Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:51:25.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food resource, gametogenesis and growth of Mytilus edulis on the shore and in suspended culture: Killary Harbour, Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. G. Rodhouse ,
C. M. Roden ,
G. M. Burnell ,
M. P. Hensey ,
T. McMahon ,
B. Ottway  and
T. H. Ryan
P. G. Rodhouse
Affiliation:
'Shellfish Research Laboratory, Carna, Co. Galway, Ireland.
C. M. Roden
Affiliation:
'Shellfish Research Laboratory, Carna, Co. Galway, Ireland.
G. M. Burnell
Affiliation:
'Shellfish Research Laboratory, Carna, Co. Galway, Ireland.
M. P. Hensey
Affiliation:
'Shellfish Research Laboratory, Carna, Co. Galway, Ireland.
T. McMahon
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University College, Galway, Ireland.
B. Ottway
Affiliation:
Department of Science, Regional Technical College, Dublin Road, Galway, Ireland.
T. H. Ryan
Affiliation:
'Shellfish Research Laboratory, Carna, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mussels, Mytilus edulis L. grow on the shore and are cultured on ropes in Killary Harbour, a fjordic inlet on the Irish west coast. The food resource available to cultured mussels differs from that available to wild mussels on the shore. Although phytoplankton densities as estimated from chlorophyll a concentrations are similar, the shore environment in the inner part of the inlet is characterized by high mean POC concentrations. This is because of the presence of variable amounts ofallochthonous detrital carbon.

The annual cycles of flesh weight and ash content of wild and cultivated mussels were followed over two years. These cycles were related to the reproductive cycle observed by taking histological samples of mussel gonad, by plankton sampling for larvae and by monitoring larval settlement. Shell growth was measured in wild mussels by reading seasonal growth patterns on sectioned shells and in cultured mussels by following progress of the modal shell length of cohorts on ropes.

Wild mussels have a partial spawning in early spring and spawn completely in the summer. Cultured mussels spawn twice during the summer, in the year following settlement. Growth rate of wild mussels decreases with increasing aerial exposure. The fastest growing mussels, at o % exposure, take about 6 years to attain the length attained by the mode of the cultured mussels after 18 months, when they are harvested.

We conclude that wild mussels utilize a mix of phytoplankton and detritus as food during the summer and that large wild mussels can use detritus during the autumn and early winter for an increase in flesh weight and gametogenesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , August 1984 , pp. 513 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bayne, B. L. 1976. Aspects of reproduction in bivalve molluscs. In Estuarine Processes, vol. I (ed. Wiley, M.) pp. 432–448. Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, B. L. & Worrall, C. M. 1980. Growth and production of mussels Mytilus edulis from two populations. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 3, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, B. L.Holland, D. L.Moore, M. N.Lowe, D. M. & Widdows, J. 1978. Further studies on the effects of stress in the adult on the eggs of Mytilus edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 825–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blegvad, H. 1914. Food and conditions of nourishment among the communities of invertebrate animals found on or in the sea bottom in Danish waters. Report of the Danish Biological Station to the Board of Agriculture, 22, 41–78.Google Scholar
Coe, W. R. & Fox, D. L. 1942. Biology of the Californian sea mussel Mytilus californianus. I. Influence of temperature, food supply, sex and age on the rate of growth. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 90, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, W. R. & Fox, D. L. 1944. Biology of the Californian sea mussel Mytilus calif ornianus. III. Environmental conditions and the rate of growth. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 87, 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. L. & Coe, W. R. 1943. Biology of the Californian sea mussel {Mytilus calif ornianus). II. Nutrition, metabolism, growth and calcium deposition. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 93, 205–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraga, F. & Vives, F. 1960. Retencion de particulas organicas par el mejillon en los viveros flotantes. Reunion sobre productividady presquerias Barcelona, 4, 71–73.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. J. 1980. Natural food availability and assimilation in the bivalve Choromytilus meridionalis. Marine Ecology - Progress Series, 3, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Incze, L. S. & Lutz, R. A. & Watling, L. 1980. Relationships between effects of environmental temperature and seston on growth and mortality of Mytilus edulis in a temperate northern estuary. Marine Biology, 57, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby-Smith, W. W. 1976. The detritus problem and the feeding and digestion of an estuarine organism. In stuarine Processes, vol. 1 (ed. Wiley, M.) pp. 468–479. Academic Press.Google Scholar
KiorboeT. Mohlenberg, F. T. Mohlenberg, F. & Nohr, O. 1981. Effect of suspended bottom material on growth and energetics in Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology, 61, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legall, P. 1970. Etude des mouliéres Normandes: renouvellement, croissance. Vie et milieu (ser. B), 21, 545–590.Google Scholar
Lubet, P. 1957. Cycle sexuel de Mytilus edulis L. et de Mytilusgalloprovincialis Lmk. dans le Bassin d'Arcachon (Gironde).Annee biologique, 33, 19–29.Google Scholar
Lubet, P. 1959. Recherches sur le cycle sexuel et remission de gamétes chez les Mytilides et les Pectinides (Mollusques Bivalves). Revue des iravaux. Institute despeches matitimes, 23,387–548.Google Scholar
Lubet, P. & Legall, P. 1967. Observations sur le cycle sexuel deMytilus edulis L. a Luc-s-Mer. Bulletin de la Societe linneenne de Normandie, 10, 303–307.Google Scholar
Lutz, R. A. 1976. Annual growth patterns in the inner shell layer of Mytilus edulis L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 723–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, R. A. 1980. Mussel Culture and Harvest: a North American Perspective. 350 pp. Amsterdam:Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lutz, R. A.Incze, L. S.Porter, B. & Stotz, J. K. 1980. Seasonal variation in the condition of raft-cultivated mussels (Mytilus edulis L.). Proceedings of the World Mariculture Society, 11, 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, K. H. 1972. Macrophyte production and detritus food chains in coastal waters. Memorie del'Istituto italiano di idrobiologie Dott. Marco de Marchi, 29 (supplement), 353–383.Google Scholar
Mason, J. 1976. Cultivation. In Marine Mussels: Their Ecology and Physiology (ed. Bayne, B. L.) pp. 385–410. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, R. I. E.Hilbish, T. J.Koehn, R. K. & Newell, C. J. 1982. Temporal variation in the reproductive cycle of Mytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia, Mytilidae) from localities on the east coast of the United States. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 162, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics for fish populations. Bulletin. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, no. 191,382 pp.Google Scholar
Rodhouse, P. G. 1978. Energy transformations by the oyster Ostrea edulis L. in a temperate estuary. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 34, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell-Hunter, W. D. 1970. Aquatic Productivity. 360 pp. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Seed, R. 1976. Ecology. In Marine Mussels: Their Ecology and Physiology (ed. Bayne, B. L.), pp. 13–65. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stephenson, R. L. & Lyon, G. L. 1982. Carbon-13 depletion in an estuarine bivalve: detection of marine and terrestrial food sources. Oecologia, 55, 110–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, J. D. H. & Parsons, T. R. 1972. A practical handbook of seawater analysis, 2nd edition. Bulletin. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, no. 167, 310 pp.Google Scholar
Stuart, V. 1982. Absorbed ration, respiratory costs and resultant scope for growth in the mussel Aulacomya ater (Molina) fed on a diet of kelp detritus of different ages. Marine Biology Letters, 3, 289–306.Google Scholar
Stuart, V.Field, J. G. & Newell, R. C. 1982. Evidence for absorption of kelp detritus by the ribbed mussel Aulacomya ater using a new 16 Cr-labelled microsphere technique. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 9, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenore, K. R. 1977. Utilization of aged detritus from different sources by the polychaete Capitella capitata. Marine Biology, 44, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenore, K. R. & Hanson, R. B. 1980. Availability of detritus with ageing to a polychaete macroconsumer, Capitella capitata. Limnology and Oceanography, 25, 553–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theisen, B. F. 1973. The growth ofMytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia) from Disko and Thule district, Greenland. Ophelia, 12, 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. J. & Bayne, B. L. 1974. Some relationships between growth, metabolism and food in the musselMytilus edulis L. Marine Biology, 27, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahl, O. 1980. Seasonal variations in seston and the growth rate of the Iceland scallop Chlamys islandica (O. F. Miiller) from Balsfjord, 70°N. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 48, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdows, J. 1978a. Combined effects of body size, food concentration and season on the physiology of Mytilus edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdows, J. 1978b. Physiological indices of stress in Mytilus edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdows, J.Feith, P. & Worrall, C. M. 1979. Relationships between seston, available food and feeding activity in the common mussel Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology, 50, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. 1981. Detritus utilization by Mytilus edulis. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 12, 739–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, J. E. & Langton, R. W. 1976. Feeding experiments with Mytilus edulis L. at small laboratory scale. I. The influence of the total amount of food ingested and food concentration on growth. In Research in Mariculture at Laboratory and Pilot Scale, vol. 1. Proceedings of the 10th European Symposium on Marine Biology, Ostend, Belgium, 1975 (ed. Persoone, G. and Jaspers, E.), pp. 565–581. Wetteren, Belgium: Universa Press.Google Scholar