Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:13:05.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological variation of pallial organs at sites of differing turbidity: a case study of an arcid bivalve

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2012

Kenji Yoshino ,
Toshiya Katano ,
Yuichi Hayami ,
Takaharu Hamada  and
Genta Kobayashi
Kenji Yoshino*
Affiliation:
Institute of Lowland and Marine Research, Saga University, Honjo-machi 1, Saga City, Saga 840-8502, Japan
Toshiya Katano
Affiliation:
Institute of Lowland and Marine Research, Saga University, Honjo-machi 1, Saga City, Saga 840-8502, Japan
Yuichi Hayami
Affiliation:
Institute of Lowland and Marine Research, Saga University, Honjo-machi 1, Saga City, Saga 840-8502, Japan
Takaharu Hamada
Affiliation:
Institute of Lowland and Marine Research, Saga University, Honjo-machi 1, Saga City, Saga 840-8502, Japan
Genta Kobayashi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Saga University, Honjo-machi 1, Saga City, Saga 840-8502, Japan
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: K. Yoshino, Institute of Lowland and Marine Research, Saga University, Honjo-machi 1, Saga City, Saga 840-8502, Japan email: c1894@cc.saga-u.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated morphological differences in specimens of the arcid bivalve Scapharca kagoshimensis collected from two sites differing in turbidity in the inner part of Ariake Bay. First, we confirmed if the specimens collected from the two sites were the same species by comparing the sequences of their nuclear 18S ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) and cytchrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), since the closely related species S. inequivalvis could be distributed in one site. The results of DNA analyses showed that specimens from both sites belonged to the same species. Shell morphology, gill and posterior adductor muscle size did not differ between the two populations. However, the size of the labial palp was significantly larger in bivalves living in an area of high turbidity compared with those living in an area with low turbidity. This difference could not simply be attributed to differences in meat content because the total weight of the soft body parts did not differ between the two populations. The labial palp is an organ functioning in preingestive particle selection. Hence, the large palps would presumably be a response to high turbidity conditions in which the need for particle processes increases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating palp size flexibility in arcid bivalves, and such flexibility could be a factor enabling S. kagoshimensis to successfully exploit a wide area of shallow water in the inner part of Ariake Bay.

