Gordo
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Departamento de Biologia Animal & Centro de Oceanografia, Bloco C2, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A. Neves, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Departamento de Biologia Animal & Centro de Oceanografia, Bloco C2, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal email: ananeves73@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The understanding of the stock structure of a species is essential to effectively manage fisheries. Otolith shape analysis has been successfully applied in stock identification using the elliptic Fourier analysis. This method was used to assess possible differences in the otolith shape of Helicolenus dactylopterus caught around the Azores, Madeira and mainland Portugal. A total of 294 individuals ranging from 23 to 29 cm in total length, equally distributed by sex and area, were analysed. The multivariate analysis of variance performed on the otolith normalized elliptic Fourier descriptors (NEFDs) revealed significant differences for both area and sex, but no interaction was found between the two factors. In the canonical discriminant analysis an overall classification success of 69.4% and 66.7% was achieved for females and males respectively. These results suggest the usefulness of otolith shape analysis for stock differentiation of bluemouth from Portuguese waters.

Keywords

bluemouthHelicolenus dactylopteruselliptical Fourier analysisnorth-east Atlanticotolithshape analysisstock discrimination
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 91 , Special Issue 6: Fish Ecology , September 2011 , pp. 1237 - 1242
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aboim, M.A. (2005) Population genetics and evolutionary history of some deep-sea demersal fishes from the Azores—North Atlantic. PhD thesis. School of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Baylac, M. and Frieβ, M. (2005) Fourier descriptors, Procrustes superimposition, and data dimensionality: an example of cranial shape analysis in modern human populations. In Slice, D.E. (ed.) Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begg, G.A. and Waldman, J.R. (1999) An holistic approach to fish stock identification. Fisheries Research 43, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begg, G.A., Friedland, K.D. and Pearce, J.B. (1999) Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: an overview. Fisheries Research 43, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergenius, M., Gavin, A.J., Begg, A. and Mapstone, B. (2006) The use of otolith morphology to indicate the stock structure of common coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus) on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Fishery Bulletin 104, 498–511.Google Scholar
Bird, J.L., Eppler, D.T. and Checkley, D.M. (1986) Comparisons of herring otoliths using Fourier-series shape-analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43, 1228–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadrin, S.X. and Friedland, K.D. (1999) The utility of image processing techniques for morphometric analysis and stock identification. Fisheries Research 43, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadrin, S.X. and Friedland, K.D. (2005) Morphometric outlines. In Cadrin, S.X, Friedland, K.D. and Waldman, J.R. (eds) Stock identification methods: applications in fisheries science. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press, pp. 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campana, S.E. and Casselman, J.M. (1993) Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50, 1062–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinale, M., Doering-Arjes, P., Kastowsky, M. and Mosegaard, H. (2004) Effects of sex, stock, and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61, 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVries, D., Grimes, B. and Prager, M. (2002) Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish eastern Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean stocks of king mackerel. Fisheries Research 57, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DGPA (2009) Recursos da pesca—série estatística. Lisbon: DGPA. [In Portuguese.]Google Scholar
Farias, I., Vieira, A.R., Gordo, L.S and Figueiredo, I. (2009) Otolith shape analysis as a tool for stock discrimination of the black scabbardfish, Aphanopus carbo Lowe, 1839 (Pisces: Trichiuridae), in Portuguese waters. Scientia Marina 73 (Supplement 2), 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, M.J., Figueiredo, I. and Moura, O. (1995) Distribution, abundance and size composition of blackbelly rosefish (Helicolenus dactylopterus) and Mediterranean redfish (Hoplostethus mediterraneus) on the slope of the Portuguese south and southern west coasts. ICES CM 1995/G:10.Google Scholar
Friedland, K.D. and Reddin, D.G. (1994) Use of otolith morphology in stock discriminations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilborn, R. and Walters, C.J. (1992) Quantitative fisheries stock assessment. Choice, dynamics and uncertainty. London: Chapman and Hall, 570 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hureau, J.C. and Litvinenko, N.I. (1986) Scorpaenidae. In Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.-L., Hureau, J.-C., Nielsen, J. and Tortonese, E. (eds) Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Rome: FAO, pp. 1211–1229.Google Scholar
Ihssen, P.E., Brooke, H.E., Casselman, J.M., McGlade, J.M., Payne, N.R. and Utter, F.M. (1981) Stock identification: materials and methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38, 1838–1855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwata, H. and Ukai, Y. (2002) SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Journal of Heredity 93, 384–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, F.P. and Giardina, C.R. (1982) Elliptic Fourier features of closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18, 236–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lestrel, P.E. (1989) Method for analysing complex two-dimensional forms: elliptical Fourier functions. American Journal of Human Biology 1, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lestrel, P.E. (1997) Fourier descriptors and their applications in biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 466 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombarte, A. and Lleonart, J. (1993) Otolith size changes related with body growth, habitat depth and temperature. Environmental Biology of Fishes 37, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérigot, B., Letourneur, Y. and Lecomte-Finiger, R. (2007) Characterization of local populations of the common sole Solea solea (Pisces, Soleidae) in the NW Mediterranean through otolith morphometrics and shape analysis. Marine Biology 151, 997–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, A.D. (1994) The biology of seamounts. Advances in Marine Biology 30, 305–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sequeira, V., Figueiredo, I., Muñoz, M. and Gordo, L.S. (2003) New approach to the reproductive biology of Helicolenus dactylopterus. Journal of Fish Biology 62, 1206–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sequeira, V., Neves, A., Vieira, A.R., Figueiredo, I. and Gordo, L.S. (2009) Age and growth of bluemouth, Helicolenus dactylopterus, from the Portuguese continental slope. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66, 524–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simoneau, M., Casselman, J. and Fortin, R. (2000) Determining the effect of negative allometry (length/height relationship) on variation in otolith shape in lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush), using Fourier-series analysis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, 1597–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stransky, C. (2005) Geographic variation of golden redfish (Sebastes marinus) and deep-sea redfish (S. mentella) in the North Atlantic based on otolith shape analysis. ICES Journal of Marine Science 62, 1691–1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stransky, C., Murta, A.G., Schlickeisen, J. and Zimmermann, C. (2008) Otolith shape analysis as a tool for stock separation of horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean. Fisheries Research 89, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, S.C., Geffen, A.J., Morales-Nin, B., Gordon, J.D.M., Shimmield, T., Sawyer, T. and Massutí, E. (2006) Otolith chemistry: an aid to stock separation of Helicolenus dactylopterus (bluemouth) and Merluccius merluccius (European hake) in the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean. ICES Journal of Marine Science 63, 504–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracey, S.R., Lyle, J.M. and Duhamel, G. (2006) Application of elliptical Fourier analysis of otolith form as a tool for stock identification. Fisheries Research 77, 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uiblein, F., Lorance, O. and Latrouite, D. (2003) Behaviour and habitat utilisation of seven demersal fish species on the Bay of Biscay continental slope, NE Atlantic. Marine Ecology Progress Series 257, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldman, J.R., Richards, R.A., Schill, W.B., Wirgin, I. and Fabrizio, M.C. (1997) An empirical comparison of stock identification techniques applied to striped bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126, 369–385.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar