Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:20:14.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do cranial suture age and growth layer groups correlate in South American pinnipeds?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2017

Priscila Audibert ,
César Jaeger Drehmer ,
Daniel Danilewicz Open the ORCID record for Daniel Danilewicz [Opens in a new window]  and
Larissa Rosa de Oliveira
Priscila Audibert
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Mamíferos, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Av. Unisinos no 950, Centro 2, bloco D, sala 2D221, São Leopoldo, RS, 93022-000, Brazil
César Jaeger Drehmer
Affiliation:
Depto. de Ecologia, Zoologia & Genética, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Capão do Leão, s/no Pelotas, RS 96010-610, Brazil
Daniel Danilewicz
Affiliation:
Grupo de Estudos de Mamíferos Aquáticos do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Machado de Assis, no 1456, Osório, RS 95020-000, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas. Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (UESC). Rodovia Jorge Amado, km 16, Ilhéus, BA 45662-900, Brazil
Larissa Rosa de Oliveira*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Mamíferos, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Av. Unisinos no 950, Centro 2, bloco D, sala 2D221, São Leopoldo, RS, 93022-000, Brazil Grupo de Estudos de Mamíferos Aquáticos do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Machado de Assis, no 1456, Osório, RS 95020-000, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: L.R. de Oliveira, Laboratório de Ecologia de Mamíferos, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Av. Unisinos no 950, Centro 2, bloco D, sala 2D221, São Leopoldo, RS 93022-000, Brazil email: larissaro@unisinos.br/lari.minuano@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Age is one of the most important life history parameters required to understand the dynamics of mammalian populations. Growth Layers Groups (GLGs) are incremental units of calcified tissue in the teeth (dentine and cementum), which represent a pattern of cyclical deposition that can be counted. However, the estimation of absolute age in GLGs demands a skull with teeth, the permission to destroy part of a tooth, equipment to cut the teeth, and experienced GLGs readers. In 1954 Sivertsen proposed an alternative method using cranial suture age (CSA) to establish age categories. However, there are no studies validating the CSA in relation to GLGs. Thus, this study examined whether there is a correlation between age categories proposed by the CSA and chronological age in years from GLGs of South American fur seals (Arctocephalus australis) (N = 52) and of South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens) (N = 37). 93% of the skulls of A. australis and 83.8% of O. flavescens corresponded accurately to the age in years estimated by each cranial suture age range. These results indicated the existence of high correspondence between the CSA and the GLGs age (r: 0.491 for A. australis and r: 0.675 for O. flavescens). However, an adaptation to Sivertsen's method is recommended: using only eight sutures (excluding the premaxillary-maxillary suture for CSA analysis, due to its late fusion), and updating the intervals for cranial sutures, that correspond to 16–32 = adults, 11–15 = young and 8–10 = pups.

Keywords

skullage determinationdentineArctocephalus australisOtaria flavescenscementumchronological ageage categoriessutures
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 635 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartholomew, G.A. (1970) A model for the evolution of pinniped polygyny. Evolution 24, 546–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berta, A. and Sumich, J.L. (1999) Marine mammals: evolutionary biology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boness, D.J. (1991) Determinants of mating systems in the Otariidae (Pinnipedia). In Renouf, D. (ed.) Behaviour of pinnipeds. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Brunner, S. (1998) Cranial morphometrics of the southern fur seals Arctocephalus forsteri and A. pusillus (Carnivora: Otariidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 46, 67–108.Google Scholar
Brunner, S., Bryden, M.M. and Shaughnessy, P.D. (2004) Cranial ontogeny of otariid seals. Systematics and Biodiversity 2, 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campagna, C. (2002) Aggressive behavior (intraspecific). In Perrin, W.F., Würsig, B. and Thewissen, J.G.M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of marine mammals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cassini, M.H. (1999) The evolution of reproductive systems in pinnipeds. Behaviour Ecology 10, 612–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughley, G. (1966) Mortality patterns in mammals. Ecology 47, 906–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. (1988) Reproductive success. Studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 538 pp.Google Scholar
Crespo, E.A. (1988) Dinámica poblacional del lobo marino del sur Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800), en el norte del litoral patagónico. PhD thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina, 298 pp.Google Scholar
Crespo, E.A., Schiavini, A., Perez-Macri, G., Reyes, L. and Dans, S. (1994) Estudios sobre la determinación de edad en mamíferos marinos del Atlántico Sudoccidental. In Abstracts of the ‘4ª reunión de trabajo de expertos en mamíferos acuáticos de America del Sur’, 12–15 November. 1990, Valdivia, Chile, pp. 31–55.Google Scholar
Drehmer, C.J., Fabian, M.E. and Menegheti, J.O. (2004) Dental anomalies in the Atlantic population of South American sea lion, Otaria byronia (Pinnipedia, Otariidae): evolutionary implications and ecological approach. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 3, 7–18.Google Scholar
Drehmer, C.J. and Ferigolo, J. (1996) Descrição do sincrânio de Arctocephalus australis (Pinnipedia, Otariidae). Iheringia Série Zoologia 81, 63–74.Google Scholar
Drehmer, C.J. and Ferigolo, J. (1997) Osteologia craniana comparada entre Arctocephalus australis e Arctocephalus tropicalis (Pinnipedia, Otariidae). Iheringia Série Zoologia 83, 7–149.Google Scholar
Drehmer, C.J. and Oliveira, L.R. (2000) Syncranial osteology of Arctocephalus gazella (Pinnipedia, Otariidae) from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Iheringia. Série Zoologia 88, 51–59.Google Scholar
Ericson, P.G.P. and Stora, J. (1999) A manual for the skeletal measurements of the seal genera Halichoerus and Phoca (Mammalia: Pinnipedia). Stockholm: Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, 25 pp.Google Scholar
Grandi, M.F., Dans, S., García, N.A. and Crespo, E.A. (2009) Growth and age at sexual maturity of South American sea lions. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 75, 427–436.Google Scholar
Jones, K.E. and Goswami, A. (2009) Quantitative analysis of the influences of phylogeny and ecology on phocid and otariid pinniped (Mammalia, Carnivora) cranial morphology. Journal of Zoology 280, 297–308.Google Scholar
Klevezal, G.A. (1980) Layers in the hard tissues of mammals as a record of growth rhythms of individuals. In Perrin, W.F. and Myrick, A.C. (eds) Age determination of toothed whales and sirenians. Report of the International Whaling Commission, Special Issue 3, 89–94.Google Scholar
Laws, E.M. (1962) Age determination of pinnipeds with special reference to the growth layers in the teeth. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 27, 129–146.Google Scholar
Leigh, S.R. (1992) Patterns of variation in the ontogeny of primate body size dimorphism. Journal of Human Evolution 23, 27–50.Google Scholar
Lindenfors, P., Tullberg, B.S. and Biuw, M. (2002) Phylogenetic analyses of sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds. Behaviour Ecology and Sociobiology 52, 188–193.Google Scholar
Meindl, R.S. and Lovejoy, C.O. (1985) Ectocranial suture closure: a revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral-anterior sutures. American Journal of Physiology and Anthropology 68, 57–66.Google Scholar
Miller, E.H., Stewart, A.R.J. and Stenson, B.G. (1998) Bacular and testicular growth, allometry, and variation in the harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus). Journal of Mammalogy 79, 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina-Schiller, D. and Pinedo, M.C. (2004a) Growth layer pattern in Arctocephalus australis canine teeth: evaluation of techniques for age determination. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 3, 107–118.Google Scholar
Molina-Schiller, D. and Pinedo, M.C. (2004b) Growth and skull development in the South American fur seal, Arctocephalus australis (Zimmermann, 1783) (Carnivora: otariidae) from Rio Grande do Sul Coast, Brazil. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 3, 95–105.Google Scholar
Oliveira, L.R. (1999) Caracterização dos padrões de ocorrência dos pinípedes (Carnivora: Pinnipedia) ocorrentes no Litoral do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, entre 1993 e 1998. Master thesis. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.Google Scholar
Oliveira, L.R. (2013) Carnívoros Marinhos. In Weber, M.M., Roman, C. and Cáceres, N.C. (eds) Mamíferos do Rio Grande do Sul. Santa Maria: Editora UFSM, 544 pp.Google Scholar
Oliveira, L.R., Hingst-Zaher, E. and Morgante, J.S. (2005) Size and shape sexual dimorphism in the skull of the South American fur seal, Arctocephalus australis (Zimmermann, 1783) (Carnivora: Otariidae). Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 4, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, L.R., Hoffman, J.J., Hingst-Zaher, E., Majluf, P., Muelbert, M.M.C., Morgante, J.S. and Amos, W. (2008) Morphological and genetic evidence for two evolutionarily significant units (ESUS) in the South American fur seal, Arctocephalus australis. Conservation Genetics 9, 1451–1466.Google Scholar
Perrin, W.F. and Myrick, A.C. (1980) Age determination in toothed whales and Sirenians. Report of the International Whaling Commission, Special Issue 3.Google Scholar
Pinedo, M.C. (1986) Mortalidade de Pontoporia blainvillei, Tursiops gephyreus, Otaria flavescens e Arctocephalus australis na costa do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, 1976–1983. In Abstracts of the ‘Primera reunión de trabajo de expertos en mamıíferos acuáticos de America del Sur’. First workshop meeting of South American Aquatic Mammals Specialist Group, Buenos Aires, Argentina, October 1986, pp. 187–189.Google Scholar
Riedman, M. (1990) The pinnipeds; seals, sea lions, and walruses. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rosas, F.C.W., Haimovici, M. and Pinedo, M.C. (1993) Age and growth of the South American sea lion, Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800), in southern Brazil. Journal of Mammalogy 74, 141–147.Google Scholar
Rosas, F.C.W., Pinedo, M.C., Marmontel, M. and Haimovici, M. (1994) Seasonal movements of the South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens, Shaw) off the Rio Grande do Sul coast, Brazil. Mammalia 58, 51–59.Google Scholar
Sanfelice, D. and Ferigolo, J. (2008) Estudo comparativo entre os sincrânios de Otaria byronia e Arctocephalus australis (Pinnipedia, Otariidae). Iheringia Série Zoologia 98, 5–16.Google Scholar
Sanfelice, D. and Freitas, T. R. O. (2008) A comparative description of dimorphism in skull ontogeny of Arctocephalus australis, Callorhinus ursinus and Otaria byronia (Carnivora: Otariidae). Journal of Mammalogy 89, 336–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, V.B. and Myrick, A.C. (1980) A review of studies to 1970 of growth layers in the teeth of marine mammals. In Age determination in toothed whales and Sirenians. Report of the International Whaling Commission, Special Issue 3, 51–63.Google Scholar
Schiavini, A.C.M., Lima, M. and Batallés, L.M. (1992) Growth structures of maxillary canines of the southern fur seal (Arctocephalus australis). Marine Mammal Science 8, 89–93.Google Scholar
Simões-Lopes, P.C., Drehmer, C.J. and Ott, P.O. (1995) Nota sobre os Otariidae e Phocidae (Mammalia: Carnivora) da costa norte do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina, Brasil. Biociências 3, 173–181.Google Scholar
Sivertsen, E. (1954) A survey on the eared seals (family Otariidae) with remarks on the Antarctic seals collected by M/K “Norvegia” in 1928–1929. Scientific Results of the Norwegian Antarctic Expeditions, 36. Oslo: Det Norske Vidskaps Akademi I Oslo.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (2009) Introduction to biostatistics, 2nd edition, Dover Edition. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Stora, J. (2001) Skeletal development in the grey seal Halichoerus grypus, the ringed seal Phoca hispida botnica, the harbour seal Phoca vitulina vitulina and the harp seal Phoca groenlandica. Epiphyseal fusion and life history. In Pike-Tay A. (ed.) Innovations in assessing season of capture, age and sex of archaeofaunas. ArchaeoZoologia, XI/1.2. La Pensée Sauvage, Grenoble, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Tarnawski, B.A., Flores, D., Cassini, G. and Cappozzo, L.H. (2015) A comparative analysis on the cranial ontogeny of South American fur seals (Otariidae: Arctocephalus). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 173, 249–269.Google Scholar
York, A.N. (1994) The population dynamics of northern sea lions, 1975–1985. Marine Mammals Science 10, 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar