Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:53:00.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The incidence of autotomy in an estuarine population of the crab Carcinus maenas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Alistair McVean  and
Ian Findlay
Alistair McVean
Affiliation:
Bedford College, University of London, Regent's Park, London
Ian Findlay
Affiliation:
Bedford College, University of London, Regent's Park, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The incidence of autotomy is described for a discrete population of Carcinus maenas in the Yealm Estuary over a period of one year. During this time the crabs showed seasonal trends in distribution whereby during the summer months they congregated at the top of the estuary. This seasonal migration up and down the estuary corresponded with peak rates in the rate of change in temperature of the bottom water. Recruitment occurred in June, July and August. Overall, there were more female than male crabs although the ratio varied throughout the year. All sizes and sexes of crabs autotomized limbs but although autotomy increased with the size of the crabs it showed no obvious relationship with other population parameters. Significantly more chelipeds than walking limbs were lost. There were more multiple autotomies than would be expected if autotomy was a random event. Autotomy is shown to be a rare event for sexually mature Carcinus but essential to the survival of immature crabs. The means by which crabs may regulate the incidence of autotomy is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , May 1979 , pp. 341 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, R. J. A. & Parsons, A. J. 1973. Seasonal patterns of migration and locomotor rhythmicity in population of Carcinus. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 7, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassie, R. M., 1954. Some uses of probability paper in the analysis of size frequency distributions. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 5, 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crothers, J. H., 1967. The biology of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas (L.). Field Studies, 2, 407–534.Google Scholar
Easton, D. M., 1972. Autotomy of walking legs in the Pacific shore crab, Hemigrapsus oregonensis. Journal of Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 1, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, I., 1978. The role of the cuticular stress detector, CSD13 in locomotion and limb autotomy in the crab Carcinus maenas. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 125, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, I. & McVean, A. R., 1977. The nervous control of limb autotomy in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus (L.) and the role of the cuticular stress detector, CSD1 Journal of Experi-mental Biology, 70, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredericq, L., 1892. Nouvelles recherches sur l'autotomie chez le crabe. Archives de biologie, 12, 169–197.Google Scholar
McVean, A. R., 1974. The nervous control of autotomy in Carcinus maenas. Journal of Experi-mental Biology, 60, 423–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McVean, A. R., 1975. Autotomy. Mini-review. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 51A, 497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVean, A. R., 1976. The incidence of autotomy in Carcinus maenas (L.). Journal of Experi-mental Marine Biology and Ecology, 24, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVean, A. R. & Findlay, I., 1976. Autotomy in Carcinus maenas: the role of the basi-ischiopodite posterior levator muscles. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 110, 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, E., 1962. Seasonal changes in a population of Carcinus maenas L. in the littoral zone. Journal of Animal Ecology, 31, 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, E. & Atkinson, R. J. A., 1972. Pressure and the rhythmic behaviour of inshore marine animals. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 26, 395–416.Google ScholarPubMed
Needham, A. E., 1953. The incidence and adaptive view of autotomy and regeneration in Crustacea. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 169, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, J., 1915. A comparative study of the reflexes of autotomy in decapod Crustacea. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (B), 35, 232–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, C. L., 1973. Comparative Animal Physiology, ix, 888 pp. Philadelphia: W. B. SaundersCo.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. H., Abele, L. G. & Robinson, B., 1970. Attack autotomy: a defence against predators. Science, New York, 169, 300–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, G. F., 1977. The Biology of Crabs, xv, 202 pp. London: Mlek Science.Google Scholar
Weis, J. S., 1976. Effects of environmental factors on regeneration and moulting in fiddler crabs. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 150, 152–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed