Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:07:22.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamics of Colonization by the Beadlet Anemone, Actinia Equina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. C. Brace  and
D. L. J. Quicke
R. C. Brace
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD
D. L. J. Quicke
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Colonization of the littoral zone presents many problems to both sessile and relatively sessile invertebrates. These may be especially acute for inhabitants of the upper reaches of this zone, since suitable niches are usually sparsely distributed there, and are often ephemeral in nature. Consequently, both intraand inter-specific competition for space is likely to be particularly intense.

The widely distributed and abundant, beadlet anemone, Actinia equina L., in common with a number of other littoral anthozoans, is apparently capable of both asexual (apomixis or somatic embryogenesis; Polteva, 1963; Gashout & Ormond, 1979; Orr, Thorpe & Carter, 1982) and sexual (Carter & Thorp, 1979) reproduction. The former results in the production of young, which are brooded within the coelenteron and which appear most suited to local dispersal, whilst the latter, if it occurs, is assumed to involve either ovipary or larvipary followed by a planktonic phase. Study of this species therefore affords an opportunity to investigate the dynamics of colonization and dispersal in an heterogeneous environment, in relation to flexibility in reproductive tactics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , February 1986 , pp. 21 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, J. H. & Annandale, N., 1904. Observations on some aged specimens of Sagartia troglodytes, and on the duration of life in coelenterates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 25 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayre, D. J., 1982. Inter-genotype aggression in the solitary sea anemone Actinia tenebrosa. Marine Biology, 68 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayre, D. J., 1983. The effects of asexual reproduction and inter-genotypic aggression on the genotypic structure of populations of the sea anemone Actinia tenebrosa. Oecologia, 57, 158–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayre, D. J., 1984 a. Effects of environment and population density on the sea anemone Actinia tenebrosa. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 35 735–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayre, D. J., 1984 b. The effects of sexual and asexual reproduction on geographic variation in the sea anemone Actinia tenebrosa. Oecologia, 62, 222—229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballantine, W. J., 1961. A biologically-defined exposure scale for the comparative description of rocky shores. Field Studies, 1(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
Batcheldar, H. P. & Gonor, J. J., 1981. Population characteristics of the intertidal green sea anemone, Anthopleura xanthogrammica on the Oregon coast. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 13 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, R. & Johnson, M. S., 1979. Asexual viviparity and population genetics of Actinia tenebrosa. Marine Biology, 53 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnin, J. P., 1964. Recherches sur la ‘réaction d'egression’, et sur le fonctionnement des acrorrhages d'Actinia equina L. Bulletin biologique de la France et de la Belgique, 1, 225—250.Google Scholar
Brace, R. C., & Pavey, J., 1978. Size-dependent dominance hierarchy in the anemone Actinia equina. Nature, London, 273 752–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, R. C., Pavey, J. & Quicke, D. L. J., 1979. Intraspecific aggression in the colour morphs of the anemone Actinia equina: the ‘convention’ governing dominance ranking. Animal Behaviour, 27 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, R. C. & Quicke, D. L. J., 1985. Further analysis of individual spacing within aggregations of the anemone, Actinia equina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, R. C. & Quicke, D. L. J., 1986. Seasonal changes in dispersion within an aggregation of the anemone, Actinia equina, with a reappraisal of the role of intraspecific aggression. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 66 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucklin, A., 1982. The annual cycle of sexual reproduction in the sea anemone Metridium senile. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 60 3241–3248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucklin, A., Hedgecock, D. & Hand, C., 1984. Genetic evidence of self fertilization in the sea anemone Epiactis prolifera. Marine Biology, 84 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, M. A. & Funnell, M., 1980. Reproduction and brooding in Actinia. In Developmental and Cellular Biology of Coelenterates (ed. P., Tardent and R., Tardent), pp. 17—22. New York: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Carter, M. A. & Thorp, C. H., 1979. The reproduction of Actinia equina L. var. mesembryanthemum. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59 989–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, M. A. & Thorpe, J. P., 1981. Reproductive, genetic and ecological evidence that Actinia equina var. mesembryanthemum and var. fragacea are not conspecific. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, F.-S., 1976. Sea anemone reproduction: patterns and adaptive radiations. In Coelenterate Ecology and Behaviour (ed. Mackie, G. O.), pp. 261—270. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, F. -S. & Rostron, M. A., 1970. Some aspects of the reproductive biology of Actinia equina (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalby, D. H., Cowell, E. B., Syratt, W. J. & Crowthers, J. H., 1978. An exposure scale for marine shores in western Norway. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 975”996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donoghue, A. M., Quicke, D. L. J. & Brace, R. C., 1985. Biochemical-genetic and acrorhagial characteristics of pedal disc colour phenotypes of Actinia equina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gashout, S. E. & Ormond, R. F. G., 1979. Evidence for parthenogenetic reproduction in the sea anemone Actinia equina L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59 975–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosse, P. H., 1860. A History of the British Sea Anemones and Corals. London: Van Voorst.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. & May, R. M., 1977. Dispersal in stable habitats. Nature, London, 269 578–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrick, P. W., Ginevan, M. E. & Ewing, E. P., 1976. Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 7 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, H. S., 1978. Optimal tactics of reproduction and life-history. In Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach (ed. Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B.), pp. 411–429. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Jaenike, J., 1982. On the relation between genetic and environmental variability in animals. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 18 310–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaenike, J. & Selander, R. K., 1979. Evolution and ecology of parthenogenesis in earthworms. American Zoologist, 19 729–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkman, A. & Carter, M. A., 1980. The spermatozoon of Actinia equina L. var. mesembryanthemum. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. R., 1964. The Ecology of Rocky Shores. London: The English Universities Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Lubbock, R., 1980. Chemical recognition and nematocyte excitation in a sea anemone. Journal of Experimental Biology, 83 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubbock, R. & Allbut, C., 1981. The sea anemone Actinia equina tolerates allogeneic juveniles but alters their phenotype. Nature, London, 293 474–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macarthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O., 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography.Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Smith J., 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mcleod, M. J., Hornback, D. J., Guttman, S. I., Way, C. M. & Burky, A. J., 1981. Environ-mental heterogeneity, genetic polymorphism and reproductive strategies. American Naturalist, 118 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, J., Thorpe, J. P. & Carter, M. A., 1982. Biochemical genetic confirmation of the asexual reproduction of brooded offspring in the sea anemone Actinia equina. Marine Ecology – Progress Series, 7 227–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottaway, J. R., 1978. Population ecology of the intertidal anemone Actinia tenebrosa. I. Pedal locomotion and intraspecific aggression. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 29 787–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottaway, J. R., 1979 a. Population ecology of the intertidal anemone Actinia tenebrosa. II. Geographical distribution, synonymy, reproductive cycle and fecundity. Australian Journal of Zoology, 27 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottaway, J. R., 1979 b. Population ecology of the intertidal anemone Actinia tenebrosa. III. Dynamics and environmental factors. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 30 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottaway, J. R., 1980. Population ecology of the intertidal anemone Actinia tenebrosa. IV. Growth rates and longevities. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 31 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polteva, D. G., 1963. Regeneration and somatic embryogenesis of Actinia equina in different stages of ontogenic development. Acta biologica Academiae scientiarum hungariacae, 14 199–208.Google Scholar
Quicke, D. L. J. & Brace, R. C., 1983. Phenotypic and genotypic spacing within an aggregation of the anemone, Actinia equina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quicke, D. L. J. & Brace, R. C., 1984. Evidence for the existence of a third, ecologically distinct morph of the anemone, Actinia equina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 531—534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quicke, D. L. J., Donoghue, A. M. & Brace, R. C., 1983. Biochemical-genetic and ecological evidence that red/brown individuals of the anemone Actinia equina comprise two morphs in Britain. Marine Biology, 77 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quicke, D. L. J., Donoghue, A. M., Keeling, T. F. & Brace, R. C., 1985. Littoral distributions and evidence for differential post-settlement selection of the morphs of Actinia equina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, T. D., 1985. The Population Ecology and Behaviour of Actinia equina. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Rostron, M. A. & Rostron, J., 1978. Fecundity and reproductive ecology of a natural population of Actinia equina L. (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). Journal ofExperimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 33 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K. P., 1979. The energetics of asexual reproduction and colony formation in benthic marine invertebrates. American Zoologist, 19 683–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K. P., 1980. The control of body size and longitudinal fission in the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 158 370–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K. P., 1981 a. Reproductive ecology of the intertidal sea anemones Anthopleura xanthogrammica (Brandt) and A. elegantissima (Brandt): body size, habitat, and sexual reproduction. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 54 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K. P., 1981 b. Recruitment in a sea anemone population: juvenile substratum becomes adult prey. Science, New York, 213 785–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K. P., 1982 a. Recruitment and habitat selection in the intertidal sea anemones, Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt) and A. xanthogrammica (Brandt). Journal of Experimental Biology and Ecology, 59 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K. P., 1982 b. Asexual reproduction in Anthopleura elegantissima (Anthozoa: Actiniaria): seasonally and spatial extent of clones. Ecology, 63 434–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebens, K. P., 1982 c. The limits to indeterminate growth: an optimal size model applied to passive suspension feeders. Ecology, 63 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, R. K. & Kaufman, D. W., 1973. Genie variability and strategies of adaptation in animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 70 1875–1877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, P. R. & Prasad, R., 1970. Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes — a compilation of recipes. Biochemical Genetics, 4 297–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southwood, T. R. E., 1978. Ecological Methods with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Stearns, S. C., 1976. Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. Quarterly Review of Biology, 51 3–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strathmann, R. R. & Strathmann, M. F., 1982. The relationship between adult size and brooding in marine invertebrates. American Naturalist, 119 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, P. W., 1981. Spatial distribution and dynamics of populations of the introduced annual Etnex australis in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology, 18 849–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, H. & King, J. L., 1980. A general ‘exact test’ for N × M contingency tables. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science, 79 65–77.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C., 1975. Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed