Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:50:07.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lithistid sponges of the upper bathyal of Madeira, Selvagens and Canary Islands, with description of a new species of Isabella

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2014

F.C. Carvalho ,
S.A. Pomponi  and
J.R. Xavier
F.C. Carvalho
Affiliation:
CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-668 Vairão, Portugal
S.A. Pomponi
Affiliation:
Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, 5600 US 1 North, Fort Pierce, FL 34946, USA
J.R. Xavier*
Affiliation:
Centre for Geobiology and Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 53A, 5006 Bergen, Norway
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J.R. Xavier, Centre for Geobiology and Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 53A/B, N-5020 Bergen, Norway email: joana.xavier@bio.uib.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Desma-bearing sponges, also known as lithistids or rock sponges, are a group typical of bathyal environments throughout tropical and warm-temperate regions. In this study the lithistids collected in the course of the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute eastern Atlantic 1991 campaign to Madeira, Selvagens and the Canary Islands were identified and assigned to eight species, representing eight genera and five families. Several constitute new records for these islands and one is a new species of Isabella, a genus thus far only known from the Norfolk Ridge in New Caledonia, that is here described and illustrated. Some considerations are made in regards to the diversity and biogeographical affinities of the Atlanto-Mediterranean lithistid sponges.

Keywords

Poriferadeep-seaMacaronesian islandsdiversitybiogeography
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 95 , Issue 7: Deep-Sea Sponges , November 2015 , pp. 1287 - 1296
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowerbank, J.S. (1869) A monograph of the siliceo-fibrous sponges. Part I. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1869, 66–100, pls III–VI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cárdenas, P., Xavier, J.R., Reveillaud, J., Schander, C. and Rapp, H.T. (2012) Molecular phylogeny of the Astrophorida (Porifera, Demospongiae) reveals an unexpected high level of spicule homoplasy. PLoS ONE 6, e18318. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018318.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, P., Rapp, H.T., Klitgaard, A.B., Best, M., Thollesson, M. and Tendal, O.S. (2013) Taxonomy, biogeography and DNA barcodes of Geodia species (Porifera, Demospongiae, Tetractinellida) in the Atlantic boreo-arctic region. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 169, 251–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H.J. (1876) Descriptions and figures of deep-sea sponges and their spicules, from the Atlantic Ocean, dredged up on board H.M.S. ‘Porcupine’, chiefly in 1869 (concluded). Annals and Magazine of Natural History (4) 18(105), 226–240; (106), 307–324; (107), 388–410; (108), 458–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, T. (2002) Esponjas marinas de Canarias. S/C Tenerife: Consejería de Política Territorial y Medio Ambiente del Gobierno de Canarias, 260 pp.Google Scholar
Du Bocage, J.V.B. (1869) [1870] Eponges siliceuses nouvelles du Portugal et de l'île Saint-Iago (Archipel de Cap-Vert). Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas, Physicas e Naturaes 2, 159–162.Google Scholar
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. and Vrijenhoek, R. (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, 294–299.Google ScholarPubMed
Gray, J.E. (1859) Description of Macandrewia and Myliusia, two new forms of sponges. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 27, 437–440, pls. XV–XVI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hestetun, F.T., Fourt, M., Vacelet, I., Boury-Esnault, N. and Rapp, H.T. (2014) Cladorhizidae (Porifera, Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida) of the deep Atlantic collected during Ifremer cruises, with a biogeographic overview of the Atlantic species. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 1–32. doi:10.1017/S0025315413001100.Google Scholar
Hooper, J.N.A. and Van Soest, R.W.M. (2002). Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J.Y. (1863) Description of a new siliceous sponge from the coast of Madeira. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London 1863, 257–259.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. (2007) The marine fauna of New Zealand: Porifera: lithistid Demospongiae (rock sponges). NIWA Biodiversity Memoir 121, 1–100.Google Scholar
Kelly, M., Ellwood, M., Tubbs, L. and Buckeridge, J. (2007) The lithistid Demospongiae in New Zealand waters: species composition and distribution. In Custódio, M.R., Lôbo-Hajdu, G., Hajdu, E. and Muricy, G. (eds) Porifera research: biodiversity, innovation and sustainability. Série Livros 28. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional, pp. 393–404.Google Scholar
Kelly-Borges, M. and Pomponi, S.A. (1994) Phylogeny and classification of lithistid sponges (Porifera: Demospongiae): a preliminary assessment using ribossomal DNA sequence comparisons. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, 87–103.Google Scholar
von Lendenfeld, R. (1903) Porifera. Tetraxonia. In Schulze, F.E. (ed.) Das Tierreich, 19. Berlin: Friedländer, pp. vi–xv, 1–168.Google Scholar
von Lendenfeld, R. (1907) Die Tetraxonia. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf der Dampfer Valdivia 1898–1899 11, 1–2.Google Scholar
Lévi, C. (1991) Lithistid sponges from the Norfolk Rise: recent and Mesozoic genera. In Reitner, J. and Keupp, H. (eds) Fossil and recent sponges. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Publishers, pp. 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi, C. and Lévi, P. (1983) Éponges Tétractinellides et Lithistides bathyales de Nouvelle-Calédonie. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 5, 101–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi, C. and Lévi, P. (1988) Nouveaux Spongiaires éponges lithistids bathyaux à affinities crétacées de la Nouvelle Calédonie. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 4, 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longo, C., Mastrotaro, F. and Corriero, G. (2005) Sponge fauna associated with a Mediterranean deep-sea coral bank. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 1341–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnino, G., Gravina, M.F., Righni, P., Serena, F. and Pansini, M. (1999) Due demosponge Lithistidi nuove per i mari italiani. Biologia Marina Mediterranea 6, 391–393.Google Scholar
Manconi, R. and Serusi, A. (2008) Rare sponges from marine caves: discovery of Neophrissospongia nana nov. sp. (Demospongiae, Corallistidae) from Sardinia with an annotated checklist of Mediterranean lithistids. Zookeys 4, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manconi, R., Serusi, A. and Pisera, A. (2006) A new mediterranean ‘lithistid’ sponge, Aciculites mediterranea sp. nov. (Porifera: Demospongiae) from a dark marine cave in Sardinia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 86, 691–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInerney, J.O., Adams, C.L. and Kelly, M. (1999) Phylogenetic resolution potential of 18S and 28S rRNA genes within the lithistid Astrophorida. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 44, 343–351.Google Scholar
Perez, T., Vacelet, J., Bitar, G. and Zibrowius, H. (2004) Two new lithistids (Porifera, Demospongiae) from a shallow eastern Mediterranean cave (Lebanon). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 84, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisera, A. (2002) Fossil ‘Lithistids’: an overview. In Hooper, J.N.A. and van Soest, R.W.M (eds) Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 388–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisera, A. and Lévi, C. (2002) ‘Lithistid’ demospongiae. In Hooper, J.N.A. and van Soest, R.W.M. (eds) Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 299–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisera, A. and Vacelet, J. (2011) Lithistid sponges from submarine caves in the Mediterranean: taxonomy and affinities. Scientia Marina 75, 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomponi, S.A., Kelly, M., Reed, J.K. and Wright, A. (2001) Diversity and bathymetric distribution of lithistid sponges in the tropical western Atlantic region. Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington 10, 344–353.Google Scholar
Redmond, N.E., Morrow, C.C., Thacker, R.W., Diaz, M.C., Boury-Esnault, N., Cárdenas, P., Hajdu, E., Lôbo-Hajdu, G., Picton, B.E., Pomponi, S.A., Kayal, E. and Collins, A.G. (2013) Phylogeny and systematics of demospongiae in light of new small-subunit ribosomal DNA (18S) sequences. Integrative and Comparative Biology 52, 388–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlacher-Hoenlinger, M.A., Pisera, A. and Hooper, J.N.A. (2005) Deep-sea ‘lithistid’ assemblages from the Norfolk Ridge (New Caledonia), with description of seven new species and a new genus (Porifera, Demospongiae). Zoosystema 27, 649–698.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. (1870) Gundzüge einer Spongien Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelman.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. (1880) Die Spongien des Meerbusens von Mexico und des Caraibischen Meeres. Heft II. Abtheilung II. Hexactinelliden. Abtheilung III. Tetractinelliden. Monactinelliden und Anhang. Nachträge zu Abtheilung I (Lithistiden). In Reports on the dredging under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico, by the USCSS ‘Blake’. Jena: Gustav Fischer, pp. 33–90, pls. V–X.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. (1924) Die Kieselspongien der oberen Kreide von Nordwestdeutschland. III. und letzter Teil. Monographien zur Geologie und Paläontologie 2, 1–159, I–XVII.Google Scholar
van Soest, R.W.M. and Stentoft, N. (1988) Barbados deep-water sponges. Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and Other Caribbean Islands 70, 1–175.Google Scholar
van Soest, R.W.M., Boury-Esnault, N., Hooper, J.N.A., Rützler, K., de Voogd, N.J., Alvarez de Glasby, B., Hajdu, E., Pisera, A.B., Manconi, R., Schoenberg, C., Janussen, D., Tabachnick, K.R., Klautau, M., Picton, B., Kelly, M., Vacelet, J., Dohrmann, M., Díaz, M.C. and Cárdenas, P. (2014) World Porifera database. Available at http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera (accessed 29 July 2014).Google Scholar
Sollas, W.J. (1885) A classification of the sponges. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (5) 16, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollas, W.J. (1888) Report on the Tetractinellida collected by H.M.S. Challenger, during the years 1873–1876. Report on the Scientific Reports of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, 1873–1876. Zoology 25, 1–458.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1889) Quelques spongiaires du Banc de Campêche et de la Pointe-á-Pître. Mémoires de la Société Zoologique de France 2, 30–52.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1892) Contribution à l'étude des Spongiaires de l'Atlantique Nord (Golfe de Gascogne, Terre-Neuve, Açores). Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accomplies par le Prince Albert I. Monaco 2, 1–165.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1894) Etude monographique des spongiaires de France. I.Tetractinellida. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale 2, 259–400.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1898) Eponges nouvelles des Açores. (Première serie) Mémoires de la Société Zoologique de France 11, 225–255.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1904) Spongiaires des Açores. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques Accomplies par le Prince Albert I. Monaco 25, 1–280, pls. 1–18.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1928) Spongiaires de l'Atlantique et de la Méditerranée provenant des croisières du Prince Albert ler de Monaco. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques Accomplies par le Prince Albert I. Monaco 74, 1–376.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J. (1969) Eponges de la roche du large et de l'étage bathyal de Méditerranée (Récoltes de la soucoupe plongeante Costeau et dragages). Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (A, Zoologie) 59, 145–219.Google Scholar
Xavier, J.R. and Van Soest, R.W.M. (2012) Diversity patterns and zoogeography of the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean shallow-water sponge fauna. Hydrobiologia 687, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Carvalho Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Carvalho Supplementary Material(File)
File 13.3 KB