Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:03:07.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Habitat preference and seasonal variability of epifaunal assemblages associated with macroalgal beds on the Central Red Sea coast, Saudi Arabia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

M. A. Ba-Akdah ,
S. Satheesh  and
A. A. Al-Sofyani
M. A. Ba-Akdah
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
S. Satheesh*
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
A. A. Al-Sofyani
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:S. Satheesh, Department of Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia email: ssathianeson@kau.edu.sa satheesh_s2005@yahoo.co.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Macroalgal communities of coastal ecosystems play a key role in maintaining overall coastal biodiversity. In this study, habitat preference (macroalgal host preference) and temporal changes (season) of epifaunal communities associated to five macroalgal species such as Padina, Sargassum, Ulva, Acanthophora and Gracilaria were observed at seasonal intervals (summer and winter) for 2 years from May 2012 to March 2014 on the Jeddah coastal waters of the Red Sea. Major epifaunal groups observed included polychaetes, amphipods, isopods, gastropods, mussels and crabs. Polychaetes were represented by 10 species followed by amphipods with five species. The abundance of gastropods, polychaetes and mussels showed significant variation between the macroalgae irrespective of morphology. Generally, the abundance of these taxa were high on Padina and low on Sargassum. Significant seasonal changes were observed on the abundance of polychaetes, amphipods and isopods. The abundance of some epifaunal groups showed a significant relationship with environmental parameters such as surface water temperature, salinity, pH and dissolved oxygen content.

Keywords

Coastal biodiversityepifaunaepibiosisseaweedsbiogenic habitatsRed Seamarine invertebrates
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 96 , Issue 7 , November 2016 , pp. 1457 - 1467
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Al-Aidaroos, A.M. and Satheesh, S. (2014) Larval development and settlement of the barnacle Amphibalanus amphitrite from the Red Sea: influence of nauplii hatching season. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 43, 17–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Farawati, R. (2010) Environmental conditions of the coastal waters of Southern Corinche, Jeddah, Eastern Red Sea: physico-chemical approach. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 4, 3324–3337.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. (1988) Factors affecting population fluctuations of caprellid amphipods inhabiting Sargassum patens bed (preliminary report). Benthos Research 32, 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, C.R. (2009) Host taxonomic relatedness and functional-group affiliation as predictors of seaweed–invertebrate epifaunal associations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 387, 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belal, A.A. and Ghobashy, M.A.F.A. (2014) Macrobenthic invertebrates in the intertidal zone at both sides of the Suez Gulf. International Journal of Marine Science 4, 1–11.Google Scholar
Bologna, P.A.X. and Heck, K.L. Jr (1999) Macrofaunal associations with seagrass epiphytes. Relative importance of trophic and structural characteristics. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 242, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, R.N. and Ebeling, A.W. (1975) Food, activity, and habitat of three ‘picker-type’ microcarnivorous fishes in the kelp forests off Santa Barbara, California. Fishery Bulletin 73, 815–829.Google Scholar
Brawley, S. H. and Fei, X.G. (1987) Studies of mesoherbivory in aquaria and in an unbarricaded mariculture farm on the Chinese coast. Journal of Phycology 23, 614–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacabelos, E., Olabarria, C., Incera, M., Jesús, S. and Troncoso, J.S. (2010) Effects of habitat structure and tidal height on epifaunal assemblages associated with macroalgae. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 89, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caine, E.A. (1977) Feeding mechanisms and possible resource partitioning of the Caprellidae (Crustacea : Amphipoda) from Puget Sound, USA. Marine Biology 42, 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caine, E.A. (1991) Caprellid amphipods: fast food for the reproductively active. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 148, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantin, N.E., Cohen, A.L., Karnauskas, K.B., Tarrant, A.M. and McCorkle, D.C. (2010) Ocean warming slows coral growth in the central Red Sea. Science 329, 322–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chemello, R. and Milazzo, M. (2002) Effect of algal architecture on associated fauna: some evidence from phytal molluscs. Marine Biology 140, 981–990.Google Scholar
Christie, H., Fredriksen, S. and Rind, E. (1998) Regrowth of kelp and colonization of epiphyte and fauna community after kelp trawling at the coast of Norway. Hydrobiologia 375/376, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, H., Jorgensen, N.M., Norderhaug, K.M. and Waage-Nielsen, E. (2003) Species distribution and habitat exploration of fauna associated with the kelp (Laminaria hyperborea) along the Norwegian coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 687–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunha, T.J., Güth, A. Z., Bromberg, S. and Sumida, P.Y.G. (2013) Macrofauna associated with the brown algae Dictyota spp. (Phaeophyceae, Dictyotaceae) in the Sebastião Gomes Reef and Abrolhos Archipelago, Bahia, Brazil. Continental Shelf Research 70, 140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, C.M. (2002) The future of seagrass meadows. Environmental Conservation 29, 192–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J.E. and Hay, M.E. (1991) Food and shelter as determinants of food choice by an herbivorous marine amphipod. Ecology 72, 1286–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J.M. (1990) Amphipods on seaweeds: partners or pests? Oecologia 83, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edgar, G.J. (1991) Distribution patterns of mobile epifauna associated with rope fibre habitats within the Bathurst Harbour estuary, South-western Tasmania. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 33, 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A.J. and Head, S.M. (1987) Key environments: Red Sea. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
El-Sherbiny, M.M., Hanafy, M.H. and Aamer, M.A. (2007) Monthly variation in abundance and species composition of the epipelagic zooplankton off Sharm El-Sheikh, Northern Red Sea. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences 1, 200–210.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, S., Christie, H. and Saethre, B.A. (2005) Species richness in macroalgae and macrofauna assemblages on Fucus serratus L. (Phaeophyceae) and Zostera marina L. (Angiospermae) in Skagerrak, Norway. Marine Biology Research 1, 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fusetani, N. (2004) Biofouling and antifouling. Natural Product Reports 21, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gestoso, I., Olabarria, C. and Troncoso, J.S. (2010) Variability of epifaunal assemblages associated with native and invasive macroalgae. Marine and Freshwater Research 61, 724–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, S.J. and Hartnoll, R.G. (1983) Grazing of intertidal algae by marine invertebrates. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 21, 195–282.Google Scholar
Hicks, G.R.F. (1980) Structure of phytal harpacticoid copepod assemblages and the influence of habitat complexity and turbidity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 44, 157–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, E.S. and Chess, J.R. (1976) Trophic interactions among fishes and zooplankters near shore at Santa Catalina Island, California. Fishery Bulletin 74, 567–598.Google Scholar
Holmlund, M.B., Peterson, C.H. and Hay, M.E. (1990) Does algal morphology affect amphipod susceptibility to fish predation? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 139, 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, C.M. and Langevin, R. (1996) Habitat geometry of benthic substrata: effects on arrival and settlement of mobile epifauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 206, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. and Thornber, C.S. (2010) Effects of habitat-modifying invasive macroalgae on epiphytic algal communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 400, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G.P. (1988) Ecology of rocky reef fish of north-eastern New Zealand a review. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 22, 445–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, S.C.K. and Qian, P.Y. (1997) Phlorotannins and related compounds as larval settlement inhibitors of the tube-building polychaete Hydroides elegans . Marine Ecology Progress Series 159, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leninraj, Y., Satheesh, S. and Wesley, S.G. (2007) Biodiversity of epifauna associated with Sargassum sp. around Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project, East coast of India. In Director – Zoological Survey of India (ed.) National symposium on conservation and valuation of marine biodiversity. Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India Publications Division, pp. 219–230.Google Scholar
Le Lann, K., Jegou, C. and Stiger-Pouvreau, V. (2008) Effect of different conditioning treatments on total phenolic content and antioxidant activities in two Sargassacean species: comparison of the frondose Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt and the cylindrical Bifurcaria bifurcata R. Ross. Phycological Research 56, 238–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, F.P.P., Tanaka, M.O. and Gebara, R.S. (2007) Structural variation in the brown alga Sargassum cymosum and its effects on associated amphipod assemblages. Brazilian Journal of Biology 67, 215–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maurer, D.L., Leathem, W., Kinner, P. and Tinsman, J. (1979) Seasonal fluctuations in coastal benthic invertebrate assemblages. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 8, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAleece, N., Gage, J.D.G., Lambshead, P.J.D. and Paterson, G.L.J. (1997) BioDiversity. Professional statistics analysis software. http://www.sams.ac.uk/peter-lamont/biodiversity-pro#sthash.Yl8MCaFl.dpuf Google Scholar
Moore, P.G. (1978) Turbidity and kelp holdfast. Amphipoda. I. Wales and S.W. England. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 32, 53–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paiva, P.C. (1993) Trophic structure of a shelf polychaete taxocoenosis in southern Brazil. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 35, 39–55.Google Scholar
Raitsos, D.E., Hoteit, I., Prihartato, P.K., Chronis, T., Triantafyllou, G. and Abualnaja, Y. (2011) Abrupt warming of the Red Sea. Geophysical Research Letters 38, L14601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D.A., Johnston, E.L. and Poore, A.G.B. (2008) Contamination of marine biogenic habitats and effects upon associated epifauna. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56, 1057–1065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roland, W. (1978) Feeding behaviour of the kelp clingfish Rimicola muscarum residing on the kelp Macrocystis integrifolia . Canadian Journal of Zoology 56, 711–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satheesh, S. and Wesley, S.G. (2006) Polychaetes associated with the brown algae Sargassum spp. in Kudankulam waters, East coast of India. Ecology Environment and Conservation 13, 321–324.Google Scholar
Shaikh, E.A., Roff, J.C. and Dowidar, N.M. (1986) Phytoplankton ecology and production in the Red Sea off Jiddah, Saudi Arabia. Marine Biology 92, 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stachowicz, J.J. (2001) Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. Bioscience 51, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, P.D., DeNys, R. and Kjelleberg, S. (1998) Chemical inhibition of epibiota by Australian seaweeds. Biofouling 12, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoner, A.W. and Lewis, F.G. (1985) The influence of quantitative and qualitative aspects of habitat complexity in tropical seagrass meadows. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 94, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tararam, A.S. and Wakabara, Y. (1981) The mobile fauna especially Gammaridea of Sargassum cymosum . Marine Ecology Progress Series 5, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R.B. (1998) Seasonal variation in assemblages of mobile epifauna inhabiting three subtidal brown seaweeds in northeastern New Zealand. Hydrobiologia 361, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R.B. and Cole, R.G. (1994) Mobile epifauna on subtidal brown seaweeds in northeastern New Zealand. Marine Ecology Progress Series 115, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrush, S.F. and Dayton, P.K. (2002) Disturbance to marine benthic habitats by trawling and dredging: implications for marine biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 33, 449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazquez-Luis, M., Sanchez-Jerez, P. and Bayle-Sempere, J.T. (2008) Changes in amphipod (Crustacea) assemblages associated with shallow-water algal habitats invaded by Caulerpa racemosa var.cylindracea in the western Mediterranean Sea. Marine Environmental Research 65, 416–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venugopalan, V.K. and Paulpandian, A.L. (1989) Methods in hydrobiology. Parangipettai: C.A.S. in Marine Biology, Annamalai University.Google Scholar
Viejo, R.M. (1999) Mobile epifauna inhabiting the invasive Sargassum muticum and two local seaweeds in northern Spain. Aquatic Botany 64, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, M. (1989) Marine epibiosis. 1. Fouling and antifouling; some basic aspects. Marine Ecology Progress Series 58, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikström, S.A. and Kautsky, L. (2004) Invasion of a habitat-forming seaweed: effects on associated biota. Biological Invasions 6, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, R., Gibson, R. and Harrington, J. (1979) Herbivory and detritivory among gammaridean amphipods from a Florida seagrass community. Marine Biology 54, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar