Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:32:48.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Guild composition and habitat use by Tetraodontiformes (Teleostei, Acanthopterygii) in a south-western Atlantic tropical estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

Amanda Carvalho De Andrade ,
Sérgio Ricardo Santos ,
José Roberto Verani  and
Marcelo Vianna
Amanda Carvalho De Andrade
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho 373 (Bl. A), 21941-902, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brasil
Sérgio Ricardo Santos*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho 373 (Bl. A), 21941-902, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brasil
José Roberto Verani
Affiliation:
Departamento de Hidrobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Rod. Washington Luiz, Km 235, 13565-905, São Carlos/SP, Brasil
Marcelo Vianna
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho 373 (Bl. A), 21941-902, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brasil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:S.R. Santos, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Av. Carlos Chagas Filho 373 (Bl. A), 21941-902 Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brasil email: srbs@ufrj.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sampling of the demersal ichthyofauna of Guanabara Bay was conducted bimonthly for 2 years at 10 stations distributed along a hydrobiological gradient. A total of 16,081 Tetraodontiformes specimens were collected, representing 10 species distributed among Ostraciidae, Monacanthidae, Tetraodontidae and Diodontidae. Tetraodontiformes appear to be well adapted to hydrological variations and inhospitable conditions prompted by intense eutrophication. However, abiotic factors traditionally considered important in estuarine community structure play a secondary role in the distribution of Tetraodontiformes. The type of sediment appears to be the most important physical factor but acts only as an indicator of ecological domain. The low explanatory power of physicochemical variables, in addition to the relative stability of the bay's ichthyofauna, suggests an influence of biological parameters. The species exhibited wide variation in their use of Guanabara Bay and utilized it as a resting, feeding and growing area. Among the species captured, Stephanolepis hispidus, Lagocephalus laevigatus, Sphoeroides greeleyi, Sphoeroides testudineus, Sphoeroides tyleri, Chilomycterus reticulatus and Chilomycterus spinosus were categorized as marine estuarine opportunists, and Aluterus heudelotii and Aluterus schoepfii were classified as marine stragglers. Acanthostracion sp. could not be categorized. The boom of C. spinosus indicates an ecological misbalance and must be carefully investigated.

Keywords

Impacted ecosystemestuarine fishesfunctional groupsTetraodontiformespopulation biologytropical estuariesGuanabara Baysouth-western AtlanticBrazil
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 96 , Issue 6 , September 2016 , pp. 1251 - 1264
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrade-Tubino, M.F., Fiore-Correia, L.B. and Vianna, M. (2009) Morphometrics and length structure of Micropogonias furnieri (Desmarest, 1823) (Perciformes, Sciaenidae) in Guanabara Bay, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 35, 239–246.Google Scholar
Azevedo, M.C.C., Araújo, F.G., Cruz-Filho, A.G., Pessanha, A.L.M., Silva, M.A. and Guedes, A.P.P. (2007) Demersal fishes in a tropical bay in southeastern Brazil: partitioning the spatial, temporal and environmental components of ecological variation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 75, 468–480.Google Scholar
Barletta, M., Amaral, C.S., Corrêa, M.F.M., Guebert, D., Dantas, D.V., Lorenzi, L. and Saint-Paul, U. (2008) Factors affecting seasonal variations in demersal fish assemblages at an ecocline in a tropical-subtropical estuary. Journal of Fish Biology 73, 1314–1336.Google Scholar
Barletta, M. and Blaber, S.J.M. (2007) Comparison of fish assemblages and guilds in tropical habitats of the Embly (Indo-West Pacific) and Caeté (Western Atlantic) estuaries. Bulletin of Marine Science 80, 647–680.Google Scholar
Barletta-Bergan, A., Barletta, M. and Saint-Paul, U. (2002) Community structure and temporal variability of ichthyoplankton in North Brazilian mangrove creeks. Journal of Fish Biology 60(suppl. A), 33–51.Google Scholar
Begot, L.H. and Vianna, M. (2014) Legislação pesqueira costeira: O caso da Baía de Guanabara, RJ. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 40, 497–520.Google Scholar
Blaber, S.J.M. (2000) Tropical estuarine fishes – ecology, exploitation and conservation. London: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Blaber, S.J.M. (2013) Fish and fisheries in tropical estuaries: the last 10 years. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Research 135, 57–65.Google Scholar
Bouchereau, J.-L. and Chaves, P.T.C. (2003) Ichthyofauna in the ecological organization of a Southwest Atlantic ecosystem: the bay of Guaratuba, Brazil (25°52′S; 48°39′W). Vie Milieu Life and Environment 53, 103–110.Google Scholar
Castro, M.S., Bonecker, A.C.T. and Valentin, J.L. (2005) Seasonal variation in fish larvae at the entrance of Guanabara Bay, Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 48, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chagas, L.P., Joyeux, J.C., and Fonseca, F.R. (2006) Small-scale spatial changes in estuarine fish: subtidal assemblages in tropical Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biology Association of the United Kingdom 86, 861–875.Google Scholar
Denadai, M.R., Santos, F.B., Bessa, E., Bernardes, L.P. and Turra, A. (2012) Population biology and diet of the puffer fish Lagocephalus laevigatus (Tetraodontiformes: Tetraodontidae) in Caraguatatuba Bay, south-eastern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 92, 407–412.Google Scholar
Elliott, M., Whitfield, A.K., Potter, I.C., Blaber, S.J.M., Cyrus, D.P., Nordlie, F.G., and Harrison, T.D. (2007) The guild approach to categorizing estuarine fish assemblages: a global review. Fish and Fisheries 8, 241–268.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, J.L. and Menezes, N.A. (2000) Manual de peixes do sudeste do Brasil VI. Teleostei (5). São Paulo: Museu de Zoologia Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Fischer, W. (1978) FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes – Western Central Atlantic (Fishing area 31), Volume II. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
García-Hernández, V., Ordóñez-López, U., Hernández-Vázquez, T. and Álvarez-Cadena, J.N. (2009) Fish larvae and juveniles checklist (Pisces) from the northern Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico, with 39 new records for the region. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 80, 85–94.Google Scholar
Gomes, A.P.P., Keunecke, K.A., Silva-Júnior, D.M. and Vianna, M. (2013) Modulating reproduction of Penaeidae shrimps: ecological responses of two sympatric species (Decapoda: Dendrobranchiata) on south-eastern Brazilian coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 93, 733–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, S., Azevedo, A.F., and Moreira, L.H.A. (2006) Fisheries and conflicts in Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 49, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawata, Y. (2012) Fishery resource recovery strategy without reducing the number of landings: a case study of the ocellate puffer in Japan. Ecological Economics 77, 225–233.Google Scholar
Keunecke, K.A., D'Incao, F., Verani, J.R. and Vianna, M. (2012) Reproductive strategies of two sympatric swimming crabs Callinectes danae and Callinectes ornatus (Crustacea: Portunidae) in a estuarine system, south-eastern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 92, 343–347.Google Scholar
Konstantinidis, P. and Johnson, G.D. (2012) Ontogeny of the jaw apparatus and suspensorium of the Tetraodontiformes. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 93, 351–366.Google Scholar
Kupschus, S. and Tremain, D. (2001) Associations between fish assemblages and environmental factors in nearshore habitats of a subtropical estuary. Journal of Fish Biology 58, 1383–1403.Google Scholar
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Leis, J.M. (2006) Nomenclature and distribution of the species of the porcupinefish family Diodontidae (Pisces, Teleostei). Memoirs of Museum Victoria 63, 77–90.Google Scholar
López-Peralta, R.H. and Arcila, C.A.T. (2002) Diet composition of fish species from the southern continental shelf of Colombia. Naga, World Fish Center Quarterly 25, 23–29.Google Scholar
Lyczkowski-Shultz, J. (2006) Tetraodontidae: puffers. In Richards, W.J. (ed.) Early stages of Atlantic fishes: an identification guide for the Western Central North Atlantic, Volume"2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 2449–2458.Google Scholar
Maes, J., Van Damme, S., Meire, P. and Ollevier, F. (2004) Statistical modeling of seasonal and environmental influences on the population dynamics of an estuarine fish community. Marine Biology 145, 1033–1042.Google Scholar
Magurran, A.E. (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mancera-Rodríguez, N.J. and Castro-Hernandez, J.J. (2004) Age and growth of Stephanolepis hispidus (Linnaeus, 1766) (Pisces: Monacanthidae), in the Canary Islands area. Fisheries Research 66, 381–386.Google Scholar
Mancera-Rodríguez, N.J. and Castro-Hernández, J.J. (2015) Reproductive biology of the planehead filefish Stephanolepis hispidus (Pisces: Monacanthidae), in the Canary Islands area. Ichthyological Research 62, 258–267.Google Scholar
Matsuura, K. (2015) Taxonomy and systematics of tetraodontiform fishes: a review focusing primarily on progress in the period from 1980 to 2014. Ichthyological Research 62, 72–113.Google Scholar
Mayr, L.M., Tenenbaum, D.R., Villac, M.C., Paranhos, R., Nogueira, C., Bonecker, S. and Bonecker, A. (1989) Hydrobiological characterization of Guanabara Bay. In Neves, C. (ed.) Coastlines of Brazil. New York, NY: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 124–138.Google Scholar
McEachran, J.D. and Fechhelm, J.D. (2005) Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, Volume 2: Scorpaeniformes to Tetraodontiformes. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Menezes, N.A., Buckup, P.A., Figueiredo, J.L. and Moura, R.L. (2003) Catálogo das espécies de peixes marinhos do Brasil. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, 159 pp.Google Scholar
Mulato, I.P., Correa, B. & Vianna, M. (2015) Distribuição espaço-temporal de Micropogonias furnieri (Perciformes, Sciaenidae) em um estuário tropical no sudeste do Brasil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 41, 1–18.Google Scholar
Neves, L.M., Teixeira, T.P. and Araújo, F.G. (2011) Structure and dynamics of distinct fish assemblages in three reaches (upper, middle and lower) of an open tropical estuary in Brazil. Marine Ecology 32, 115–131.Google Scholar
Noleto, R.B., Vicari, M.R., Cestari, M.M. and Artoni, R.F. (2012) Variable B chromosomes frequencies between males and females of two species of pufferfishes (Tetraodontiformes). Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 22, 343–349.Google Scholar
Oziolor, E.M. and Matson, C.W. (2015) Evolutionary toxicology: population adaptation in response to anthropogenic pollution. In Riesch, R., Tobler, M. and Plath, M. (eds) Extremophile fishes: ecology, evolution, and physiology of teleosts in extreme environments. Basel: Springer International Publishing, pp. 247–277.Google Scholar
Paranhos, R. and Mayr, L.M. (1993) Seasonal patterns of temperature and salinity in Guanabara Bay. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 2, 647–652.Google Scholar
Pereira, E., Baptista-Neto, J.A., Smith, B.J. and McAllister, J.J. (2007) The contribution of heavy metal pollution derived from highway runoff to Guanabara Bay sediments – Rio de Janeiro/Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 79, 739–750.Google Scholar
Pessanha, A.L.M. and Araújo, F.G. (2003) Spatial, temporal and diel variations of fish assemblages in two sandy beaches in the Sepetiba Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57, 817–828.Google Scholar
Pinkas, L., Oliphant, M.S. and Iverson, I.L.K. (1971) Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna and bonito in California waters. California Department of Fish and Game–Fish Bulletin 152, 1–105.Google Scholar
Queiroz, G.M.L.N., Spach, H.L., Sobolewski-Morelos, M., Santos, L.O. and Schwarz-Junior, R. (2006) Caracterização da ictiofauna demersal de duas áreas do complexo estuarino de Paranaguá, Paraná, Brasil. Biociências 14, 112–124.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, C.H.A. and Kjerfve, B. (2002) Anthropogenic influence on the water quality in Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Regional Environmental Change 3, 13–19.Google Scholar
Rocha, C., Favaro, L.F. and Spach, H.L. (2002) Biologia reprodutiva de Sphoeroides testudineus (Linnaeus) (Pisces, Osteichthyes, Tetraodontidae) da gamboa do Baguaçu, Baía de Paranaguá, Paraná, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 19, 57–63.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, C., Lavrado, H.P., Falcão, A.P.C. and Silva, S.H.G. (2007) Distribuição da ictiofauna capturada em arrastos de fundo na Baia de Guanabara – Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Arquivos do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro 65, 199–210.Google Scholar
Rooker, J.R., Turner, J.P. and Holt, S.A. (2006) Trophic ecology of Sargassum-associated fishes in the Gulf of Mexico determined from stable isotopes and fatty acids. Marine Ecology Progress Series 313, 249–259.Google Scholar
Rosas-Alayola, J., Hernández-Herrera, A., Galvan-Magaña, F., Abitia-Cárdenas, L.A. and Muhlia-Melo, A.F. (2002) Diet composition of sailfish (Istiophorus platypterus) from the southern Gulf of California, Mexico. Fisheries Research 57, 185–195.Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, N., Lehnert, K., Kaffarnik, S., Torres, J.P.M., Vianna, M. and Vetter, W. (2012) Thorough analysis of polyhalogenated compounds in ray liver samples off the coast of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 19, 379–389.Google Scholar
Santini, F., Sorenson, L. and Alfaro, M.E. (2013) A new phylogeny of tetraodontiform fishes (Tetraodontiformes, Acanthomorpha) based on 22 loci. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69, 177–187.Google Scholar
Santos, A.C.A. and Rodriguez, F.N.C. (2011) Ocorrência e alimentação do baiacu Sphoeroides testudineus (Actinopterygii – Tetraodontiformes) na margem oeste da Baía de Todos os Santos, Bahia, Brasil. Sitientibus 11, 31–36.Google Scholar
Schärer, M.T., Nemeth, M.I. and Appeldoorn, R.S. (2009) Protecting multi-species spawning aggregation at Mona Island, Puerto Rico. In Proceedings of the 62nd Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, Cumana, Venezuela, 2–6 November 2009, pp. 252–259.Google Scholar
Schultz, Y.D., Favaro, L.F. and Spach, H.L. (2002) Aspectos reprodutivos de Sphoeroides greeleyi (Gilbert), Pisces, Osteichthyes, Tetraodontidae, da gamboa do Baguaçu, Baía De Paranaguá, Paraná, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 19, 65–76.Google Scholar
Selleslagh, J. and Amara, R. (2008) Environmental factors structuring fish composition and assemblages in a small macrotidal estuary (eastern English Channel). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 79, 507–517.Google Scholar
Shipp, R.L. (2003) Tetraodontidae. Puffers. In Carpenter, K.E. (ed.) The living marine resources of the Western Central Atlantic. Vol. 3: Bony fishes part 2 (Opistognathidae to Molidae), sea turtles and marine mammals. FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization, pp. 1988–2006.Google Scholar
Sibunka, J.D. and Pacheco, A.L. (1981) Biological and fisheries data on northern puffer, Sphoeroides maculatus (Bloch and Schneider). US National Marine Fisheries Service. Technical Paper 26, 59 pp.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Silva, F.S., Pereira, D.C., Nuñez, L.S., Krepsk, N., Fontana, L.F., Neto, J.A.B. and Crapez, M.A.C. (2008) Bacteriological study of the superficial sediments of Guanabara Bay, RJ, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 56, 13–22.Google Scholar
Silva-Júnior, D.R., Carvalho, D.M.T. and Vianna, M. (2013) The catfish Genidens genidens (Cuvier, 1829) as a potential sentinel species in Brazilian estuarine waters. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 29, 1297–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Júnior, D.R., Gomes, V.S., Linde-Arias, A.R. and Vianna, M. (2012) Metallothionein in the pond perch Diplectrum radiale (Teleostei) as a biomarker of pollution in Guanabara Bay estuary, Brazil. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Ecotoxicology 7, 83–88.Google Scholar
Sommer, C., Schneider, W. and Poutiers, J.M. (1996) FAO species identification field guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of Somalia. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization, 376 pp.Google Scholar
Sosa-López, A., Mouillot, D., Ramos-Miranda, J., Flores-Hernandez, D. and Do Chi, T. (2007) Fish species richness decreases with salinity in tropical coastal lagoons. Journal of Biogeography 34, 52–61.Google Scholar
Spach, H.L., Santos, C. and Godefroid, R.S. (2003) Padrões temporais na assembléia de peixes na gamboa do Sucuriú, Baia de Paranaguá, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 20, 591–600.Google Scholar
Sturges, H. (1926) The choice of a class-interval. Journal of the American Statistics Association 21, 65–66.Google Scholar
Suguio, K. (1973) Introdução a Sedimentologia. São Paulo: Edgar Blücher/EDUSP.Google Scholar
Valentin, J.L., Tenenbaum, D.R., Bonecker, A., Bonecker, S., Nogueira, C., Paranhos, R. and Villac, M.C. (1999) Caractéristiques hydrobiologiques de la Baie de Guanabara (Rio de Janeiro, Brésil). Journal de Rechèrche Océanographique 24, 33–41.Google Scholar
Vega-Cendejas, M.E. and Santillana, M.H. (2004) Fish community structure and dynamics in a coastal hypersaline lagoon: Rio Lagartos, Yucatan, Mexico. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 60, 285–299.Google Scholar
Vianna, M. and Almeida, T. (2005) Bony fish bycatch in the southern Brazil pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis) fishery. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 48, 611–623.Google Scholar
Vilar, C.C., Spach, H.L. and Souza-Conceição, J.M. (2011) Fish assemblage in shallow areas of Baía da Babitonga, southern Brazil: structure, spatial and temporal patterns. Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences 6, 303–319.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A., Pilcher, W. and Champlin, D. (2012) Common mechanism underlies repeated evolution of extreme pollution tolerance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279, 427–433.Google Scholar
Whitfield, A.K. and Harrison, T.D. (2003) River flow and fish abundance in South African estuary. Journal of Fish Biology 62, 1467–1472.Google Scholar
Wootton, R.J. (1998) Ecology of teleost fishes, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Zapfe, G.A. and Lyczkowski-Shultz, J. (2006) Monacanthidae: filefishes. In Richards, W.J. (ed.). Early stages of Atlantic fishes: an identification guide for the Western Central North Atlantic, Volume 2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 2399–2428.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar