Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:31:50.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling the effects of marine aggregate extraction on benthic assemblages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2009

Jon Barry ,
Sian Boyd  and
Robert Fryer
Jon Barry*
Affiliation:
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHT, UK
Sian Boyd
Affiliation:
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHT, UK
Robert Fryer
Affiliation:
FRS Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB, Scotland
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J. Barry, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHT, UK email jon.barry@cefas.co.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper develops models of the initial impact of marine aggregate extraction on a benthic assemblage. We predict the effect of dredging on species numbers and abundance assuming spatial randomness of individuals. We extend the model to allow for spatial clustering of individuals using a Matern process. Data from a controlled field experiment are used to develop a framework for estimating species reduction. This involves modelling the spatial pattern of individuals before dredging using a Matern process, the impact of dredging at an individual level, and the probability that a species is not seen in a post-dredging survey. The framework was used to estimate that, of the 41 species that were seen in a pre-dredging survey but not in a post-dredging survey, between 0 and 14 were eliminated (with 95% likelihood) rather than escaped detection. The most likely number eliminated was 4.

Keywords

species richness and abundanceimpact surveysspatial point processesMatern cluster processmaximum likelihooddredgingmarine aggregate extractionbenthic assemblage
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 105 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barrio Froján, C.R.S., Boyd, S.E., Cooper, K.M., Eggleton, J.E. and Ware, S. (2008) Long-term benthic responses to sustained disturbance by aggregate extraction in an area off the east coast of the United Kingdom. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 89, 204–212.Google Scholar
Boyd, S.E. (compiler) (2002) Guidelines for the conduct of benthic studies at aggregate dredging sites. Lowestoft: Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, CEFAS, 117 pp.Google Scholar
Boyd, S.E. and Rees, H.L. (2003) An examination of the spatial scale of impact on the marine benthos arising from marine aggregate extraction in the Central English Channel. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.A. (1993) Guidelines for assessing marine aggregate extraction. MAFF, Lowestoft, Leaflet 73, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Chao, A. (2004) Species richness estimation. In Balakrishnan, N., Read, C.B. and Vidakovic, B. (eds) Encyclopaedia of statistical sciences. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley, pp. 7906–7916.Google Scholar
Cooper, K., Boyd, S.E., Aldridge, J. and Rees, H.L. (2007a) An assessment of the cumulative impacts of aggregate extraction on seabed macro-invertebrate communities in an area characterised by multiple extraction licences off the east coast of the United Kingdom. Journal of Sea Research 57, 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, K., Boyd, S., Eggleton, J., Limpenny, D.Rees, H. and Vanstaen, K. (2007b) Recovery of the seabed following marine aggregate dredging on the Hastings Shingle Bank off the southeast coast of England. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 75, 547–588.Google Scholar
Desprez, M. (2000) Physical and biological impact of marine aggregate extraction along the French coast of the eastern English Channel. Short and long-term post-dredging restoration. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 1428–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICES (1992) Effects of extraction of marine sediments on fisheries. Cooperative Research Report No. 182, International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Copenhagen, 78 pp.Google Scholar
ICES (2003) ICES Guidelines for the management of marine sediment extraction. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment. ICES Co-operative Research Report 263, pp. 210–215.Google Scholar
Kenny, A.J. and Rees, H.L. (1994) The effects of marine gravel extraction on the macrobenthos: early post-dredging recolonisation. Marine Pollution Bulletin 28, 442–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, A.J. and Rees, H.L. (1996) The effects of marine gravel extraction on the macrobenthos: results 2 years post dredging. Marine Pollution Bulletin 32, 615–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, A.J., Rees, H.L., Greening, J. and Campbell, S. (1998) The effects of gravel extraction on the macrobenthos at an experimental dredge site off north Norfolk, UK (results 3 years post-dredging). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, CM 1998/V: 14, 1–7.Google Scholar
Manly, B.F.J. (1998) Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. 2nd edition. London: Chapman and Hall, 399 pp.Google Scholar
Marine Minerals Guidance Note II (2007) The control of marine minerals dredging from the British seabed. Marine and Fisheries Agency, 87 pp.Google Scholar
Matern, B. (1986) Spatial variation. 2nd edition. Lecture Notes in Statistics, no 36. New York: Springer, 151 pp.Google Scholar
Neyman, J. and Scott, E.L. (1958) Statistical approaches to problems of cosmology (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 20, 1–43.Google Scholar
Newell, R.C., Seiderer, L.J. and Hitchcock, D.R. (1998) The impact of dredging works in coastal waters: a review of the sensitivity to disturbance and subsequent recovery of biological resources on the sea bed. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 36, 127–178.Google Scholar
Newell, R.C., Seiderer, L.J., Simpson, N.M. and Robinson, J.E. (2004) Impacts of marine aggregate dredging on benthic macrofauna off the south coast of the United Kingdom. Journal of Coastal Research 20, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2002) Marine Minerals Guidance Note 1. Guidance on the extraction by dredging of sand, gravel and other minerals from the English seabed. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 30 pp.Google Scholar
Office of Public Sector Information (2007) The Environmental Impact Assessment and Natural Habitats (Extraction of Minerals by Marine Dredging) (England and Northern Ireland) Regulations 2007. No.1067. Statutory Instruments, 36 pp.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Viena: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J.E., Newell, R.C., Seidener, L.J. and Simpson, N.M. (2005) Impacts of aggregate dredging on sediment composition and associated benthic fauna at an offshore dredge site in the southern North Sea. Marine Environmental Research 60, 51–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Sardá, R., Pinedo, S., Grémare, A. and Taboada, S. (2000) Changes in the dynamics of shallow sandy-bottom assemblages due to sand extraction in the Catalan Western Mediterranean Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 1446–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1990) Experiments in ecology and management: their logics, functions and interpretation. Australian Journal of Ecology 15, 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1993) The mechanics of spatially replicated sampling programmes to detect environmental impacts in a variable world. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Chapman, M.G. (2003) Power, precaution, Type II error and sampling design in assessment of environmental impacts. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Pollution 296, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Chapman, M.G. (2005) Design and analysis in benthic surveys. In Elefheriou, A. and McIntyre, A.D. (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos. 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
van Dalfsen, J.A., Essink, K., Toxvig Madsen, H., Birklund, J., Romero, J. and Manzanera, M. (2000) Differential response of macrozoobenthos to marine sand extraction in the North Sea and the Western Mediterranean. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 1439–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dalfsen, J.A. and Essink, K. (2001) Benthic community response to sand dredging and shoreface nourishment in Dutch coastal waters. Senekenbergiana Maritime 31, 329–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Rijn, L.C., Soulsby, R.L., Hoekstra, P. and Davies, A.G. (eds) (2005) SANDPIT: Sand Transport and Morphology of Offshore Sand Mining Pits. Process knowledge and guidelines for coastal management. EC Framework V Project No. EVK3-2001-00056. The Netherlands: Aqua Publications.Google Scholar