Keywords

arcid bivalveAriake Baylabial palpturbidity18S rDNACOI mtDNA
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , June 2013 , pp. 1009 - 1015
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, R.R. (1993) Correlation of shape and habit with sediment grain size for selected species of the bivalve Anadara. Lethaia 26, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R.R., Stanton, R.J. Jr and Dodd, J.R. (1993) Influence of sediment grain size on the burrowing of bivalves: correlation with distribution and stratigraphic persistence of selected neogene clams. Palaios 8, 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, D. (1937a) On the cilliary mechanisms and interrelationships of lamellibranchs. Part I: new observations on sorting mechanisms. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 79, 181–310.Google Scholar
Atkins, D. (1937b) On the cilliary mechanisms and interrelationships of lamellibranchs. Part III: types of lamellibranch gills and their food currents. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 79, 375–421.Google Scholar
Baker, S.M., Levinton, J.S. and Ward, J.E. (2000) Particle transport in the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 199, 116–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barillé, L., Prou, J., Heral, M. and Bougrier, S. (1993) No influence of food quality, but ration-dependent retention efficiencies in the Japanese oyster Crassostrea gigas. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 171, 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barillé, L., Haure, J., Cognie, B. and Leroy, A. (2000) Variations in pallial organs and eulatero-frontal cirri in response to high particulate matter concentrations in the oyster Crassostrea gigas. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57, 837–843.Google Scholar
Beninger, P.G., Cannuel, R. and Jaunet, S. (2005) Particle processing on the gill plicae of the oyster Crassostrea gigas: fine-scale mucocyte distribution and functional correlates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 295, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauvaud, L., Thouzeau, G. and Paulet, Y.M. (1998) Effects of environmental factors on the daily growth rate of Pecten maximus juveniles in the Bay of Brest (France). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 227, 83–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cognie, B., Barillé, L., Massé, G. and Beninger, P.G. (2003) Selection and processing of large suspended algae in the oyster Crassostrea gigas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 250, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranford, P.J. and Gordon, D.C. Jr (1992) The influence of dilute clay suspensions on sea scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) feeding activity and tissue growth. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 30, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drent, J., Luttikhuizen, P.C. and Piersma, T. (2004) Morphological dynamics in the foraging apparatus of a deposit feeding marine bivalve: phenotypic plasticity and heritable effects. Functional Ecology 18, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutertre, M., Barillé, L., Haure, J. and Cognie, B. (2007) Functional responses associated with pallial organ variations in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 352, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutertre, M., Barillé, L., Beninger, P.G., Rosa, P. and Gruet, Y. (2009) Variations in the pallial organ sizes of the invasive oyster, Crassostrea gigas, along an extreme turbidity gradient. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 85, 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J., Cummings, V., Hewitt, J., Thrush, S. and Norkko, A. (2002) Determining effects of suspended sediment on condition of a suspension feeding bivalve (Atrina zelandica): results of a survey, a laboratory experiment and a field transplant experiment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 267, 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, B. and Sherr, E.B. (1984) δ13C measurements as indicators of carbon flow in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Contributions in Marine Science 27, 13–47.Google Scholar
Honkoop, P.J.C., Bayne, B.L. and Drent, J. (2003) Flexibility of size of gills and palps in the Sydney rock oyster Saccostrea glomerata (Gould, 1850) and the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 282, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias, J.I.P., Navarro, E., Alvarez Jorna, P. and Armentia, I. (1992) Feeding, particle selection and absorption in cockles Cerastoderma edule (L.) exposed to variable conditions of food concentration and quality. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 162, 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H.D., Richards, O.G. and Southern, T.A. (1992) Gill dimensions, water pumping rate and body size in the mussel Mytilus edulis L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 155, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiørboe, T. and Møhlenberg, F. (1981) Particle selection in suspension-feeding bivalves. Marine Ecology Progress Series 5, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, C.-H., Khim, J.S., Araki, H., Yamanishi, H., Mogi, H. and Koga, K. (2006) Tidal resuspension of microphytobenthic chlorophyll a in a Nanaura mudflat, Saga, Ariake Sea, Japan: flood-ebb and spring-neap variations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 312, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, C.F. (1966) A comparative study on the ciliary feeding mechanisms of Anadara species from different habitats. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 130, 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorrain, A., Paulet, Y.M., Chauvaud, L., Savoye, N., Nezan, E. and Guerin, L. (2000) Growth anomalies in Pecten maximus from coastal waters (Bay of Brest, France): relationship with diatom blooms. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80, 667–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, M. (2003) Phylogenetic analysis of the subclass Pteriomorphia (Bivalvia) from mtDNA COI sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 27, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyerhöfer, E. (1985) Comparative pumping rates in suspension-feeding bivalves. Marine Biology 85, 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, R.C. (1985) Factors affecting the distribution of the introduced bivalve, Mercenaria mercenaria in a California lagoon—the importance of bioturbation. Journal of Marine Research 43, 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, E. and Widdows, J. (1997) Feeding physiology of Cerastoderma edule in response to a wide range of seston concentrations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 152, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nel, R., McLachlan, A. and Winter, D.P.E. (2001) The effect of grain size on the burrowing of two Donax species. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 265, 219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, P.G. and Holmes, A.M. (2006) The Arcoidea (Mollusca: Bivalvia): a review of the current phonetic-based systematics. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 148, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, R. and Williams, L. (1980) Effect of particle concentration on filtration efficiency by the bay scallop Argopecten irradians and the oyster Crassostrea virginica. Ophelia 19, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, B.S., Lei, J., Miller, A.C. and Hubertz, E.D. (1995) Adaptive variation in palp and gill size of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and Asian clam (Corbicula fluminea). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52, 1130–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoads, D.C. and Young, D.K. (1970) The influence of deposit-feeding organisms on sediment stability and trophic community structure. Journal of Marine Research 28, 150–178.Google Scholar
Riisgård, H.U. (1988) Efficiency of particle retention and filtration rate in 6 species of Northeast American bivalves. Marine Ecology Progress Series 45, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theisen, B.F. (1977) Feeding rate of Mytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia) from different parts of Danish waters in water of different turbidity. Ophelia 16, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theisen, B.F. (1978) Allozyme clines and evidence of strong selection in three loci in Mytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia) from Danish waters. Ophelia 17, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theisen, B.F. (1982) Variation in size of gills, labial palps, and adductor muscle in Mytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia) from Danish waters. Ophelia 21, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urrutia, M.B., Igresias, J.I.P. and Navarro, E. (1997) Feeding behaviour of Cerastoderma edule in a turbid environment: physiological adaptations and derived benefit. Hydrobiologia 355, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J.E. (1996) Biodynamics of suspension-feeding in adult bivalve mollusks: particle capture, processing, and fate. Invertebrate Biology 115, 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J.E., Newell, R.I.E., Thompson, R.J. and MacDonald, B.A. (1994) In vivo studies of suspension-feeding processes in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 186, 221–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, J.E., Levinton, J.S., Shumway, S.E. and Cucci, T. (1998) Particle sorting in bivalves: in vivo determination of the pallial organs of selection. Marine Biology 131, 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J.E. and Shumway, S.E. (2004) Separating the grain from the chalf: particle selection in suspension- and deposit-feeding bivalves. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 300, 83–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J.H. (1983) Retention efficiency and pumping rate of Ostrea edulis in suspensions of Isochrysis galbana. Marine Ecology Progress Series 12, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshino, K., Yamamoto, K., Hayami, Y., Hamada, T., Kasagi, T., Ueno, D. and Ohgushi, K. (2007) Benthic fauna of the inner part of Ariake Bay: long term changes in several ecological parameters. Plankton and Benthos Research 2, 198–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshino, K., Yamamoto, K., Hayami, Y., Hamada, T., Yamaguchi, S. and Ohgushi, K. (2009) Tidal flat macrofauna in the inner part of Ariake Bay. Japanese Journal of Benthology 64, 15–24. [In Japanese with English abstract.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yurimoto, T., Mori, Y., Ito, S. and Maeno, Y. (2008) Reproductive cycle of the subcrenated ark shell Scapharca kagoshimensis (Tokunaga, 1906) in Ariake Bay, Japan. Journal of Shellfish Research 27, 1101–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar