Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:51:25.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identifying deep-sea megafaunal epibenthic assemblages for use in habitat mapping and marine protected area network design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

K.L. Howell ,
J.S. Davies  and
B.E. Narayanaswamy
K.L. Howell*
Affiliation:
School of Marine Science and Engineering, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL48AA
J.S. Davies
Affiliation:
School of Marine Science and Engineering, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL48AA
B.E. Narayanaswamy
Affiliation:
The Scottish Association for Marine Science, Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, Oban, Argyll, PA37 1QA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: K.L. Howell, School of Marine Science and Engineering, University of Plymouth Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL48AA email: kerry.howell@plymouth.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

International efforts are currently being made to establish networks of marine protected areas (MPAs) for the purposes of conservation of marine biodiversity. One of the primary objectives of MPA networks is to achieve representation of all marine biological diversity. Since we do not know the extent of biological diversity nor its distribution and function, we use surrogates to represent biological diversity. At a broad scale, measures of the physical environment are used, however at a fine scale biological assemblages have been shown to provide better representation of known biological diversity. While there are well known descriptions of assemblages for shallow water environments, few such descriptions of deep-sea benthic assemblages have been attempted. This paper provides descriptions of deep-sea epibenthic megafaunal assemblages based on a broad-scale video and stills image survey of the upper bathyal (200–1000 m) regions of the Rockall Trough and eastern Faroe–Shetland Channel. One thousand nine hundred and eighty-seven images were analysed from 139 video transects sampled from Dangaard and Explorer Canyons, Rosemary Bank Seamount, Hatton Bank, Wyville-Thomson Ridge, and the continental slope west and north-west of Shetland. Quantitative data obtained were analysed using cluster analysis and SIMPER analysis in Primer V.6 to identify benthic assemblages and their characterizing species. Thirty-one epibenthic megafaunal assemblages are defined by their characterizing species, and their distribution in terms of site, depth, temperature and substratum type. These 31 ‘biotopes’ provide consistent units for use in biological mapping efforts and assessments of representativeness in MPA network design. To facilitate the incorporation of these biotopes into existing deep-sea classification systems the biotopes have been assigned to broad substratum types. This is consistent with the use of substratum as a surrogate in many existing systems.

Keywords

videohabitat mappinghabitat classificationmarine protected areasdeep seamegafaunaseamountsepibenthicbiotopes
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 33 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allee, R.J., Dethier, M., Brown, D., Deegan, L., Ford, G.R., Hourigan, T.R., Maragos, J., Schoch, C., Sealy, K., Twilley, R., Weinstein, M.P. and Yoklavich, M. (2001) Marine and Estuarine Ecosystem and Habitat Classification. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum. Silver Spring, Maryland, NMFS-F/SPO-43, 43 pp.Google Scholar
Axelsson, M.B. (2003) The deep seabed environment of the UK continental margin—integration and interpretation of geological and biological data. PhD thesis. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Bett, B.J. (2001) UK–Atlantic margin environmental survey: introduction and overview of bathyal benthic ecology. Continental Shelf Research 21, 917–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIOFAR Proceeding. (2005) North-east Atlantic marine benthic organisms in the Faroes—taxonomy, distribution and ecology. Biofar symposium, Tórshavn, 24–26 April 2003. Annales Societatis Scientiarum Faroensis Supplementum XXXXI, 272 pp.Google Scholar
Boersma, P.D. and Parrish, J.K. (1999) Limiting abuse: marine protected areas, a limited solution. Ecological Economics 31, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, A., Harris, P.T., Lyne, V., Heap, A., Passlow, V.L. and Smith, R.N.P. (2001) An interim, draft bioregionalisation for the continental slope and deeper waters of the South-East Marine Region of Australia. Hobart: National Oceans Office, Geoscience Australia and CSIRO, 35 pp.Google Scholar
Cartes, J.E., Company, J.B. and Maynou, F. (1994) Deep-water decapod crustacean communities in the north-western Mediterranean: influence of submarine canyons and season. Marine Biology 120, 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edition. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Connor, D.W., Allen, J.H., Golding, N., Howell, K.L., Lieberknecht, L.M., Northen, K.O. and Reker, J.B. (2004) The Marine Habitat Classification for Britain and Ireland Version 04.05. Peterborough: JNCC. ISBN 1 861 07561 8 (internet version) available from www.jncc.gov.uk/MarineHabitatClassificationGoogle Scholar
Cranmer, G.J. (1985) Recent investigations into the distribution of regular echinoids in the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 65, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cripps, S. and Christiansen, S. (2001) A strategic approach to protecting areas on the high-seas. In Thiel, H. and Koslow, J.A. (eds) Proceedings of the Expert Workshop held at the International Academy for Nature Conservation Isle of Vilm, Germany, 27 February–4 March 2001. Bonn: German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, pp. 113–121.Google Scholar
Davies, C.E. and Moss, D. (1999) EUNIS habitat classification. Final report to the European Topic Centre on Nature Conservation. Paris: European Environment Agency, 256 pp.Google Scholar
Davies, C.E., Moss, D. and Hill, M.O. (2004) EUNIS Habitat Classification Revised 2004. Report to the European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity. Paris: European Environment Agency, 307 pp.Google Scholar
Davies, A.J., Roberts, J.M. and Hall-Spencer, J. (2007) Preserving deep-sea natural heritage: emerging issues in offshore conservation and management. Biological Conservation 138, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duineveld, G., Lavaleye, M., Berghuis, E. and De Wilde, P. (2001) Activity and composition of the benthic fauna in the Whittard Canyon and the adjacent continental slope (NE Atlantic). Oceanologica Acta 24, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, M.F., Fry, W.G., Fry, P.D. and Cranmer, G.J.A. (1982) A series of North Sea benthos surveys with trawl and headline camera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 62, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellett, D.J., Edwards, A. and Bowers, R. (1986) The hydrography of the Rockall Channel—an overview. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 88B, 61–81.Google Scholar
Foubert, A., Beck, T., Wheeler, A.J., Opderbecke, J., Grehan, A., Klages, M., Thiede, J. and Henriet, J.P. (2005) New view of the Belgica Mounds, Porcupine Seabight, NE Atlantic, preliminary results from the Polarstern ARK-XIX/3a ROV cruise. In Freiwald, A. and Roberts, J.M. (eds) Cold-water corals and ecosystems. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 535–569.Google Scholar
Freiwald, A. (2002) Reef-forming cold-water corals. In Wefer, G., Billett, D., Hebbein, D., Jorgensen, B.B., Schluter, M. and Van Weering, T. (eds) Ocean margin systems. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiwald, A., Fossa, J.H., Grehan, A., Koslow, T. and Roberts, J.M. (2004) Cold-water coral reefs, out of sight—no longer out of mind. United Nations Environment Programme—World Conservation Monitoring Centre Report, Biodiversity Series 22, 84 pp.Google Scholar
Gage, J.D. (1986) The benthic fauna of the Rockall Trough: regional distribution and bathymetric zonation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 88B, 159–174.Google Scholar
Gage, J.D. (2001). Deep-sea benthic community and environmental impact assessment at the Atlantic Frontier. Continental Shelf Research 21, 957–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjerde, K.M. and Breide, C. (2003) Towards a strategy for High Seas Marine Protected Areas, Proceedings of the IUCN, WCPA and WWF Experts Workshop on High Seas Marine Protected Areas, 15–17 January 2003, Malaga, Spain. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 80 pp.Google Scholar
Glémarec, M. (1973) The benthic communities of the European North Atlantic continental shelf. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 11, 263–289.Google Scholar
Glover, A.G. and Smith, S.R. (2003) The deep-sea floor ecosystem, current status and prospectus of anthropogenic change by the year 2025. Environmental Conservation 30, 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, H.G., Yoklavich, M.M., Starr, R.M., O'Connell, V.M., Wakefield, W.W., Sullivan, D.E., McRea, J.E. and Cailliet, G.M. (1999) A classification scheme for deep seafloor habitats. Ocenaologica Acta 22, 663–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P.T. (2007). Application of geophysical information to the design of a representative system of marine protected areas in southeastern Australia. In Todd, B.J. and Greene, H.G. (eds) Mapping the seafloor for habitat characterization. Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 47, pp. 463–481.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1996) Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta [Annelida, bristleworms, Polychaeta]. 2nd revised edition. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 648 pp.Google Scholar
Headrich, R.L., Rowe, G.T. and Polloni, P.T. (1975) Zonation and faunal composition of epibenthic populations on the continental slope of New England. Journal of Marine Research 33, 191–212.Google Scholar
Hecker, B., Logan, D.T., Gandarillas, F.E. and Gibson, P.R. (1988) Canyon and slope processes study. Volume 3: Biological processes. Washington, DC: United States Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service, 210 pp.Google Scholar
Huvenne, V.A.I., Beyer, A., de Haas, H., Dekindt, K., Henriet, J.P., Kozachenko, M., Olu-Le Roy, K. and Wheeler, A.J. (2005) The seabed appearance of different coral bank provinces in the Porcupine Seabight, NE Atlantic, results from sidescan sonar and ROV seabed mapping. In Freiwald, A. and Roberts, J.M. (eds) Cold-water corals and ecosystems. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 535–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN. (1994) Guidelines for Protected Areas Management Categories. Cambridge: International Union for Conservation of Nature, 261 pp.Google Scholar
Jones, N.S. (1950) Marine bottom communities. Biological Reviews 25, 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, N.S. (1951) The bottom fauna of the south of the Isle of Man. Journal of Animal Ecology 20, 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D.O.B., Bett, B.J. and Tyler, P.A. (2007) Megabenthic ecology of the Faroe–Shetland channel: a photographic study. Deep-Sea Research Part I Oceanographic Research Papers 54, 1111–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelleher, G., Bleakley, C. and Wells, S. (1995) A Global Representative System of Marine Protected Areas. Volume 1: Antarctic, Arctic, Mediterranean, Northwest Atlantic, Northeast Atlantic and Baltic. Washington, DC: The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, The World Bank and the World Conservation Union (IUCN), 219 pp.Google Scholar
Klitgaard, A.B., Tendal, O.S. and Westerberg, H. (1997) Mass occurrence of large sponges (Porifera) in Faroe Island (NE Atlantic) shelf and slope areas: characteristics, distribution and possible causes. In Hawkins, L.E. and Hutchins, S. (eds) The responses of marine organisms to their environments. Southampton: Southampton Oceanographic Centre, University of Southampton, pp 129–142Google Scholar
Klitgaard, A.B. and Tendal, O.S. (2004) Distribution and species composition of mass occurrences of large-sized sponges in the northeast Atlantic. Progress in Oceanography 61, 57–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubier, L. and Monniot, C. (1985) Les peuplements profonds du golfe de Gascogne, Campagnes BIOGAS. Brest: Ifremer, 630 pp.Google Scholar
Lavaleye, M.S.S., Duineveld, G.C.A., Berghuis, E.M. and Witbaard, R. (2002) A comparison between the megafauna communities on the NW Iberian and Celtic continental margins—effects of coastal upwelling? Progress in Oceanography 52, 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Danois, E. (1948) Les profondeurs de la mer, trente ans de recherches sur la faune sous-marine au large des côtes de France. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Mackie, A.S.Y. (1990) Offshore benthic communities of the Irish Sea. In Irish Sea Study Group (ed.) The Irish Sea: an environmental review. Part 1: nature conservation. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press for Irish Sea Study Group, pp. 169–218.Google Scholar
Madden, C.J., Goodin, C.K., Allee, B., Finkbeiner, M. and Bamford, D. (2008) Coastal and marine ecological classification standard. NOAA and, natureserve, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Mortensen, P.B., Hovland, M., Brattegard, T. and Farestveit, R. (1995) Deep water bioherms of the scleractinian coral Lophelia pertusa (L.) at 64°N on the Norwegian shelf: structure and associated megafauna. Sarsia 80, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawsey, E.L. and Davis, F.M. (1924) Report on exploratory voyages to Lousy Bank and adjacent areas. Fishery Investigations (London) series II 7, 1–22.Google Scholar
Petersen, C.G.J. (1913) Valuation of the Sea II. The animal communities of the sea bottom and importance for marine zoogeography. Report of the Danish Biological Station 21, 144 pp.Google Scholar
Petersen, C.G.J. (1918) The sea bottom and its production of fish food. A survey of the work done in connection with valuation of the Denmark waters from 1883–1917. Report of the Danish Biological Station 25, 1–62.Google Scholar
Rice, A.L., Tyler, P.A. and Paterson, G.J.L. (1992) The pennatulacean Kophobelemnon stelliferum (Cnidaria: Octocorallia) in the Porcupine Seabight (north-east Atlantic Ocean). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 72, 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roff, J.C. and Taylor, M.E. (2000) National frameworks for marine conservation—a hierarchical geophysical approach. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 10, 209–223.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, G.T. (1971) Observations on bottom currents and epibenthic populations in Hatteras Submarine Canyon. Deep-Sea Research 18, 569–581.Google Scholar
Sarda, F., Cartes, J.E. and Company, J.B. (1994) Spatio-temporal variations in megabenthos abundance in three different habitats of the Catalan deep-sea (western Mediterranean). Marine Biology 120, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlacher, T.A., Schlacher-Hoenlinger, M.A., Williams, A., Althaus, F., Hooper, J.N.A. and Kloser, R. (2007) Richness and distribution of sponge megabenthos in continental margin canyons off southeastern Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 340, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scovazzi, T. (2004) Marine protected areas on the high seas: some legal and policy considerations. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 19, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, D.L., Tissot, B.N., Hixon, M.A. and Barss, W. (1992) Fish habitat associations on a deep reef at the edge of the Oregon continental shelf. Fishery Bulletin 90, 540–551.Google Scholar
Stevens, T. (2002) Rigor and representativeness in marine protected area design. Coastal Management 30, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, T. and Connolly, R.M. (2004) Testing the utility of abiotic surrogates for marine habitat mapping at scales relevant to management. Biological Conservation 119, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussbach, S. and Breckner, A. (1911) Die Seeigel, Seesterne and Schlangensterne der Nord- und Ostsee. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen der Kommission zur Wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der Deutschen Meere. Abteilung Kiel. N.S. 12, 167–300.Google Scholar
Turrell, W.R., Slesser, G., Adams, R.D., Payne, R. and Gillibrand, P.A. (1999) Decadal variability in the composition of Faroe Shetland Channel bottom water. Deep-Sea Research 46, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hoey, G., Guilini, K., Rabaut, M., Vincx, M. and Degraer, S. (2008) Ecological implications of the presence of the tube building polychaete Lanice conchilega on the soft-bottom benthic ecosystems. Marine Biology 154, 1009–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, E.W. and Dayton, P.K. (1999) Organic enrichment by macrophyte detritus, and abundance patterns of megafaunal populations in submarine canyons. Marine Ecology Progress Series 186, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T.J., Vanderklift, M.A., Nicholls, A.O. and Kenchington, R.A. (1999) Selecting marine reserves using habitats and species assemblages as surrogates for biological diversity. Ecological Applications 9, 691–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wentworth, C.K. (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. Journal of Geology 30, 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, A.J., Beck, T., Thiede, J., Klages, M., Grehan, A., Monteys, F.X. and Polarstern ARK XIX/3a Shipboard Party. (2005a) Deep-water coral mounds on the Porcupine Bank, Irish margin, preliminary results from Polarstern ARK-XIX/3a ROV cruise. In Freiwald, A. and Roberts, J.M. (eds.) Cold-water corals and ecosystems. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, A.J., Bett, B.J., Billett, D.S.M., Masson, D.G. and Mayor, D. (2005b) The impact of demersal trawling on NE Atlantic deep-water coral habitats: the case of Darwin Mounds, UK. In Barnes, P. and Thomas, J. (eds) Benthic habitats and the effects of fishing. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society, Symposium 41, pp 807–818Google Scholar
Wheeler, A.J., Beyer, A., Freiwald, A., De Haas, H., Huvenne, V.A.I., Kozachenko, M., Olu-Le Roy, K. and Opderbecke, J. (2007) Morphology and environment of cold-water coral carbonate mounds on the NW European margin. International Journal of Earth Sciences 96, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wienberg, C., Beuck, L., Heidkamp, S., Hebbeln, D., Freiwald, A., Pfannkuche, O. and Monteys, X. (2008) Franken Mound: facies and biocoenoses on a newly-discovered ‘carbonate mound’ on the western Rockall Bank, NE Atlantic. Facies 54, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, W., Goethals, P., Van den Eynde, D., Van Hoey, G., Van Lancker, V., Verfaillie, E., Vincx, M. and Degraer, S. (2008) Where is the worm? Predictive modelling of the habitat preferences of the tube-building polychaete Lanice conchilega (Pallas, 1766). Ecological Modelling 212, 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., Bax, N.J., Kloser, R.J., Althaus, F., Barker, B. and Keith, G. (2009) Australia's deep-water reserve network: implications of false homogeneity for classifying abiotic surrogates of biodiversity. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66, 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoklavich, M.M., Greene, H.G., Cailliet, G.M., Sullivan, D.E., Lea, R.N. and Love, M.S. (2000) Habitat associations of deep-water rockfishes in a submarine canyon: an example of a natural refuge. Fishery Bulletin US 98, 625–641.Google Scholar