Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:39:12.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Iron Metabolism in Mytilus Edulis 1. Variation in Total Content and Distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. J. Hobden*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Southampton
*
Present address: Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa 2, Canada.

Extract

The iron content of fresh Mytilus edulis L. from Southampton is usually 20–40 μg/g wet weight after the animals have eliminated their gut contents. In spring some animals have much higher iron contents, sometimes in excess of 100 μg/g. The much higher values reported by some authors are probably erroneous.

Prolonged starvation in sea water of low iron content will not reduce the mean iron content of the animals below 20–25 μg/g. This represents a permanent store. Higher values are produced by a temporary store that is fairly rapidly lost on starvation.

The highest iron concentrations are usually in the digestive gland, which contains the major part of the temporary store, much of which can be regarded as particles being subjected to the digestive processes.

Only iron in the temporary store could be demonstrated by histochemical techniques.

INTRODUCTION

The trace element metabolism of Vertebrates, particularly Mammals has been reviewed by Bothwell & Finch (1962); and Vinogradov (1953) has made a comprehensive review of the elementary chemical composition of living organisms. With notable exceptions, such as the copper in haemocyanin, the trace elements discovered in many invertebrates have no known function. The reported values for many elements differ considerably, depending on the author and the techniques used. In general, despite a number of errors in the values quoted, Vinogradov's data establish at least the order of magnitude of many elements in a variety of animals. Some of these elements occur in greater amounts than would be expected if they were not of metabolic significance. One example, namely iron in Mytilus edulis L., was selected for investigation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandt, K. & Raben, E., 1919–22. Zur Kenntnis der chemischen Zusammensetzung des Planktons und einiger Bodenorganismen. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., N.F., Bd. 19, pp. 175210.Google Scholar
Bothwell, T. H. & Finch, C. A., 1962. Iron Metabolism. 440 pp. Boston: Little, Brown Co.Google Scholar
Bunting, H., 1949. The histochemical detection of iron in tissues. Stain Technol., Vol 24, pp 109–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casselman, W. G. B., 1959. Histochemical Technique, 205 pp. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Collins, P. & Diehl, H., 1959. Tripyridyltriazine, a reagent for the determination of iron in sea water. J. mar. Res., Vol. 18, pp. 152–6.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, T. T., 1959. Radiochemical investigations on the recovery for analysis of trace elements in organic and biological materials. Analyst, Vol. 84, pp. 135–73.Google Scholar
Hepper, B. T., 1957. Notes on Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck in Great Britain. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 3340.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. H., 1938. The determination of iron in biological materials. Ind. Engng Chem., analyt. Edn, Vol. 10, pp. 302–4.Google Scholar
Kawai, K., 1961 a. Comparative biochemical studies of cytochromes and related substances of Invertebrates. II. Cytochrome-like haemoproteins in the gut fluids of Molluscs. Biochim. Biophys. Ada, Vol. 52, pp. 241–7.Google Scholar
Kawai, K., 1961 b. Comparative biochemical studies of cytochromes and related substances of Invertebrates. III. Cytochrome 556 and electron transport system in snail hepatopancreas. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Vol. 52, pp. 248–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, G. J. & Goldberg, E. D., 1954. Iron in marine waters. J. mar. Res., Vol. 13, pp. 183–97Google Scholar
Morton, J. E., 1960. The functions of the gut in ciliary feeders. Biol. Rev., Vol. 35, pp. 92140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G., 1956. Observations on the stomach and digestive diverticula of the Lamellibranchia. II. The Nuculidae. Q. jfl microsc. Sci., Vol. 97, pp. 541–67.Google Scholar
Phear, E. A., 1955. Gut haems in the Invertebrates. Proc. zool. Soc, Lond., Vol. 125, pp. 383406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandell, E. B. 1950. Colorimetric Determinations of Traces of Metals, 673 pp. New York: Interscience.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, A. P., 1953. The Elementary Chemical Composition of Marine Organisms, 647 pp. Memoir 2. Sears Foundation for Marine Research, Yale University.Google Scholar
White, K. M., 1937. Mytilus. Mem. Lpool mar. biol. Comm., No. 31, 117 pp.Google Scholar